A Hybrid Expert System for Estimation of the Manufacturability of a Notional Design

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1155/2024/4985090
Alexander Sommers, Shahram Rahimi, Tonya G. McCall, Emily Wall, Althea Henslee, Larry Dalton, Paul D. Babin, Nathan Watson, Gehendra Sharma, Milan D. Parmar
{"title":"A Hybrid Expert System for Estimation of the Manufacturability of a Notional Design","authors":"Alexander Sommers, Shahram Rahimi, Tonya G. McCall, Emily Wall, Althea Henslee, Larry Dalton, Paul D. Babin, Nathan Watson, Gehendra Sharma, Milan D. Parmar","doi":"10.1155/2024/4985090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The more “manufacturable” a product is, the “easier” it is to manufacture. For two different product designs targeting the same role, one may be more manufacturable than the other. Evaluating manufacturability requires experts in the processes of manufacturing, “manufacturing process engineers” (MPEs). Human experts are expensive to train and employ, while a well-designed expert system (ES) could be quicker, more reliable, and provide higher performance and superior accuracy. In this work, a group of MPEs (“Team A”) externalized a portion of their expertise into a rule-based expert system in cooperation with a group of ES knowledge engineers and developers. We produced a large ES with 113 total rules and 94 variables. The ES comprises a crisp ES which constructs a Fuzzy ES, thus producing a two-stage ES. Team A then used the ES and a derivation of it (the “MAKE A”) to conduct assessments of the manufacturability of several “notional” designs, providing a sanity check of the rule-base. A provisional assessment used a first draft of the rule-base, and MAKE A, and was of notional wing designs. The primary assessment, using an updated rule-base and MAKE A, was of notional rotor blade designs. We describe the process by which this ES was made and the assessments that were conducted and conclude with insights gained from constructing the ES. These insights can be summarized as follows: build a bridge between expert and user, move from general features to specific features, do not make the user do a lot of work, and only ask the user for objective observations. We add the product of our work to the growing library of tools and methodologies at the disposal of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). The primary findings of the present work are (1) an ES that satisfied the experts, according to their expressed performance expectations, and (2) the insights gained on how such a system might best be constructed.","PeriodicalId":44894,"journal":{"name":"Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4985090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The more “manufacturable” a product is, the “easier” it is to manufacture. For two different product designs targeting the same role, one may be more manufacturable than the other. Evaluating manufacturability requires experts in the processes of manufacturing, “manufacturing process engineers” (MPEs). Human experts are expensive to train and employ, while a well-designed expert system (ES) could be quicker, more reliable, and provide higher performance and superior accuracy. In this work, a group of MPEs (“Team A”) externalized a portion of their expertise into a rule-based expert system in cooperation with a group of ES knowledge engineers and developers. We produced a large ES with 113 total rules and 94 variables. The ES comprises a crisp ES which constructs a Fuzzy ES, thus producing a two-stage ES. Team A then used the ES and a derivation of it (the “MAKE A”) to conduct assessments of the manufacturability of several “notional” designs, providing a sanity check of the rule-base. A provisional assessment used a first draft of the rule-base, and MAKE A, and was of notional wing designs. The primary assessment, using an updated rule-base and MAKE A, was of notional rotor blade designs. We describe the process by which this ES was made and the assessments that were conducted and conclude with insights gained from constructing the ES. These insights can be summarized as follows: build a bridge between expert and user, move from general features to specific features, do not make the user do a lot of work, and only ask the user for objective observations. We add the product of our work to the growing library of tools and methodologies at the disposal of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). The primary findings of the present work are (1) an ES that satisfied the experts, according to their expressed performance expectations, and (2) the insights gained on how such a system might best be constructed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算名义设计可制造性的混合专家系统
产品的 "可制造性 "越强,制造起来就越 "容易"。对于针对同一角色的两种不同产品设计,其中一种可能比另一种更具可制造性。评估可制造性需要制造工艺方面的专家,即 "制造工艺工程师"(MPE)。人类专家的培训和聘用成本高昂,而精心设计的专家系统(ES)可以更快、更可靠,并提供更高的性能和卓越的准确性。在这项工作中,一组 MPE("团队 A")与一组 ES 知识工程师和开发人员合作,将他们的部分专业知识外化为基于规则的专家系统。我们制作了一个大型 ES,共有 113 条规则和 94 个变量。该 ES 包括一个简明 ES,它构建了一个模糊 ES,从而产生了一个两阶段 ES。然后,团队 A 使用该 ES 及其衍生物("MAKE A")对几种 "名义 "设计的可制造性进行评估,对规则库进行合理性检查。临时评估使用了规则库和 MAKE A 的初稿,针对的是假想机翼设计。主要评估使用了更新后的规则库和 MAKE A,对名义转子叶片设计进行了评估。我们介绍了该 ES 的制作过程和所进行的评估,并总结了从构建 ES 中获得的启示。这些见解可归纳如下:在专家和用户之间架起一座桥梁,从一般特征转向具体特征,不要让用户做大量的工作,只要求用户提供客观的观察结果。美国陆军工程研究与发展中心(ERDC)的工具和方法库正在不断扩大,我们将把我们的工作成果加入其中。这项工作的主要成果是:(1)根据专家们表达的性能预期,开发出了令他们满意的 ES;(2)在如何以最佳方式构建此类系统方面获得了深刻见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing will focus on the disciplines of computer science, engineering, and mathematics. The scope of the journal includes developing applications related to all aspects of natural and social sciences by employing the technologies of computational intelligence and soft computing. The new applications of using computational intelligence and soft computing are still in development. Although computational intelligence and soft computing are established fields, the new applications of using computational intelligence and soft computing can be regarded as an emerging field, which is the focus of this journal.
期刊最新文献
Morphological Accuracy Data Clustering: A Novel Algorithm for Enhanced Cluster Analysis Indonesian Lip-Reading Detection and Recognition Based on Lip Shape Using Face Mesh and Long-Term Recurrent Convolutional Network A Novel Deep Learning-Based Data Analysis Model for Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation and Electrical Consumption Forecasting in the Smart Power Grid Emotion Modeling in Speech Signals: Discrete Wavelet Transform and Machine Learning Tools for Emotion Recognition System A Hybrid Expert System for Estimation of the Manufacturability of a Notional Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1