Assessing the air salinity on agro-physiological response of Brassica oleracea var. capitata and Brassica oleracea var. botrytis

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Journal of Applied and Natural Science Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.31018/jans.v16i1.5196
Saparso, Khavid Faozi, F. Putra, Article Info
{"title":"Assessing the air salinity on agro-physiological response of Brassica oleracea var. capitata and Brassica oleracea var. botrytis","authors":"Saparso, Khavid Faozi, F. Putra, Article Info","doi":"10.31018/jans.v16i1.5196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Air salinity is one of the problems for horticulture production in coastal areas. Cabbage and Cauliflower are horticulture commodities that have the potential to develop in coastal areas. The present study aimed to examine the agro-physiological response of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis) to different concentrations of air salinity. This research was a factorial experiment on polybags arranged according to a completely randomized block design with two factors. The first factor was the crop type, namely cabbage (Grand 22) and cauliflower (Larissa F1). The second factor was the concentration of air salinity, namely 0 dS. m-1, 6 dS. m-1, 12 dS. m-1, and 18 dS. m-1. The agro-physiological changes studied were crop yield, leaf chlorophyll content, stomata density, and proline content. A stress tolerance index was measured to determine the level of crop resistance to air salinity stress. The results explained that air salinity was not able to affect crop growth and yield, but it enabled to affect crops physiologically. The highest decrease in leaf chlorophyll content was at 18 dS. m-1 of 29.16% in the vegetative stage and 37.88% in the generative stage. There was an increase in proline accumulation of leaf (1,320.63%) when the air salinity was increased (18 dS. m-1). However, the accumulation of cabbage proline was lower than that of cauliflower. Based on the stress tolerance index, cabbage is included in the category of tolerant, while cauliflower is in the category of moderate tolerance to air salinity.\n ","PeriodicalId":14996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Natural Science","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v16i1.5196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air salinity is one of the problems for horticulture production in coastal areas. Cabbage and Cauliflower are horticulture commodities that have the potential to develop in coastal areas. The present study aimed to examine the agro-physiological response of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis) to different concentrations of air salinity. This research was a factorial experiment on polybags arranged according to a completely randomized block design with two factors. The first factor was the crop type, namely cabbage (Grand 22) and cauliflower (Larissa F1). The second factor was the concentration of air salinity, namely 0 dS. m-1, 6 dS. m-1, 12 dS. m-1, and 18 dS. m-1. The agro-physiological changes studied were crop yield, leaf chlorophyll content, stomata density, and proline content. A stress tolerance index was measured to determine the level of crop resistance to air salinity stress. The results explained that air salinity was not able to affect crop growth and yield, but it enabled to affect crops physiologically. The highest decrease in leaf chlorophyll content was at 18 dS. m-1 of 29.16% in the vegetative stage and 37.88% in the generative stage. There was an increase in proline accumulation of leaf (1,320.63%) when the air salinity was increased (18 dS. m-1). However, the accumulation of cabbage proline was lower than that of cauliflower. Based on the stress tolerance index, cabbage is included in the category of tolerant, while cauliflower is in the category of moderate tolerance to air salinity.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估空气盐度对甘蓝菜变种 Capitata 和甘蓝菜变种 botrytis 的农业生理反应的影响
空气盐度是沿海地区园艺生产面临的问题之一。卷心菜和花椰菜是有潜力在沿海地区发展的园艺产品。本研究旨在考察卷心菜(Brassica oleracea var.capitata)和花椰菜(B. oleracea var.botrytis)对不同浓度空气盐度的农业生理学反应。这项研究是一项多因素试验,采用完全随机区组设计,包含两个因素。第一个因素是作物类型,即卷心菜(Grand 22)和花椰菜(Larissa F1)。第二个因素是空气盐度浓度,即 0 dS. m-1、6 dS. m-1、12 dS. m-1 和 18 dS. m-1。研究的农业生理学变化包括作物产量、叶片叶绿素含量、气孔密度和脯氨酸含量。还测量了抗逆性指数,以确定作物对空气盐度胁迫的抗性水平。结果表明,空气盐度无法影响作物的生长和产量,但能对作物的生理产生影响。叶片叶绿素含量在 18 dS. m-1 时下降幅度最大,营养期为 29.16%,生长期为 37.88%。当空气盐度增加(18 dS. m-1)时,叶片中脯氨酸的积累增加了(1,320.63%)。然而,大白菜脯氨酸的积累量低于花椰菜。根据胁迫耐受性指数,大白菜属于耐受类,而花椰菜属于中度耐受空气盐度类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied and Natural Science
Journal of Applied and Natural Science Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
期刊最新文献
Contribution to the optimization of citrus (Citrus clementina Hort. Ex Tanaka) fruit fertilization using mobile lysimetry in orchards of the Souss-Massa region, Morocco Identification and characterizations of a few species of Fusarium infecting cucumber in greenhouse conditions Induction of micronuclei in blood and histopathological alterations in gill, kidney and liver of Channa punctatus (Bloch, 1793) exposed to copper sulphate Application of data ratio analysis of lead accumulation in cartilage and bones of goats and chickens in Yogyakarta, Indonesia Development of a parametric-based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for wheat land suitability evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1