Complications associated with postoperative stiffness following primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.012
Lawrence C. Vanderham MS, PA, Nikhil Vallabhaneni BA, Skye Jacobson BS, Jacqueline G. Tobin MS, Alexander S. Guareschi BS, Josef K. Eichinger MD, Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC
{"title":"Complications associated with postoperative stiffness following primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Lawrence C. Vanderham MS, PA,&nbsp;Nikhil Vallabhaneni BA,&nbsp;Skye Jacobson BS,&nbsp;Jacqueline G. Tobin MS,&nbsp;Alexander S. Guareschi BS,&nbsp;Josef K. Eichinger MD,&nbsp;Richard J. Friedman MD, FRCSC","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Shoulder stiffness following both primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a potential complication that is likely underreported. The deleterious effects of postoperative stiffness following TSA and the burden placed on both the patient and the healthcare system have not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of postoperative stiffness following primary TSA and analyze the effect it has on short-term outcomes up to 180 days following primary TSA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2020 for patients who had undergone primary TSA using International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System codes. Patients were then separated into stiff and non-stiff cohorts. A one-to-one match was performed based on age, sex, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Statistical analyses included chi-square, sample <em>t</em>-tests, logistic, and linear regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7792 subjects were included in the study. The overall incidence of postoperative stiffness was 1.8%. Patients with stiffness following primary TSA were 57% more likely to be readmitted within 180 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57) and had increased hospital costs by over $5000 (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), but mortality rates were not increased. However, the odds of experiencing any medical complication or revision decreased by 52% and 76%, respectively, in the stiff group (OR = 0.48, and OR = 0.24, respectively). Postoperative stiffness was inversely predictive of prosthetic dislocation (OR = 0.03), loosening (OR = 0.03), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The incidence of postoperative stiffness following primary TSA was low at 1.8 %. These patients were found to be at increased risk for readmission within 180 days and incurred significantly higher hospital costs compared to the non-stiff cohort. However, postoperative stiffness did not increase the odds of experiencing increased medical complications, mechanical complications, mortality, or revision at 180 days. This information can help guide surgeons in discussion with and management of patients who develop stiffness following primary TSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 464-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Shoulder stiffness following both primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a potential complication that is likely underreported. The deleterious effects of postoperative stiffness following TSA and the burden placed on both the patient and the healthcare system have not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of postoperative stiffness following primary TSA and analyze the effect it has on short-term outcomes up to 180 days following primary TSA.

Methods

This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2020 for patients who had undergone primary TSA using International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System codes. Patients were then separated into stiff and non-stiff cohorts. A one-to-one match was performed based on age, sex, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Statistical analyses included chi-square, sample t-tests, logistic, and linear regression.

Results

A total of 7792 subjects were included in the study. The overall incidence of postoperative stiffness was 1.8%. Patients with stiffness following primary TSA were 57% more likely to be readmitted within 180 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57) and had increased hospital costs by over $5000 (P < .001), but mortality rates were not increased. However, the odds of experiencing any medical complication or revision decreased by 52% and 76%, respectively, in the stiff group (OR = 0.48, and OR = 0.24, respectively). Postoperative stiffness was inversely predictive of prosthetic dislocation (OR = 0.03), loosening (OR = 0.03), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.04).

Conclusion

The incidence of postoperative stiffness following primary TSA was low at 1.8 %. These patients were found to be at increased risk for readmission within 180 days and incurred significantly higher hospital costs compared to the non-stiff cohort. However, postoperative stiffness did not increase the odds of experiencing increased medical complications, mechanical complications, mortality, or revision at 180 days. This information can help guide surgeons in discussion with and management of patients who develop stiffness following primary TSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与原位解剖和反向全肩关节置换术后僵硬有关的并发症
背景原位解剖和反向全肩关节置换术(TSA)后肩关节僵硬是一种潜在的并发症,但很可能未得到充分报道。关于 TSA 术后肩关节僵硬的有害影响以及给患者和医疗系统造成的负担,目前还没有很好的研究。本研究的目的是确定原发性 TSA 术后僵硬的发生率,并分析其对原发性 TSA 术后 180 天内短期预后的影响。利用国际疾病分类临床修改和程序编码系统代码查询了2010年至2020年期间全国再入院数据库中接受过原发性TSA手术的患者。然后将患者分为僵硬组群和非僵硬组群。根据年龄、性别和 Charlson 合并症指数进行一对一匹配。统计分析包括卡方检验、样本 t 检验、逻辑回归和线性回归。术后僵硬的总发生率为 1.8%。初次 TSA 术后出现僵硬的患者在 180 天内再次入院的几率比常人高出 57%(几率比 [OR] = 1.57),住院费用也增加了 5000 多美元(P <.001),但死亡率并没有增加。不过,在僵硬组中,出现任何医疗并发症或翻修的几率分别降低了 52% 和 76%(OR = 0.48 和 OR = 0.24)。术后僵硬与假体脱位(OR = 0.03)、松动(OR = 0.03)和假体周围骨折(OR = 0.04)呈反向预测关系。与非僵硬患者相比,这些患者在 180 天内再次入院的风险增加,住院费用也明显增加。不过,术后僵硬并不会增加患者在180天内出现更多医疗并发症、机械并发症、死亡率或翻修的几率。这些信息有助于指导外科医生与初诊 TSA 术后出现僵硬的患者进行讨论并对其进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1