Business In (Action): The International Chamber of Commerce and Climate Change from Stockholm to Rio

A. Bergquist, Thomas David
{"title":"Business In (Action): The International Chamber of Commerce and Climate Change from Stockholm to Rio","authors":"A. Bergquist, Thomas David","doi":"10.33063/upeh.v3i.592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper engages with the literature that has looked at the historical response to climate change among industries positioned to have had a far-reaching impact on changing the course of the climate crisis. While much of the historical research in this domain has focused on the role of big oil companies, the utility industry and conservative think tanks in the manufacturing of doubt regarding climate science and opposing ambitions climate policies, our focus is on the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – the world’s largest transnational business association. Unlike individual multinational corporations, the ICC developed a close ties and collaborations with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which made ICC positioned to influence international policy discussions. This study finds that the ICC developed a dual strategy, which set aside climate change as the focus for discussion and business action. One strategy, led by ICC Environment Committee, involved intense collaboration with the United Nations and developing a business agenda for sustainable development. At the same time, the creation of the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 and the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change (INC) in 1991, gave rise to a parallel strategy, led by ICC’s related oil companies. As this study finds, the ICC’s Energy Committee developed close ties to the Global Climate Coalition, a front group designed to combat the scientific evidence of climate change.  The paper concludes that the ICC was able to delay meaningful regulatory response to climate change the between 1988-1992 by forming a broad coalition of competing interests and collaborating with agencies established under the auspices of the United Nations.","PeriodicalId":307085,"journal":{"name":"Uppsala Papers in Economic History","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uppsala Papers in Economic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33063/upeh.v3i.592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper engages with the literature that has looked at the historical response to climate change among industries positioned to have had a far-reaching impact on changing the course of the climate crisis. While much of the historical research in this domain has focused on the role of big oil companies, the utility industry and conservative think tanks in the manufacturing of doubt regarding climate science and opposing ambitions climate policies, our focus is on the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – the world’s largest transnational business association. Unlike individual multinational corporations, the ICC developed a close ties and collaborations with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which made ICC positioned to influence international policy discussions. This study finds that the ICC developed a dual strategy, which set aside climate change as the focus for discussion and business action. One strategy, led by ICC Environment Committee, involved intense collaboration with the United Nations and developing a business agenda for sustainable development. At the same time, the creation of the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 and the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change (INC) in 1991, gave rise to a parallel strategy, led by ICC’s related oil companies. As this study finds, the ICC’s Energy Committee developed close ties to the Global Climate Coalition, a front group designed to combat the scientific evidence of climate change.  The paper concludes that the ICC was able to delay meaningful regulatory response to climate change the between 1988-1992 by forming a broad coalition of competing interests and collaborating with agencies established under the auspices of the United Nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业(行动):从斯德哥尔摩到里约,国际商会与气候变化
本文涉及的文献研究了历史上那些对改变气候危机进程具有深远影响的行业对气候变化的反应。这一领域的历史研究大多集中于大石油公司、公用事业行业和保守智库在制造对气候科学的怀疑和反对雄心勃勃的气候政策方面所扮演的角色,而我们的重点则是世界上最大的跨国商业协会--国际商会(ICC)。与单个跨国公司不同,国际商会与联合国环境规划署(UNEP)建立了密切的联系与合作,这使得国际商会有能力影响国际政策讨论。本研究发现,国际商会制定了双重战略,将气候变化作为讨论和商业行动的重点。其中一项战略由国际商会环境委员会领导,涉及与联合国的紧密合作以及制定可持续发展的商业议程。与此同时,1988 年成立的国际气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)和 1991 年成立的气候变化框架公约政府间谈判委员会(INC)催生了由国际商会相关石油公司领导的平行战略。本研究发现,国际商会的能源委员会与全球气候联盟(Global Climate Coalition)建立了密切联系,后者是一个旨在打击气候变化科学证据的前沿组织。 本文的结论是,1988-1992 年间,国际商会通过组建一个广泛的利益竞争联盟,并与在联合国主持下成立的机构合作,推迟了对气候变化做出有意义的监管回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Industry restructuring and environmental performance – Decomposing the drivers of water pollution reduction in the Swedish pulp and paper industry, 1969-1989 Business In (Action): The International Chamber of Commerce and Climate Change from Stockholm to Rio A virtuous debtor: South Korea in the Eurocurrency market, 1969 – 1984 How Deep are the Roots of Swedish Egalitarianism? A multidimensional approach Replacing bank money with base money: Lessons for CBDCs from the ending of private banknotes in Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1