Digital Assessment Tools: As a Media for Assesing High School Science Learning

J. Penelitian, Pendidikan Ipa, Riza Andriani, Mellyzar, Isna Rezkia Lukman, Ali Imron Pasaribu, M. Fadli
{"title":"Digital Assessment Tools: As a Media for Assesing High School Science Learning","authors":"J. Penelitian, Pendidikan Ipa, Riza Andriani, Mellyzar, Isna Rezkia Lukman, Ali Imron Pasaribu, M. Fadli","doi":"10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is to produce a suitable digital assessment tool for high school students' in chemical literacy with validity, reliability, levels of difficulty and discrimination power. The research metodology is Research and Development (R&D) using the Oriondo and Dallo-Antonio model. The research stages include planning the test instrument, testing, determining empirical validity, determining reliability, and interpreting test scores. In the planning (instrument creation), where the validation score estimates by experts in content, language, construction, and media are above 0.8, indicating that the test instrument is considered suitable for further testing to estimate validity, reliability, difficulty levels, and discrimination power. Out of the 25 developed questions, 24 fit the Rasch model. The reliability of Instrument Part I is 0.67, and Part II is 0.65, falling into the \"sufficient\" category. The questions exhibit varied difficulty levels, ranging from very easy to very difficult, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.21 for Part I and 0.14 for Part II. The separation achieved by Instrument Part I is into 4 ability groups, while Instrument Part II separates into 2 ability groups. The distractors for multiple-choice questions fall into the \"good\" and \"very good\" categories, fulfilling their intended function effectively.","PeriodicalId":31522,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA","volume":" 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is to produce a suitable digital assessment tool for high school students' in chemical literacy with validity, reliability, levels of difficulty and discrimination power. The research metodology is Research and Development (R&D) using the Oriondo and Dallo-Antonio model. The research stages include planning the test instrument, testing, determining empirical validity, determining reliability, and interpreting test scores. In the planning (instrument creation), where the validation score estimates by experts in content, language, construction, and media are above 0.8, indicating that the test instrument is considered suitable for further testing to estimate validity, reliability, difficulty levels, and discrimination power. Out of the 25 developed questions, 24 fit the Rasch model. The reliability of Instrument Part I is 0.67, and Part II is 0.65, falling into the "sufficient" category. The questions exhibit varied difficulty levels, ranging from very easy to very difficult, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.21 for Part I and 0.14 for Part II. The separation achieved by Instrument Part I is into 4 ability groups, while Instrument Part II separates into 2 ability groups. The distractors for multiple-choice questions fall into the "good" and "very good" categories, fulfilling their intended function effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字评估工具:作为评估高中科学学习的媒介
本研究旨在为高中学生的化学素养制作一个合适的数字评估工具,该工具应具有有效性、 可靠性、难度和辨别力。研究方法是采用 Oriondo 和 Dallo-Antonio 模型进行研究与开发(R&D)。研究阶段包括计划测试工具、测试、确定实证有效性、确定可靠性和解释测试分数。在规划阶段(工具制作),由内容、语言、结构和媒体方面的专家进行的验证分数估计值在 0.8 以上,表明该测试工具适合进一步测试,以估计效度、信度、难度和区分度。在开发的 25 个问题中,有 24 个问题符合 Rasch 模型。工具第一部分的信度为 0.67,第二部分的信度为 0.65,属于 "充分 "类别。这些问题的难度各不相同,从非常容易到非常困难不等,第一部分的标准差(SD)为 0.21,第二部分为 0.14。工具 I 部分分为 4 个能力组,工具 II 部分分为 2 个能力组。选择题的干扰项属于 "好 "和 "非常好 "两类,有效地实现了其预期功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of a Combination of Lime (Citrus aurantifolia.), Lerak (Sapindus rarak) and Jasmine Flower (Jasminum nudiflorum) Extracts as and Environmentally Friendly Corrosion Inhibitor Performance of Cocoa Graft Seedlings as a Result of Different Number of Lower Stem Leaves and Entry Defoliation Time Students' Pedagogic Literacy Skills Based on Textbook Development Teaching Strategies in Biology Time Stamp Camera Application as A Presence to Improve the Quality of Education Effectiveness of Administering Red Belt Leaf Extract (Piper Crocatum) Against Aeromonas Hydrophila Bacteria in Vitro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1