Low- and Middle-Income Country Perceptions of Global Health Engagements: A Scoping Review

Erick Amick, Farzana Sharmin, Sherri Bucher, Beverly W. Henry
{"title":"Low- and Middle-Income Country Perceptions of Global Health Engagements: A Scoping Review","authors":"Erick Amick, Farzana Sharmin, Sherri Bucher, Beverly W. Henry","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v16n3p35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than one million Americans are estimated to participate in global health engagements (GHEs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) each year. A growing number of studies document perceptions of GHEs from the perspective of American and other high-income country (HIC) visitors traveling to LMICs, particularly regarding motivations and satisfaction relative to their participation in these activities. Far fewer studies examine perceptions of GHEs from the perspective of LMIC hosts and other local constituent groups. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze studies that examined local stakeholder perspectives of global health engagements in LMICs around the world. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed and Google Scholar using the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. Assessment and analysis of articles was conducted by a team of three reviewers (EA, FS, SB). A total of 31 relevant papers published between 2009 and 2021 provided local perspectives of GHEs, with participants falling into three stakeholder categories: providers of care, recipients of care, and community members. Analysis revealed that stakeholder groups often held complex and highly nuanced perspectives of GHEs, perceiving these activities as having both positive and negative implications in the host communities. Synthesis of the eligible studies’ findings resulted in three thematic categories: resources and perceived benefits derived from GHEs; perceived challenges associated with GHEs; and opportunities for improvement of GHEs. To our knowledge, this scoping review is among the first to identify and collectively analyze LMIC stakeholder perceptions of GHEs. Recommendations for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":101408,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of health science","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of health science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v16n3p35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than one million Americans are estimated to participate in global health engagements (GHEs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) each year. A growing number of studies document perceptions of GHEs from the perspective of American and other high-income country (HIC) visitors traveling to LMICs, particularly regarding motivations and satisfaction relative to their participation in these activities. Far fewer studies examine perceptions of GHEs from the perspective of LMIC hosts and other local constituent groups. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze studies that examined local stakeholder perspectives of global health engagements in LMICs around the world. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed and Google Scholar using the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework. Assessment and analysis of articles was conducted by a team of three reviewers (EA, FS, SB). A total of 31 relevant papers published between 2009 and 2021 provided local perspectives of GHEs, with participants falling into three stakeholder categories: providers of care, recipients of care, and community members. Analysis revealed that stakeholder groups often held complex and highly nuanced perspectives of GHEs, perceiving these activities as having both positive and negative implications in the host communities. Synthesis of the eligible studies’ findings resulted in three thematic categories: resources and perceived benefits derived from GHEs; perceived challenges associated with GHEs; and opportunities for improvement of GHEs. To our knowledge, this scoping review is among the first to identify and collectively analyze LMIC stakeholder perceptions of GHEs. Recommendations for future research are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中低收入国家对全球卫生参与的看法:范围审查
据估计,每年有超过一百万美国人参与中低收入国家(LMICs)的全球健康活动(GHEs)。越来越多的研究记录了前往中低收入国家(LMIC)的美国和其他高收入国家(HIC)游客对全球卫生参与的看法,特别是他们参与这些活动的动机和满意度。从低收入国家东道主和其他当地组成群体的角度研究对全球健康教育的看法的研究要少得多。本研究的目的是识别和分析那些考察当地利益相关者对全球健康活动的看法的研究。我们采用人口-概念-背景 (PCC) 框架,对 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 进行了范围审查。由三名审稿人(EA、FS、SB)组成的团队对文章进行了评估和分析。2009 年至 2021 年间共发表了 31 篇相关论文,这些论文提供了有关全球健康教育的本地观点,参与者分为三个利益相关者类别:护理提供者、护理接受者和社区成员。分析表明,利益相关者群体通常对普通保健和教育持有复杂和高度微妙的观点,认为这些活动对所在社区既有积极影响,也有消极影响。对符合条件的研究结果进行综合后,形成了三个主题类别:从普通保健教育中获得的资源和感知到的益处;感知到的与普通保健教育相关的挑战;以及改进普通保健教育的机会。据我们所知,本次范围界定综述是首次确定并集体分析低收入与中等收入国家利益相关者对全球健康教育的看法。本文还为今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements for Global Journal of Health Science, Vol. 16, No. 4 Prevalence of Diabetes and the Relationship Between Wealth and Social Demographic Characteristics Across 6 Low-and-Middle Income Countries Singing Habit Potentially Prevents the Oral Frailty of Japanese Healthy Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Children among Adults attending Selected Health Facilities in Kinondoni Municipality; Dar es salaam, Tanzania: A Cross Sectional Study Profiles of Community Care Sites and provider Community Health Workers: A Case study at Gombe Matadi, Kenge and Kisantu Rural Health Zones in the Democratic Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1