Characterization of Lithfacies Properties of Carbonate Reservoir rocks using Machine Learning Techniques

Ghareb M. Hamada, Abbas M. Al-khudafi, Hamzah A. Al-Sharifi, Ibrahim A. Farea, Salem O. Baarimah, Abdelrigeeb A. Al-Gathe, Mohamed A. Bamaga
{"title":"Characterization of Lithfacies Properties of Carbonate Reservoir rocks using Machine Learning Techniques","authors":"Ghareb M. Hamada, Abbas M. Al-khudafi, Hamzah A. Al-Sharifi, Ibrahim A. Farea, Salem O. Baarimah, Abdelrigeeb A. Al-Gathe, Mohamed A. Bamaga","doi":"10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess the effectiveness of several decision tree machine techniques for identifying formation lithology of complex carbonate reservoir rocks in Gamal oil field. A total of 20966 log data points from four wells were used to create the study's data. Lithology is determined using seven log parameters. The seven log parameters are the density log, neutron log, sonic log, gamma ray log, deep lateral log, shallow lateral log, and resistivity log. Different decision tree-based algorithms for classification approaches were applied. Several typical machine learning models, namely the, Random Forest. Random trees, J48, reduced-error pruning decision trees, logistic model trees, Hoeffding Tree were assessed using well logging data for formation lithology prediction. The obtained results show that the random forest model, out of the proposed decision tree models, performed best at lithology identification, with precession, recall, and F-score values of 0.913, 0.914, and 0.913, respectively. Random trees came next. with average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.837, 0.84, and 0.837, respectively, the J48 model came in third place. The Hoeffding Tree classification model, however, showed the worst performance. We conclude that boosting strategies enhance the performance of tree-based models. Evaluation of prediction capability of models is also carried out using different datasets","PeriodicalId":34437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","volume":"273 29‐32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of several decision tree machine techniques for identifying formation lithology of complex carbonate reservoir rocks in Gamal oil field. A total of 20966 log data points from four wells were used to create the study's data. Lithology is determined using seven log parameters. The seven log parameters are the density log, neutron log, sonic log, gamma ray log, deep lateral log, shallow lateral log, and resistivity log. Different decision tree-based algorithms for classification approaches were applied. Several typical machine learning models, namely the, Random Forest. Random trees, J48, reduced-error pruning decision trees, logistic model trees, Hoeffding Tree were assessed using well logging data for formation lithology prediction. The obtained results show that the random forest model, out of the proposed decision tree models, performed best at lithology identification, with precession, recall, and F-score values of 0.913, 0.914, and 0.913, respectively. Random trees came next. with average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.837, 0.84, and 0.837, respectively, the J48 model came in third place. The Hoeffding Tree classification model, however, showed the worst performance. We conclude that boosting strategies enhance the performance of tree-based models. Evaluation of prediction capability of models is also carried out using different datasets
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习技术确定碳酸盐岩储层岩石的岩相特征
本研究旨在评估几种决策树机器技术在识别加马尔油田复杂碳酸盐岩储层岩性方面的有效性。研究数据共使用了四口井的 20966 个测井数据点。岩性是通过七个测井参数确定的。这七个测井参数是密度测井、中子测井、声波测井、伽马射线测井、深侧向测井、浅侧向测井和电阻率测井。分类方法采用了不同的决策树算法。几种典型的机器学习模型,即随机森林(Random Forest)、随机树(Random Tree)、J48、还原树(reduced Tree)。使用测井数据评估了随机树、J48、减少误差修剪决策树、逻辑模型树、Hoeffding 树等用于地层岩性预测的机器学习模型。结果表明,在所提出的决策树模型中,随机森林模型在岩性识别方面表现最佳,其前程、召回和 F 分数值分别为 0.913、0.914 和 0.913。随机树次之,平均精度、召回率和 F1 分数分别为 0.837、0.84 和 0.837,J48 模型排名第三。然而,Hoeffding 树分类模型的表现最差。我们的结论是,提升策略提高了基于树的模型的性能。我们还使用不同的数据集对各模型的预测能力进行了评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Maximizing CO2-EOR Potential for Carbonate Reservoir, Horus Field, Western Desert, Egypt A review on the Use Nano Technology for Enhancing Compressive Strength of Cement in Oil and Gas Industry. Reducing Well Deliverability Time and Drilling Costs using Casing While Drilling Operations, West Kuwait A Comprehensive Review of Traditional, Modern and Advanced Presplit Drilling and Blasting in the Mining and Construction Industries Investigation into the Use of Thevetia Peruviana seed oil for Surfactant Flooding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1