Spanish Negative Concord Items: Experimental Evidence for Their Status as Strict Negative Polarity Items

Daniel Vergara
{"title":"Spanish Negative Concord Items: Experimental Evidence for Their Status as Strict Negative Polarity Items","authors":"Daniel Vergara","doi":"10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the semantic status of Spanish Negative Concord Items (NCIs) through their comparison with English Negative Quantifiers (NQs) and Polarity Items (PIs) in acceptability judgment tasks conducted among native speakers of Spanish and English. NCIs exhibit a dual behavior depending on their syntactic context, which has resulted in various analyses that categorize them as NQs, PIs, or non-negative indefinites. The findings from this investigation provide experimental confirmation that Spanish NCIs behave like strict Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) or indefinites that are exclusively licensed by a syntactically local anti-veridical operator (i.e., negation). This experimental approach sheds light on the longstanding controversy surrounding the semantic characterization of Spanish NCIs and contributes to our understanding of their behavior across a wide array of linguistic contexts.","PeriodicalId":506434,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","volume":"124 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the semantic status of Spanish Negative Concord Items (NCIs) through their comparison with English Negative Quantifiers (NQs) and Polarity Items (PIs) in acceptability judgment tasks conducted among native speakers of Spanish and English. NCIs exhibit a dual behavior depending on their syntactic context, which has resulted in various analyses that categorize them as NQs, PIs, or non-negative indefinites. The findings from this investigation provide experimental confirmation that Spanish NCIs behave like strict Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) or indefinites that are exclusively licensed by a syntactically local anti-veridical operator (i.e., negation). This experimental approach sheds light on the longstanding controversy surrounding the semantic characterization of Spanish NCIs and contributes to our understanding of their behavior across a wide array of linguistic contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙语负协和项:它们作为严格负极性项目的实验证据
本研究通过在以西班牙语和英语为母语的人进行的可接受性判断任务中,将西班牙语中的否定一致词(NCIs)与英语中的否定量词(NQs)和极性词(PIs)进行比较,来研究西班牙语中的否定一致词(NCIs)的语义地位。根据句法语境的不同,NCIs 表现出双重性,因此有各种分析将其归类为 NQs、PIs 或非否定不定词。本研究的结果通过实验证实,西班牙语 NCIs 的行为类似于严格的否定极性项(NPIs)或不定语,完全由句法局部反谓语运算符(即否定)许可。这种实验方法揭示了围绕西班牙语 NCI 语义特征的长期争议,有助于我们理解它们在各种语言环境中的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Quality of Arabic Subtitles: A Multi-dimensional Assessment Approach Benefits, Challenges, and Attitudes Toward ChatGPT in English Writing Courses at Saudi Universities An Action Research on the Impact of Podcasts in Grammar Learning of Elementary Students Learner Autonomy, Language Learning Strategies and English Language Proficiency of Filipino Senior High School Students The Ambiguity Commune of The Novel “The Magic Mountain”: Social Class Tensions and Inquiry of Self
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1