Unveiling the Best-fit Model: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in Predicting Student Success

A. G. Daligcon, Jemima Priyadarshini, Lilibeth Rivera Decena
{"title":"Unveiling the Best-fit Model: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in Predicting Student Success","authors":"A. G. Daligcon, Jemima Priyadarshini, Lilibeth Rivera Decena","doi":"10.59461/ijitra.v3i1.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reduce failure and personalize instruction, educators work to predict student achievement. For this objective, this study compared several categorization techniques. The study investigated techniques employing datasets from Portuguese schools, even though various circumstances make it difficult to gather full data and achieve high accuracy. Upon evaluating the various algorithms, including Random Forest and Decision Trees, the study determined that Random Forest was the most successful model, attaining a 94.55% accuracy rate. This demonstrates how machine learning—more especially, Random Forest—could forecast student achievement. The study opens the door for applying these techniques to early interventions and personalized learning. But more work needs to be done, such as creating publicly accessible educational datasets and investigating different strategies like regression algorithms to manage the nuances of grading systems more effectively.","PeriodicalId":503010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Technology, Research and Applications","volume":"13 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Technology, Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59461/ijitra.v3i1.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reduce failure and personalize instruction, educators work to predict student achievement. For this objective, this study compared several categorization techniques. The study investigated techniques employing datasets from Portuguese schools, even though various circumstances make it difficult to gather full data and achieve high accuracy. Upon evaluating the various algorithms, including Random Forest and Decision Trees, the study determined that Random Forest was the most successful model, attaining a 94.55% accuracy rate. This demonstrates how machine learning—more especially, Random Forest—could forecast student achievement. The study opens the door for applying these techniques to early interventions and personalized learning. But more work needs to be done, such as creating publicly accessible educational datasets and investigating different strategies like regression algorithms to manage the nuances of grading systems more effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开最合适模型的面纱:预测学生成功的分类方法比较分析
为了减少失败和实现个性化教学,教育工作者努力预测学生的成绩。为此,本研究比较了几种分类技术。尽管在各种情况下很难收集到完整的数据并达到较高的准确性,但本研究还是采用了葡萄牙学校的数据集来研究各种技术。在对包括随机森林和决策树在内的各种算法进行评估后,研究确定随机森林是最成功的模型,准确率达到 94.55%。这表明机器学习--尤其是随机森林--可以预测学生的成绩。这项研究为将这些技术应用于早期干预和个性化学习打开了大门。但我们还需要做更多的工作,比如创建可公开访问的教育数据集,研究不同的策略,如回归算法,以更有效地管理评分系统的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensemble Approach for Predicting The Price of Residential Property Smart Agriculture: A Comprehensive Survey on IoT-Enabled Plant Disease Detection and Agricultural Automation Integrating Technical Indicators and Ensemble Learning for Predicting the Opening Stock Price Unveiling the Best-fit Model: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods in Predicting Student Success Analysis Of Inhibiting Factors Implementation Of Electronic Medical Records In East Pamulang Community Health Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1