The Influence of Space Standards on Housing Typologies: The Evolution of the Nuclear Family Dwelling in England

IF 1.7 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.17645/up.7758
Lucia Alonso Aranda
{"title":"The Influence of Space Standards on Housing Typologies: The Evolution of the Nuclear Family Dwelling in England","authors":"Lucia Alonso Aranda","doi":"10.17645/up.7758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the evolution of dwelling typologies in London, examining how regulations and standards have transformed housing layouts and indirectly informed personal and social interactions at home. Housing policy of the past century, as reflected through space standards, type plans, housing manuals, and reports, reveal a socio-political agenda of promoting nuclear family dwellings, traditionally a household of parents and their children. This article contributes to this discussion by exploring the contextual drivers, spatial reasoning, and evidence underpinning the decisions of housing reports such as the Tudor Walters Report (1918), the Dudley Report (1944), and the Parker Morris Report (1961). Changes in household structures can be seen through regulations: from multiple families sharing a house, to the separation of individual families into single homes, to prioritising the individual over the family unit. This article analyses how five historical moments in which typological shifts promoted nuclear family dwellings that have determined spatial hierarchies and family dynamics around cooking, eating, and socialising. Similarly, societal shifts in housing expectations, such as the changing perceptions of social status symbols, privacy, gender roles, and household dynamics have contributed to the spatial arrangement and layout of homes. By shedding light on the socio-technical transformations, this research highlights the need for innovative design solutions and evidence-based space standards to meet contemporary needs.","PeriodicalId":51735,"journal":{"name":"Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of dwelling typologies in London, examining how regulations and standards have transformed housing layouts and indirectly informed personal and social interactions at home. Housing policy of the past century, as reflected through space standards, type plans, housing manuals, and reports, reveal a socio-political agenda of promoting nuclear family dwellings, traditionally a household of parents and their children. This article contributes to this discussion by exploring the contextual drivers, spatial reasoning, and evidence underpinning the decisions of housing reports such as the Tudor Walters Report (1918), the Dudley Report (1944), and the Parker Morris Report (1961). Changes in household structures can be seen through regulations: from multiple families sharing a house, to the separation of individual families into single homes, to prioritising the individual over the family unit. This article analyses how five historical moments in which typological shifts promoted nuclear family dwellings that have determined spatial hierarchies and family dynamics around cooking, eating, and socialising. Similarly, societal shifts in housing expectations, such as the changing perceptions of social status symbols, privacy, gender roles, and household dynamics have contributed to the spatial arrangement and layout of homes. By shedding light on the socio-technical transformations, this research highlights the need for innovative design solutions and evidence-based space standards to meet contemporary needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间标准对住房类型的影响:英格兰核心家庭住宅的演变
本文探讨了伦敦住宅类型的演变,研究了法规和标准如何改变了住房布局,并间接影响了个人和社会在家中的互动。通过空间标准、类型规划、住房手册和报告反映出的上个世纪的住房政策,揭示了促进核心家庭住宅(传统上由父母和子女组成的家庭)的社会政治议程。本文通过探讨《都铎-沃尔特斯报告》(1918 年)、《达德利报告》(1944 年)和《帕克-莫里斯报告》(1961 年)等住房报告决策所依据的背景驱动因素、空间推理和证据,为这一讨论做出贡献。从法规中可以看到家庭结构的变化:从多个家庭共用一栋房屋,到单个家庭分居,再到个人优先于家庭单位。本文分析了五个历史时刻,在这些时刻,类型的转变如何促进了核心家庭住宅的发展,而核心家庭住宅决定了围绕烹饪、饮食和社交的空间等级制度和家庭动态。同样,社会对住房期望的变化,如对社会地位象征、隐私、性别角色和家庭动态的看法的变化,也促进了住宅的空间安排和布局。通过揭示社会技术变革,这项研究强调了创新设计方案和以证据为基础的空间标准的必要性,以满足当代需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Planning
Urban Planning URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Urban Planning is a new international peer-reviewed open access journal of urban studies aimed at advancing understandings and ideas of humankind’s habitats – villages, towns, cities, megacities – in order to promote progress and quality of life. The journal brings urban science and urban planning together with other cross-disciplinary fields such as sociology, ecology, psychology, technology, politics, philosophy, geography, environmental science, economics, maths and computer science, to understand processes influencing urban forms and structures, their relations with environment and life quality, with the final aim to identify patterns towards progress and quality of life.
期刊最新文献
Participatory Climate Action: Reflections on Community Diversity and the Role of External Experts Urban Shrinkage, Degrowth, and Sustainability: An Updated Research Agenda Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning Captured by Political Power: More-Than-Neoliberal Urban Development and Planning in Post-Socialist Hungary The Shrinking City as a Testing Ground for Urban Degrowth Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1