Examining the Effects of Project and Resource-Based Teaching Methods on Social Intelligence, Metacognitive Thinking and Academic Achievement

Q3 Social Sciences Participatory Educational Research Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.17275/per.24.25.11.2
Cengiz Gündüzalp, Yuksel Göktas
{"title":"Examining the Effects of Project and Resource-Based Teaching Methods on Social Intelligence, Metacognitive Thinking and Academic Achievement","authors":"Cengiz Gündüzalp, Yuksel Göktas","doi":"10.17275/per.24.25.11.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to reveal the effects of project- and resource-based teaching methods on student teachers' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking skills, and academic achievements. A pretest-posttest control group design, a quasi-experimental method, was used in the study. The study used the purposeful sampling method to determine the study group. The study group consists of four different groups. The study analyzed the collected data by MANOVA and paired samples t-test. The findings obtained from the study showed that there was a significant difference in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied. In the study, it was understood that the group to which PBTM was applied was more successful than the other groups in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievements. It was observed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores regarding the metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement of the group to which PBTM was applied. On the other hand, it was determined that there was no significant difference in terms of the scores regarding social intelligence levels between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied in the study. It was observed that there was no significant difference between the social intelligence variable pre-test and post-test scores of the groups. In conclusion, the study revealed that different teaching methods used in lessons affected students' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking and academic achievement at different levels.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":"28 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.25.11.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the effects of project- and resource-based teaching methods on student teachers' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking skills, and academic achievements. A pretest-posttest control group design, a quasi-experimental method, was used in the study. The study used the purposeful sampling method to determine the study group. The study group consists of four different groups. The study analyzed the collected data by MANOVA and paired samples t-test. The findings obtained from the study showed that there was a significant difference in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied. In the study, it was understood that the group to which PBTM was applied was more successful than the other groups in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievements. It was observed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores regarding the metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement of the group to which PBTM was applied. On the other hand, it was determined that there was no significant difference in terms of the scores regarding social intelligence levels between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied in the study. It was observed that there was no significant difference between the social intelligence variable pre-test and post-test scores of the groups. In conclusion, the study revealed that different teaching methods used in lessons affected students' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking and academic achievement at different levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究项目教学法和基于资源的教学法对社会智能、元认知思维和学习成绩的影响
本研究旨在揭示项目教学法和资源教学法对师范生的社会智力、元认知思维能力和学业成绩的影响。研究采用了前测-后测对照组设计,即准实验法。研究采用有目的的抽样方法确定研究组。研究组由四个不同的小组组成。研究通过 MANOVA 和配对样本 t 检验对收集到的数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,采用不同教学方法的小组在元认知思维能力和学业成绩方面存在显著差异。据了解,在元认知思维能力和学业成绩方面,采用 PBTM 的小组比其他小组更成功。据观察,应用 PBTM 的小组在元认知思维能力和学业成绩方面的前测成绩和后测成绩之间存在显著差异。另一方面,研究发现,采用不同教学方法的小组在社会智力水平方面的得分没有显著差异。据观察,各组的社会智力变量前测得分和后测得分没有明显差异。总之,研究表明,课堂上使用的不同教学方法对学生的社会智力、元认知思维和学业成绩产生了不同程度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
期刊最新文献
Determination of Teacher Qualifications from the Perspective of Stakeholders: Rubric Development Study Augmented Reality in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review Fostering Safe Schools: Empowering Educators and Parents in the Fight Against Violence in Early Childhood Education Setting The Effect of Mathematics Teaching with Mobile Augmented Reality Technology on Secondary School Students’ Attitudes and Academic Achievements The Effect of Computer-Supported Stem Applications on Secondary Students' Achievement and Computational Thinking Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1