An analysis of multiple comparisons is conducted to account for correlations among various investigated variables across four categories of antipsychotics

Maher A J. Alasasleh, Raafat Hani Aburumman, Arafat Khalaf Alzoubi, Hala Abdel Hamid Al Najada, Mohammad Wa'el Hindeyeh
{"title":"An analysis of multiple comparisons is conducted to account for correlations among various investigated variables across four categories of antipsychotics","authors":"Maher A J. Alasasleh, Raafat Hani Aburumman, Arafat Khalaf Alzoubi, Hala Abdel Hamid Al Najada, Mohammad Wa'el Hindeyeh","doi":"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: First-generation antipsychotics are dopamine receptor antagonists, while second-generation atypical antipsychotics are serotonin-dopamine antagonists. Aim: The study aims to compare the effectiveness of current anti-psychotic drugs in treating schizophrenia, focusing on their correlation with responsiveness rates in positive, negative, and psychopathological symptoms. Methods: The study focuses on schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in adults and elderly psychiatric patients at the Princess Aisha Bint Al Hussein Medical Centre. The study will assess the initial severity of patients and evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of four categorical-based oral and LA-APDs: older oral drugs, older oral and depot drugs, newer oral drugs, and newer oral and depot drugs. The reduction percentages in each component will be monitored, and a Chi Square test will be performed to analyze other variables. Pearson or spearman correlations will be used to explore correlation values. Results: Upon aggregating the various symptom categories into a unified score using the Positive and Negative Scoring Scale (PANSS), this study revealed that 63.7% of patients exhibited a positive response, whereas 36.7% of patients did not respond favourably. This equated to 110 out of 303 patients responding, compared to 193 patients who did not respond. The Pearson and Spearman correlations exhibited a statistically significant positive relationship, with values of +0.581±0.038 and +0.574±0.040, respectively (χ 2=131.885, p-value=0.000). Conclusion: Our study concluded that Psychopathological symptom therapy and patient adherence improved significantly. The efficiency of pleasant symptoms decreased significantly, whereas negative symptoms increased slightly.","PeriodicalId":23738,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First-generation antipsychotics are dopamine receptor antagonists, while second-generation atypical antipsychotics are serotonin-dopamine antagonists. Aim: The study aims to compare the effectiveness of current anti-psychotic drugs in treating schizophrenia, focusing on their correlation with responsiveness rates in positive, negative, and psychopathological symptoms. Methods: The study focuses on schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in adults and elderly psychiatric patients at the Princess Aisha Bint Al Hussein Medical Centre. The study will assess the initial severity of patients and evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of four categorical-based oral and LA-APDs: older oral drugs, older oral and depot drugs, newer oral drugs, and newer oral and depot drugs. The reduction percentages in each component will be monitored, and a Chi Square test will be performed to analyze other variables. Pearson or spearman correlations will be used to explore correlation values. Results: Upon aggregating the various symptom categories into a unified score using the Positive and Negative Scoring Scale (PANSS), this study revealed that 63.7% of patients exhibited a positive response, whereas 36.7% of patients did not respond favourably. This equated to 110 out of 303 patients responding, compared to 193 patients who did not respond. The Pearson and Spearman correlations exhibited a statistically significant positive relationship, with values of +0.581±0.038 and +0.574±0.040, respectively (χ 2=131.885, p-value=0.000). Conclusion: Our study concluded that Psychopathological symptom therapy and patient adherence improved significantly. The efficiency of pleasant symptoms decreased significantly, whereas negative symptoms increased slightly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进行了多重比较分析,以考虑四类抗精神病药物中各种调查变量之间的相关性
背景:第一代抗精神病药物是多巴胺受体拮抗剂,而第二代非典型抗精神病药物是血清素-多巴胺拮抗剂。目的:本研究旨在比较目前抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的疗效,重点关注这些药物与阳性、阴性和精神病理症状应答率的相关性。研究方法研究重点是艾莎-宾特-侯赛因公主医疗中心(Princess Aisha Bint Al Hussein Medical Centre)的成人和老年精神病患者的精神分裂症谱系障碍。该研究将评估患者最初的严重程度,并评估四种分类口服药物和 LA-APD 的治疗效果:较老的口服药物、较老的口服和去势药物、较新的口服药物以及较新的口服和去势药物。将监测各组成部分的减少百分比,并用Chi Square检验分析其他变量。将使用皮尔逊或矛曼相关性来探讨相关值。结果:在使用阳性和阴性评分量表(PANSS)将各种症状类别汇总为一个统一的分数后,本研究显示 63.7% 的患者表现出阳性反应,而 36.7% 的患者反应不佳。这相当于 303 名患者中有 110 名做出了反应,而 193 名患者没有做出反应。皮尔逊相关系数和斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为+0.581±0.038和+0.574±0.040(χ 2=131.885,P值=0.000),显示出显著的统计学正相关关系。结论我们的研究认为,精神病理症状治疗和患者依从性明显改善。愉快症状的效率明显降低,而消极症状则略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational strategies for drug discovery: Harnessing Indian medicinal plants A narrative review of pharmacological and phytochemical properties of decorative flowering plants at Hyde Park Zoo Sanctuary and Tropical Gardens Inc., Guyana Recent updates on the safety of neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic Development and characterization of Decitabine Niosomes Attachment style and relationship satisfaction among early adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1