The decline in the labor share: Evidence from Japanese manufacturers’ panel data

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Asian Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101739
Koyo Miyoshi
{"title":"The decline in the labor share: Evidence from Japanese manufacturers’ panel data","authors":"Koyo Miyoshi","doi":"10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper replicates Kehrig and Vincent (2021) using Japanese data and tests whether the overall labor share decline is led by an increase in low-labor-share firms. The results can be summarized as follows. First, although the labor share of median firms did not rise while the overall labor share was declining, the rate of decline in the labor share of the median firm was slower than the overall rate of decline. Second, the value-added share of firms with a low labor share increased while their salary share did not increase when the overall labor share declined. Third, entry and exit are not important to the decline in overall labor share, as in the United States. Fourth, the role of firms with an extremely low labor share, say under decile, which is a good explanation of the change in labor share in the United States, is limited in Japan. Fifth, the change in actual labor share is very similar to <span><math><mrow><mo>∑</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>l</mi></mrow></msub><msub><mrow><mi>λ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>, the product of the initial value-added share and labor share at the time. Sixth, firms that increased their value-added share tended to decrease their labor share.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Economics","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper replicates Kehrig and Vincent (2021) using Japanese data and tests whether the overall labor share decline is led by an increase in low-labor-share firms. The results can be summarized as follows. First, although the labor share of median firms did not rise while the overall labor share was declining, the rate of decline in the labor share of the median firm was slower than the overall rate of decline. Second, the value-added share of firms with a low labor share increased while their salary share did not increase when the overall labor share declined. Third, entry and exit are not important to the decline in overall labor share, as in the United States. Fourth, the role of firms with an extremely low labor share, say under decile, which is a good explanation of the change in labor share in the United States, is limited in Japan. Fifth, the change in actual labor share is very similar to ωi,initialλit, the product of the initial value-added share and labor share at the time. Sixth, firms that increased their value-added share tended to decrease their labor share.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动份额的下降:来自日本制造商面板数据的证据
本文利用日本的数据复制了 Kehrig 和 Vincent(2021 年)的研究,并检验了低劳动份额企业的增加是否导致了整体劳动份额的下降。结果可归纳如下。首先,虽然中位数企业的劳动份额在整体劳动份额下降时没有上升,但中位数企业劳动份额的下降速度低于整体下降速度。其次,在整体劳动力份额下降时,劳动力份额低的企业的增值份额增加了,而其工资份额却没有增加。第三,与美国的情况一样,进入和退出对总体劳动力份额的下降并不重要。第四,劳动份额极低的企业,如十分之一以下的企业,在美国可以很好地解释劳动份额的变化,但在日本,其作用有限。第五,实际劳动份额的变化与∑ωi,initλit(初始附加值份额与当时劳动份额的乘积)非常相似。第六,增加附加值份额的企业往往会减少劳动力份额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Economics provides a forum for publication of increasingly growing research in Asian economic studies and a unique forum for continental Asian economic studies with focus on (i) special studies in adaptive innovation paradigms in Asian economic regimes, (ii) studies relative to unique dimensions of Asian economic development paradigm, as they are investigated by researchers, (iii) comparative studies of development paradigms in other developing continents, Latin America and Africa, (iv) the emerging new pattern of comparative advantages between Asian countries and the United States and North America.
期刊最新文献
The information externality of public firms’ employment in the municipal corporate bond market in China Cross-border personnel mobility and bilateral value chain linkages: Evidence from visa liberalization in China Can development zones reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions of enterprises? Evidence from China Does parental migration matter in access to academic high schools for left-behind children in China? Labor union effects on wage dispersion: Evidence from panel data of Japanese listed companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1