Sustainable energy consumption behaviour with smart meters: The role of relative performance and evaluative standards

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1111/isj.12520
Charlotte Wendt, Dominick Kosin, Martin Adam, Alexander Benlian
{"title":"Sustainable energy consumption behaviour with smart meters: The role of relative performance and evaluative standards","authors":"Charlotte Wendt,&nbsp;Dominick Kosin,&nbsp;Martin Adam,&nbsp;Alexander Benlian","doi":"10.1111/isj.12520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing adoption of smart meters enables the measurement of households' energy consumption, influenced not solely by building characteristics such as thermal insulation but also by residents' behavioural patterns, such as heating and ventilation practices. To motivate residents to adopt more sustainable behaviours, user interfaces on smartphones and laptops are increasingly using consumption data from households' smart meters to enable effective goal-setting. In contrast to previous research largely focusing on goal-setting in isolation, this study examines the role of specific social comparison-related design features that future research and practitioners can consider along with goal-setting to stimulate sustainable behaviours. Specifically, we look into the influence of residents' perception of their <i>relative performance</i> (i.e., whether their behaviour was better or worse than a reference group) on their ambition to act (i.e., targeted improvement goal) and their actual energy consumption behaviour. Moreover, we investigate the influence of a goal's <i>evaluative standard</i> (i.e., whether the goal refers to one's own or other's performance) on the relationship between relative performance, ambition to act, and energy consumption behaviour. Drawing on social comparison theory, we conducted a framed field experiment with 152 households. We find that a goal's evaluative standard influences residents' awareness of their relative performance, affecting their ambition to act and, ultimately, their energy consumption behaviour. More specifically, we find that whereas other- (vs. self-) referencing goals encourage residents from worse-than-average performing households more strongly to improve their energy consumption behaviour, they discourage better-than-average ones. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the interplay between relative performance and evaluative standards as a means of fostering social comparison in smart meter-facilitated goal-setting, highlighting their crucial role in effectively supporting sustainable behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"34 6","pages":"1995-2023"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12520","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.12520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing adoption of smart meters enables the measurement of households' energy consumption, influenced not solely by building characteristics such as thermal insulation but also by residents' behavioural patterns, such as heating and ventilation practices. To motivate residents to adopt more sustainable behaviours, user interfaces on smartphones and laptops are increasingly using consumption data from households' smart meters to enable effective goal-setting. In contrast to previous research largely focusing on goal-setting in isolation, this study examines the role of specific social comparison-related design features that future research and practitioners can consider along with goal-setting to stimulate sustainable behaviours. Specifically, we look into the influence of residents' perception of their relative performance (i.e., whether their behaviour was better or worse than a reference group) on their ambition to act (i.e., targeted improvement goal) and their actual energy consumption behaviour. Moreover, we investigate the influence of a goal's evaluative standard (i.e., whether the goal refers to one's own or other's performance) on the relationship between relative performance, ambition to act, and energy consumption behaviour. Drawing on social comparison theory, we conducted a framed field experiment with 152 households. We find that a goal's evaluative standard influences residents' awareness of their relative performance, affecting their ambition to act and, ultimately, their energy consumption behaviour. More specifically, we find that whereas other- (vs. self-) referencing goals encourage residents from worse-than-average performing households more strongly to improve their energy consumption behaviour, they discourage better-than-average ones. Overall, our study provides novel insights into the interplay between relative performance and evaluative standards as a means of fostering social comparison in smart meter-facilitated goal-setting, highlighting their crucial role in effectively supporting sustainable behaviours.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能电表的可持续能源消费行为:相对性能和评价标准的作用
随着智能电表的日益普及,对家庭能源消耗的测量已不再仅仅受保温隔热等建筑特性的影响,而且还受到供暖通风等居民行为模式的影响。为了激励居民采取更可持续的行为,智能手机和笔记本电脑上的用户界面越来越多地使用来自家庭智能电表的能耗数据,以实现有效的目标设定。以前的研究主要集中在孤立的目标设定上,与此不同,本研究探讨了与社会比较相关的特定设计特征的作用,未来的研究和从业人员可以将这些特征与目标设定一起考虑,以激发可持续行为。具体来说,我们研究了居民对自己相对表现的看法(即他们的行为是优于还是劣于参照组)对其行动雄心(即有针对性的改善目标)和实际能源消耗行为的影响。此外,我们还研究了目标的评价标准(即目标是指自己的表现还是他人的表现)对相对表现、行动雄心和能耗行为之间关系的影响。借鉴社会比较理论,我们对 152 个家庭进行了有框架的实地实验。我们发现,目标的评价标准会影响居民对自身相对表现的认识,从而影响他们的行动雄心,最终影响他们的能源消耗行为。更具体地说,我们发现,与自我参照目标相比,他者参照目标更能鼓励表现差于平均水平的家庭改善其能源消耗行为,而对于表现好于平均水平的家庭,他者参照目标则会阻碍其改善能源消耗行为。总之,我们的研究对相对绩效和评价标准之间的相互作用提供了新颖的见解,而相对绩效和评价标准是智能电表促进的目标设定过程中促进社会比较的一种手段,强调了它们在有效支持可持续行为中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Digital transformation in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities Examining formation and alleviation of information security fatigue by using job demands–resources theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1