Effects of interface model on performance of a vortex pump in CFD simulations

Wenguang Li
{"title":"Effects of interface model on performance of a vortex pump in CFD simulations","authors":"Wenguang Li","doi":"10.1063/5.0196213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That the predicted head of a vortex pump is higher than that measured experimentally is very common in simulations of turbulent flow in such pumps. To identify why, reported here is a study of the turbulent flow of water in a vortex pump with a specific speed of 76 and fluid domains with 1/8-impeller and whole-impeller geometrical models and smooth walls using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, the standard k–ɛ model, and a scalable wall function in ANSYS CFX 2019 R2. The results show that the aforementioned phenomenon is related to the choice of interface model. With the 1/8-impeller model, the head predicted by the frozen rotor model agrees with the experimental head. By contrast, the transient rotor model provides a reasonably accurate head against the experimental head but requires huge computing resources and overestimates the pump efficiency, and the stage model is unsuitable for predicting the head of the pump. The flow patterns in the vaneless chamber and impeller predicted with the 1/8-impeller model are more uniform because of artificial fluid mixing on the interface than those predicted with the whole-impeller model by using the frozen rotor model, and the flow patterns predicted with the whole-impeller model by using the transient rotor model are in between. The hydraulic performance of the pump is predicted with the 1/8-impeller model and frozen rotor model at various viscosities, and the flow-rate, head, and efficiency correction factors are determined and correlated with the impeller Reynolds number.","PeriodicalId":517827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fluid Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fluid Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0196213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

That the predicted head of a vortex pump is higher than that measured experimentally is very common in simulations of turbulent flow in such pumps. To identify why, reported here is a study of the turbulent flow of water in a vortex pump with a specific speed of 76 and fluid domains with 1/8-impeller and whole-impeller geometrical models and smooth walls using the 3D steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, the standard k–ɛ model, and a scalable wall function in ANSYS CFX 2019 R2. The results show that the aforementioned phenomenon is related to the choice of interface model. With the 1/8-impeller model, the head predicted by the frozen rotor model agrees with the experimental head. By contrast, the transient rotor model provides a reasonably accurate head against the experimental head but requires huge computing resources and overestimates the pump efficiency, and the stage model is unsuitable for predicting the head of the pump. The flow patterns in the vaneless chamber and impeller predicted with the 1/8-impeller model are more uniform because of artificial fluid mixing on the interface than those predicted with the whole-impeller model by using the frozen rotor model, and the flow patterns predicted with the whole-impeller model by using the transient rotor model are in between. The hydraulic performance of the pump is predicted with the 1/8-impeller model and frozen rotor model at various viscosities, and the flow-rate, head, and efficiency correction factors are determined and correlated with the impeller Reynolds number.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CFD 模拟中界面模型对旋涡泵性能的影响
旋涡泵的预测扬程高于实验测量值,这在此类泵的湍流模拟中非常常见。为了找出原因,本文报告了在 ANSYS CFX 2019 R2 中使用三维稳定雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯方程、标准 k-ɛ 模型和可扩展壁面函数对特定速度为 76、流体域为 1/8 叶轮和全叶轮几何模型以及光滑壁面的旋涡泵中水的湍流进行的研究。结果表明,上述现象与界面模型的选择有关。在 1/8 叶轮模型下,冻结转子模型预测的水头与实验水头一致。相比之下,瞬态转子模型能提供与实验扬程相当精确的扬程,但需要巨大的计算资源,并且高估了泵的效率,而级模型则不适合预测泵的扬程。由于界面上的人工流体混合,用 1/8 叶轮模型预测的无叶片腔和叶轮中的流型比用冻结转子模型预测的全叶轮模型更均匀,而用瞬态转子模型预测的全叶轮模型的流型介于两者之间。利用 1/8 叶轮模型和冻结转子模型预测了不同粘度下泵的水力性能,确定了流速、扬程和效率修正系数,并将其与叶轮雷诺数相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transport of nonspherical particles in non-Newtonian fluid: A review Experimental study of drag characteristics and dust removal performance of a hybrid wet-filter precipitator A coupled modeling framework for investigating flow maldistribution in cross-flow-corrugated plate heat exchangers Studies on the inhibitory effect of different surfactants on ammonium chloride corrosion Mechanism analysis of the vortex ring and its effects on an axial descending rotor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1