Intolerance of uncertainty predicts indecisiveness and safety behavior in real-life decision making: Results from an experience sampling study

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104490
Helmut Appel , Julia Krasko , Maike Luhmann , Alexander L. Gerlach
{"title":"Intolerance of uncertainty predicts indecisiveness and safety behavior in real-life decision making: Results from an experience sampling study","authors":"Helmut Appel ,&nbsp;Julia Krasko ,&nbsp;Maike Luhmann ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Gerlach","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In decision making, intolerance of uncertainty (IU) may be linked to safety behavior, which could ironically maintain IU and, thus, foster indecisiveness. In a smartphone-based experience sampling study, 247 participants described their real-life decisions six times per day and rated (a) their situational indecisiveness, (b) decision characteristics, (c) situational IU, and (d) problematic safety behaviors. Participants higher in dispositional IU reported more indecisiveness and engaged in more problematic safety behavior across measurements. The same relationships were observed with situational IU at the level of individual measurements. Engaging in more problematic safety behaviors during the first days predicted indecisiveness on the last day, mediated by IU. The results demonstrate the real-life relevance of the relationship between IU, indecisiveness, and safety behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000382/pdfft?md5=9f092953545ce88d8ebe5c10e351b44f&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000382-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In decision making, intolerance of uncertainty (IU) may be linked to safety behavior, which could ironically maintain IU and, thus, foster indecisiveness. In a smartphone-based experience sampling study, 247 participants described their real-life decisions six times per day and rated (a) their situational indecisiveness, (b) decision characteristics, (c) situational IU, and (d) problematic safety behaviors. Participants higher in dispositional IU reported more indecisiveness and engaged in more problematic safety behavior across measurements. The same relationships were observed with situational IU at the level of individual measurements. Engaging in more problematic safety behaviors during the first days predicted indecisiveness on the last day, mediated by IU. The results demonstrate the real-life relevance of the relationship between IU, indecisiveness, and safety behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不确定性的不容忍度可预测现实决策中的优柔寡断和安全行为:经验取样研究的结果
在决策过程中,对不确定性的不容忍度(IU)可能与安全行为有关,而安全行为可能会具有讽刺意味地维持不确定性,从而助长优柔寡断。在一项基于智能手机的经验取样研究中,247 名参与者每天六次描述他们在现实生活中做出的决定,并对以下方面进行评分:(a)他们的情境优柔寡断性;(b)决策特征;(c)情境 IU;以及(d)有问题的安全行为。倾向性 IU 值较高的受试者在各次测量中表现出更多的优柔寡断,并参与了更多有问题的安全行为。在个人测量水平上,也观察到了与情境性 IU 的相同关系。在前几天参与更多有问题的安全行为可以预测最后一天的优柔寡断,而这是由 IU 调解的。这些结果表明,IU、优柔寡断和安全行为之间的关系与现实生活息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
Agentic collective narcissism and communal collective narcissism: Do they predict COVID-19 pandemic-related beliefs and behaviors? Optimism and pessimism were prospectively associated with adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data An investigation testing the perceptual advantage of Sensory Processing Sensitivity and its associations with the Big Five personality traits Self/observer agreement in personality assessment by observers’ relationship types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1