Risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales among hospitalized patients in Guatemala: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) study

IF 1.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES IJID regions Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100361
Mark A. Caudell , Carmen Castillo , Lucas F. Santos , Laura Grajeda , Juan Carlos Romero , Maria Renee Lopez , Sylvia Omulo , Mariangeli Freitas Ning , Guy H. Palmer , Douglas R. Call , Celia Cordon-Rosales , Rachel M. Smith , Carolyn T.A. Herzig , Ashley Styczynski , Brooke M. Ramay
{"title":"Risk factors for colonization with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales among hospitalized patients in Guatemala: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) study","authors":"Mark A. Caudell ,&nbsp;Carmen Castillo ,&nbsp;Lucas F. Santos ,&nbsp;Laura Grajeda ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Romero ,&nbsp;Maria Renee Lopez ,&nbsp;Sylvia Omulo ,&nbsp;Mariangeli Freitas Ning ,&nbsp;Guy H. Palmer ,&nbsp;Douglas R. Call ,&nbsp;Celia Cordon-Rosales ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Smith ,&nbsp;Carolyn T.A. Herzig ,&nbsp;Ashley Styczynski ,&nbsp;Brooke M. Ramay","doi":"10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The spread of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (ESCrE) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has resulted in increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs worldwide. To identify the factors associated with ESCrE and CRE colonization within hospitals, we enrolled hospitalized patients at a regional hospital located in Guatemala.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Stool samples were collected from randomly selected patients using a cross-sectional study design (March-September, 2021), and samples were tested for the presence of ESCrE and CRE. Hospital-based and household variables were examined for associations with ESCrE and CRE colonization using lasso regression models, clustered by ward (n = 21).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 641 patients were enrolled, of whom complete data sets were available for 593. Colonization with ESCrE (72.3%, n = 429/593) was negatively associated with carbapenem administration (odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.42) and positively associated with ceftriaxone administration (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.53), as was reported hospital admission within 30 days of the current hospitalization (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.19-6.80). Colonization with CRE (34.6%, n = 205 of 593) was associated with carbapenem administration (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.39-4.97), reported previous hospital admission within 30 days of current hospitalization (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.17-5.72), hospitalization in wards with more patients (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), hospitalization for ≥4 days (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.72-5.46), and intubation (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.13-5.59). No household-based variables were associated with ESCrE or CRE colonization in hospitalized patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The hospital-based risk factors identified in this study are similar to what has been reported for risk of health care–associated infections, consistent with colonization being driven by hospital settings rather than community factors. This also suggests that colonization with ESCrE and CRE could be a useful metric to evaluate the efficacy of infection and prevention control programs in clinics and hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73335,"journal":{"name":"IJID regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000328/pdfft?md5=64b828b11ec8b4ce4735642b53b44768&pid=1-s2.0-S2772707624000328-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772707624000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The spread of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (ESCrE) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has resulted in increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs worldwide. To identify the factors associated with ESCrE and CRE colonization within hospitals, we enrolled hospitalized patients at a regional hospital located in Guatemala.

Methods

Stool samples were collected from randomly selected patients using a cross-sectional study design (March-September, 2021), and samples were tested for the presence of ESCrE and CRE. Hospital-based and household variables were examined for associations with ESCrE and CRE colonization using lasso regression models, clustered by ward (n = 21).

Results

A total of 641 patients were enrolled, of whom complete data sets were available for 593. Colonization with ESCrE (72.3%, n = 429/593) was negatively associated with carbapenem administration (odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.42) and positively associated with ceftriaxone administration (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.53), as was reported hospital admission within 30 days of the current hospitalization (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.19-6.80). Colonization with CRE (34.6%, n = 205 of 593) was associated with carbapenem administration (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.39-4.97), reported previous hospital admission within 30 days of current hospitalization (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.17-5.72), hospitalization in wards with more patients (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), hospitalization for ≥4 days (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.72-5.46), and intubation (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.13-5.59). No household-based variables were associated with ESCrE or CRE colonization in hospitalized patients.

Conclusion

The hospital-based risk factors identified in this study are similar to what has been reported for risk of health care–associated infections, consistent with colonization being driven by hospital settings rather than community factors. This also suggests that colonization with ESCrE and CRE could be a useful metric to evaluate the efficacy of infection and prevention control programs in clinics and hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危地马拉住院病人中耐广谱头孢菌素和耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌定植的风险因素:社区和医院的抗生素耐药性(ARCH)研究
目的耐广谱头孢菌素肠杆菌(ESCRE)和耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)的传播已导致全球发病率、死亡率和医疗费用的增加。为了确定与医院内ESCrE和CRE定植相关的因素,我们在危地马拉的一家地区医院招募了住院患者。方法采用横断面研究设计(2021年3月至9月)从随机挑选的患者中收集工具样本,并检测样本中是否存在ESCrE和CRE。使用拉索回归模型检测医院和家庭变量与 ESCrE 和 CRE 定植的相关性,按病房分组(n = 21)。ESCrE定植(72.3%,n = 429/593)与碳青霉烯类用药呈负相关(比值比 [OR] 0.21,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.11-0.42),与头孢曲松用药呈正相关(OR 1.61,95% CI 1.02-2.53),与本次住院 30 天内的入院报告呈正相关(OR 2.84,95% CI 1.19-6.80)。CRE菌落(34.6%,593 例中的 205 例)与使用碳青霉烯类药物(OR 2.62,95% CI 1.39-4.97)、本次住院后 30 天内入院(OR 2.58,95% CI 1.17-5.72)、在病人较多的病房住院(OR 1.05,95% CI 1.02-1.08)、住院时间≥4 天(OR 3.07,95% CI 1.72-5.46)和插管(OR 2.51,95% CI 1.13-5.59)。本研究中发现的医院风险因素与已报道的医疗相关感染风险因素相似,这表明定植是由医院环境而非社区因素驱动的。这也表明,ESCrE 和 CRE 定植可作为评估诊所和医院感染和预防控制项目效果的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IJID regions
IJID regions Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Outbreak of severe acute respiratory infections caused by recombinant human adenovirus type B 7/3 in hospitalized infants from a nursery in Dakar, April 2024 The incidence, clinical features and outcome of urinary tract infections in geriatric patients: A prospective longitudinal study Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for the management of periprosthetic joint infections in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) from 2013 to 2021 Mal'aria in the Republic of Ireland; A retrospective review of the clinical epidemiology of mal'aria between 2016 and 2020 High incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Bhutan: A cohort study based on national TB surveillance data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1