Enterobius vermicularis infection at time of appendicectomy: is it a neglected risk factor?

Bethany K. Matthews, Michael Auld
{"title":"Enterobius vermicularis infection at time of appendicectomy: is it a neglected risk factor?","authors":"Bethany K. Matthews, Michael Auld","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obstruction of the appendiceal orifice is well established as a potential cause of appendicitis. However, it remains debated as to if appendiceal orifice obstruction secondary to Enterobius vermicularis is considered a risk factor for appendicitis or appendiceal colic. Enterobius vermicularis maintains an increased prevalence within lower socioeconomic and human development index regions. Whilst Australia has an overall high human development index it has significant variability in health literacy and socioeconomics. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the relationship between Enterobius vermicularis and appendicitis, to review the prevalence of Enterobius vermicularis appendicectomies in lower human development index and socioeconomic status communities, and to review the Australian based Enterobius vermicularis literature available. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to review the prevalence of Enterobius vermicularis at time of appendicectomy. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were investigated for applicable studies published until December 2023. Enterobius vermicularis within the appendiceal lumen may cause irritation and lymphoid hyperplasia resulting in appendiceal colic with a similar clinical presentation to that of acute appendicitis. An increased association between Enterobius vermicularis, low human development index, and socioeconomic status is suggested. Public health interventions reduce Enterobius prevalence. A single Australian based study from 1994 was identified. Enterobius vermicularis infection is a neglected risk factor for appendiceal colic. A high index of suspicion for Enterobius vermicularis infection should be taken for clinically stable patients with normal inflammatory biochemistry and low human development index. Further research is required to assess if there is a disparity in Enterobius vermicularis in relation to human development index, socioeconomic status, and remoteness within Australian communities.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstruction of the appendiceal orifice is well established as a potential cause of appendicitis. However, it remains debated as to if appendiceal orifice obstruction secondary to Enterobius vermicularis is considered a risk factor for appendicitis or appendiceal colic. Enterobius vermicularis maintains an increased prevalence within lower socioeconomic and human development index regions. Whilst Australia has an overall high human development index it has significant variability in health literacy and socioeconomics. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the relationship between Enterobius vermicularis and appendicitis, to review the prevalence of Enterobius vermicularis appendicectomies in lower human development index and socioeconomic status communities, and to review the Australian based Enterobius vermicularis literature available. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to review the prevalence of Enterobius vermicularis at time of appendicectomy. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were investigated for applicable studies published until December 2023. Enterobius vermicularis within the appendiceal lumen may cause irritation and lymphoid hyperplasia resulting in appendiceal colic with a similar clinical presentation to that of acute appendicitis. An increased association between Enterobius vermicularis, low human development index, and socioeconomic status is suggested. Public health interventions reduce Enterobius prevalence. A single Australian based study from 1994 was identified. Enterobius vermicularis infection is a neglected risk factor for appendiceal colic. A high index of suspicion for Enterobius vermicularis infection should be taken for clinically stable patients with normal inflammatory biochemistry and low human development index. Further research is required to assess if there is a disparity in Enterobius vermicularis in relation to human development index, socioeconomic status, and remoteness within Australian communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾切除术时的蚯蚓肠杆菌感染:这是一个被忽视的风险因素吗?
阑尾孔阻塞是阑尾炎的潜在病因之一,这一点已得到公认。然而,对于因蚯蚓肠引起的阑尾孔阻塞是否被视为阑尾炎或阑尾绞痛的危险因素,目前仍存在争议。在社会经济和人类发展指数较低的地区,蠕形肠弧菌的发病率一直在上升。虽然澳大利亚的人类发展指数总体较高,但在健康素养和社会经济方面却存在很大差异。本文献综述的目的是评估肠道蠕虫与阑尾炎之间的关系,回顾肠道蠕虫阑尾切除术在人类发展指数和社会经济地位较低社区的流行情况,并回顾澳大利亚现有的肠道蠕虫文献。为了解阑尾切除术时蚯蚓肠杆菌的流行情况,我们对相关文献进行了全面回顾。调查了 PubMed、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中 2023 年 12 月之前发表的相关研究。阑尾腔内的蚯蚓肠杆菌可能会引起刺激和淋巴细胞增生,导致阑尾绞痛,其临床表现与急性阑尾炎相似。有研究表明,蚯蚓肠杆菌、人类发展指数低和社会经济地位之间的关系越来越密切。公共卫生干预措施降低了肠虫流行率。1994 年,澳大利亚进行了一项研究。蠕虫感染是阑尾绞痛的一个被忽视的危险因素。对于临床病情稳定、炎症生化指标正常且人类发育指数较低的患者,应高度怀疑是否感染了蠕形肠蛲虫。需要进一步开展研究,以评估澳大利亚社区内的蚯蚓肠炎是否与人类发育指数、社会经济地位和偏远程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congenital hepatic hemangioma: a review Pelvic congestion syndrome and its treatment: topic review Giant pancreatic cyst with extension to spleen managed by laparoscopy Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, a rare mimic and important differential of iliopsoas abscess Cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter extrusion through the mouth in a child: a case report with brief literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1