Comparative efficacy of cyclosporine 0.1%, rebamipide 2%, and carboxymethylcellulose-cyclosporine 0.05% combination eye drops in the management of dry eye disease among the Indian population

Abhinav Goyal, Khushboo Bansal
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of cyclosporine 0.1%, rebamipide 2%, and carboxymethylcellulose-cyclosporine 0.05% combination eye drops in the management of dry eye disease among the Indian population","authors":"Abhinav Goyal, Khushboo Bansal","doi":"10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comparative research study aims to evaluate and compare the results of three different eye drop formulations of Cyclosporine 0.1%, Rebamipide 2%, and a combination of Carboxymethylcellulose & Cyclosporine 0.05%, in treating dry eye cases among the Indian population. This investigation employed a randomized controlled trial design to assess the efficacy of three distinct eye drop formulations. A total of 120 patients diagnosed with dry eye disease participated in this study. Participants were assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group C (cyclosporine 0.1%), Group R (rebamipide 2%), or Group CC (combination of carboxymethylcellulose and cyclosporine 0.05%). Patients take prescribed medication for six weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline for tear production time (TFBUT) at two weeks, four weeks, and six weeks, tear production score using the Schirmer test, and dry eye symptoms were assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). The collected data were analyzed using appropriate tests to compare the effectiveness of three eye drop formulations in treating dry eye in the Indian population. : Disease improvement compared to baseline was seen in all groups based on scoring of Schirmer's score, OSDI score, and TBUT. : All three treatment groups demonstrated improvements in tear film stability, tear production, and a reduction in dry eye symptoms over the six-week treatment period. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations is needed to establish the long-term efficacy and compare the effectiveness of these treatments.","PeriodicalId":13485,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comparative research study aims to evaluate and compare the results of three different eye drop formulations of Cyclosporine 0.1%, Rebamipide 2%, and a combination of Carboxymethylcellulose & Cyclosporine 0.05%, in treating dry eye cases among the Indian population. This investigation employed a randomized controlled trial design to assess the efficacy of three distinct eye drop formulations. A total of 120 patients diagnosed with dry eye disease participated in this study. Participants were assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group C (cyclosporine 0.1%), Group R (rebamipide 2%), or Group CC (combination of carboxymethylcellulose and cyclosporine 0.05%). Patients take prescribed medication for six weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline for tear production time (TFBUT) at two weeks, four weeks, and six weeks, tear production score using the Schirmer test, and dry eye symptoms were assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). The collected data were analyzed using appropriate tests to compare the effectiveness of three eye drop formulations in treating dry eye in the Indian population. : Disease improvement compared to baseline was seen in all groups based on scoring of Schirmer's score, OSDI score, and TBUT. : All three treatment groups demonstrated improvements in tear film stability, tear production, and a reduction in dry eye symptoms over the six-week treatment period. However, further research with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations is needed to establish the long-term efficacy and compare the effectiveness of these treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环孢素 0.1%、雷贝米特 2% 和羧甲基纤维素-环孢素 0.05% 复方滴眼液在治疗印度人干眼症方面的疗效比较
这项比较研究旨在评估和比较环孢素 0.1%、雷巴米特 2% 以及羧甲基纤维素和环孢素 0.05% 复方三种不同滴眼液配方在治疗印度人干眼症方面的效果。这项调查采用了随机对照试验设计,以评估三种不同眼药水配方的疗效。共有 120 名确诊为干眼症的患者参与了这项研究。参与者被分配到三个治疗组中的一组:C组(环孢素 0.1%)、R组(瑞帕米特 2%)或 CC组(羧甲基纤维素和环孢素 0.05%的组合)。患者按规定服药六周。对患者进行基线评估,包括两周、四周和六周的泪液分泌时间(TFBUT)、使用 Schirmer 测试的泪液分泌评分,以及使用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评估干眼症状。通过适当的测试对收集到的数据进行分析,以比较三种眼药水配方在印度人群中治疗干眼症的效果。 根据施尔默评分、OSDI 评分和 TBUT,与基线相比,所有治疗组的疾病都有所改善。 在六周的治疗期内,所有三个治疗组的泪膜稳定性、泪液分泌量和干眼症状都有所改善。不过,还需要进行样本量更大、疗程更长的进一步研究,以确定这些疗法的长期疗效并进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidative stress in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy Learning curve of resident performed phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery at a regional ophthalmic institute in western India Dry eye in mask wearers among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic Macular thickness comparison in type II diabetic patients using optical coherence tomography: A case control study Clinical profile and management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary health care center, North Karnataka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1