Visual outcome and complications of phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract extraction for age related cataract

Garima Agrawal, Damini Patel
{"title":"Visual outcome and complications of phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract extraction for age related cataract","authors":"Garima Agrawal, Damini Patel","doi":"10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber IOL implantation (PC-IOL) and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation for age related cataract. The study compares the visual outcome and complications of MSICS and phacoemulsification with PC-IOL performed in 80 eyes at M & J Western Regional Institute of Ophthalmology (M&J WRIO) Ahmedabad, by assessing post operative Best corrected Visual acuity (BCVA), Surgically Induced astigmatism (SIA) and complications. This was an Institutional based cohort interventional randomized, prospective study. MSICS and Phacoemulsification was performed on 80 eyes at M & J WRIO. The intraoperative complications were documented. The parameters that were examined on 1 postoperative day, 1 week, and 6 weeks postoperatively included uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 weeks, intra ocular pressure by non -contact tonometry and keratometry at 6 weeks to rule out SIA.Statistical analysis was performed using chi square test. p value <0.05 was taken as significant.: MSICS & phacoemulsification had similar visual outcomes post-operatively. Phacoemulsification group produced less mean SIA (1.27 D) compared to MSICS group (1.29 D) and lesser (5%) complications than the MSICS group (10%). The comparison of all three parameters was not statistically significant between the two groups.: Visual outcomes, SIA and complications were comparably the same in MSICS & phacoemulsification. Therefore, MSICS can be excellent alternative to phacoemulsification.","PeriodicalId":13485,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber IOL implantation (PC-IOL) and phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation for age related cataract. The study compares the visual outcome and complications of MSICS and phacoemulsification with PC-IOL performed in 80 eyes at M & J Western Regional Institute of Ophthalmology (M&J WRIO) Ahmedabad, by assessing post operative Best corrected Visual acuity (BCVA), Surgically Induced astigmatism (SIA) and complications. This was an Institutional based cohort interventional randomized, prospective study. MSICS and Phacoemulsification was performed on 80 eyes at M & J WRIO. The intraoperative complications were documented. The parameters that were examined on 1 postoperative day, 1 week, and 6 weeks postoperatively included uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 weeks, intra ocular pressure by non -contact tonometry and keratometry at 6 weeks to rule out SIA.Statistical analysis was performed using chi square test. p value <0.05 was taken as significant.: MSICS & phacoemulsification had similar visual outcomes post-operatively. Phacoemulsification group produced less mean SIA (1.27 D) compared to MSICS group (1.29 D) and lesser (5%) complications than the MSICS group (10%). The comparison of all three parameters was not statistically significant between the two groups.: Visual outcomes, SIA and complications were comparably the same in MSICS & phacoemulsification. Therefore, MSICS can be excellent alternative to phacoemulsification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声乳化和人工小切口白内障摘除术治疗老年性白内障的视觉效果和并发症
本研究旨在比较人工小切口白内障手术(MSICS)与后房人工晶体植入术(PC-IOL)和超声乳化术与后房人工晶体植入术治疗老年性白内障的视觉效果和并发症。该研究通过评估术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、手术引起的散光(SIA)和并发症,比较了艾哈迈达巴德西部地区眼科研究所(M&J WRIO)为 80 只眼睛实施的 MSICS 和带 PC-IOL 的超声乳化术的视觉效果和并发症。这是一项以机构为基础的队列干预性随机前瞻性研究。在 M & J WRIO 对 80 只眼睛进行了 MSICS 和超声乳化手术。对术中并发症进行了记录。术后1天、1周和6周的检查参数包括未矫正视力、6周时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、非接触式眼压计测得的眼压和6周时的角膜度数,以排除SIA:MSICS和超声乳化术的术后视觉效果相似。与 MSICS 组(1.29 D)相比,超声乳化组产生的平均 SIA(1.27 D)较少,并发症(5%)少于 MSICS 组(10%)。两组所有三个参数的比较均无统计学意义:MSICS和超声乳化术的视觉效果、SIA和并发症相当。因此,MSICS可以很好地替代超声乳化术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidative stress in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy Learning curve of resident performed phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery at a regional ophthalmic institute in western India Dry eye in mask wearers among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic Macular thickness comparison in type II diabetic patients using optical coherence tomography: A case control study Clinical profile and management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary health care center, North Karnataka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1