Improved Patient Outcomes with Electrocauterization Following Wedge Resection and Curettage for Ingrown Toenails: A Prospective Comparative Study

Marzouq Amarin, Raed Al-Taher, Khaled Daradka, Amal Ibraheem Abd al Qader Abu Harb, R. Habashneh, N. Bustami, Yazan Hijazein, Hiba Hadadin, S. Al-Najjar
{"title":"Improved Patient Outcomes with Electrocauterization Following Wedge Resection and Curettage for Ingrown Toenails: A Prospective Comparative Study","authors":"Marzouq Amarin, Raed Al-Taher, Khaled Daradka, Amal Ibraheem Abd al Qader Abu Harb, R. Habashneh, N. Bustami, Yazan Hijazein, Hiba Hadadin, S. Al-Najjar","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Ingrown toenail is a common condition that results in chronic pain, recurrent infections, and difficulty in performing daily activities. Our aim is to compare two surgical methods for the treatment of ingrown toenails: wedge resection with curetting versus wedge resection curetting followed by electrocauterization of the nail bed.\n Methods A prospective, comparative study that included 130 patients with ingrown toenails. All patients had stage II or III disease. We divided the participants into two groups according to the type of surgery and all patients were followed up for 6 months. The outcomes measured were the incidence of postoperative bleeding and infection, recovery time, patient satisfaction, and recurrence rate 6 months after surgery.\n Results Of the 130 patients included, 59 (45.4%) underwent excision and curetting of the nail matrix (group 1) and 71 (54.6%) underwent excision, curetting, and electrocauterization of the nail matrix (group 2). The postoperative infection rates were 20.3 and 4.2% in the first and second groups, respectively (p = 0.004). Patient satisfaction was 76.3% among the first group, while 91.5% of patients in the second group were satisfied with the results of surgery. Six months postoperatively, recurrence rates were 25.4 and 4.2% in the first and second groups, respectively (p = 0.001).\n Conclusion Wedge excision and curettage, followed by electrocauterization of the ingrown toenail is a safe treatment modality with a high success rate, that is evident by a lower recurrence rate, and greater patient satisfaction, with no effect on postoperative pain score or recovery time.","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Ingrown toenail is a common condition that results in chronic pain, recurrent infections, and difficulty in performing daily activities. Our aim is to compare two surgical methods for the treatment of ingrown toenails: wedge resection with curetting versus wedge resection curetting followed by electrocauterization of the nail bed. Methods A prospective, comparative study that included 130 patients with ingrown toenails. All patients had stage II or III disease. We divided the participants into two groups according to the type of surgery and all patients were followed up for 6 months. The outcomes measured were the incidence of postoperative bleeding and infection, recovery time, patient satisfaction, and recurrence rate 6 months after surgery. Results Of the 130 patients included, 59 (45.4%) underwent excision and curetting of the nail matrix (group 1) and 71 (54.6%) underwent excision, curetting, and electrocauterization of the nail matrix (group 2). The postoperative infection rates were 20.3 and 4.2% in the first and second groups, respectively (p = 0.004). Patient satisfaction was 76.3% among the first group, while 91.5% of patients in the second group were satisfied with the results of surgery. Six months postoperatively, recurrence rates were 25.4 and 4.2% in the first and second groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion Wedge excision and curettage, followed by electrocauterization of the ingrown toenail is a safe treatment modality with a high success rate, that is evident by a lower recurrence rate, and greater patient satisfaction, with no effect on postoperative pain score or recovery time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
楔形切除术和刮除术治疗嵌甲后使用电灼法可改善患者疗效:前瞻性比较研究
背景 内生趾甲是一种常见病,会导致慢性疼痛、反复感染和日常活动困难。我们的目的是比较两种治疗内生趾甲的手术方法:楔形切除加刮治与楔形切除刮治后再电灼甲床。方法 这是一项前瞻性比较研究,共纳入 130 名脚趾甲内生患者。所有患者的病情均为 II 期或 III 期。我们根据手术类型将参与者分为两组,并对所有患者进行了为期 6 个月的随访。测量的结果包括术后出血和感染的发生率、恢复时间、患者满意度以及术后 6 个月的复发率。结果 在纳入的 130 名患者中,59 人(45.4%)接受了甲基质切除术和甲基质刮治术(第 1 组),71 人(54.6%)接受了甲基质切除术、甲基质刮治术和电灼术(第 2 组)。第一组和第二组的术后感染率分别为 20.3% 和 4.2%(P = 0.004)。第一组患者的满意度为 76.3%,而第二组患者的满意度为 91.5%。术后六个月,第一组和第二组的复发率分别为 25.4% 和 4.2%(P = 0.001)。结论 楔形切除术和刮除术后电灼治疗嵌生趾甲是一种安全的治疗方式,成功率高,复发率低,患者满意度高,对术后疼痛评分和恢复时间没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Guidelines and Technical Tips for Neck Aesthetics with Botulinum Toxin Comparison of Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap on Radiation-induced Peri-implant Capsular Contracture in a Rabbit Model Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview Case series and literature review of up-to-date surgical management of occipital neuralgia Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1