“It Makes Us Feel More Professional!” Stakeholders’ Perception of the Ghana Teacher Licensure Examination

Richardson Addai-Mununkum, Samuel Asare Amoah, E. Tamanja, Patricia Mawusi Amos, E. A. Agyeman, Christian Addai-Poku, Peter Akayuure, Hinneh Kusi
{"title":"“It Makes Us Feel More Professional!” Stakeholders’ Perception of the Ghana Teacher Licensure Examination","authors":"Richardson Addai-Mununkum, Samuel Asare Amoah, E. Tamanja, Patricia Mawusi Amos, E. A. Agyeman, Christian Addai-Poku, Peter Akayuure, Hinneh Kusi","doi":"10.11648/j.tecs.20240901.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The professionalism of teaching has been subject of an age long debate. Teachers beseech others to recognize them as professionals and they become belligerent when they fail to receive recognition. Since 2018, Ghana has instituted the Ghana Teacher Licensure Examinations (GTLE) to regulate entry into the teaching profession. This policy has received a mixed bag of reactions with the populace sharply divided in opinion. Given that knowledge gap existed, it was important to interrogate the general perception of all stakeholders across Ghana to unravel how the GTLE is perceived among stakeholders. This paper is culled out of a broader study that employed a mixed-methods research approach in a nationwide study involving over 2800 respondents. For this paper, we report on the qualitative data generated from 145 participants. We describe the concerns of stakeholders who are in favour, against, or ambivalent about the GTLE. Drawing on an adaptation of CBAM model, we discuss stakeholders’ perceptions of GTLE as stages of concern. We conclude that stakeholders opposed to the licensing of teachers do so because of their concerns about its form, content, and other logistical challenges. To sustain the policy, it is recommended for the National Teaching Council and the Ministry of Education to take steps to address these concerns. Regardless, what stakeholders agree to be the biggest strength of the GTLE is that it is a positive step towards professionalizing teaching. It is a useful yardstick to determine who is qualified to perform the function of teaching, and prevents all others who do not qualify from accessing classrooms.","PeriodicalId":417229,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20240901.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The professionalism of teaching has been subject of an age long debate. Teachers beseech others to recognize them as professionals and they become belligerent when they fail to receive recognition. Since 2018, Ghana has instituted the Ghana Teacher Licensure Examinations (GTLE) to regulate entry into the teaching profession. This policy has received a mixed bag of reactions with the populace sharply divided in opinion. Given that knowledge gap existed, it was important to interrogate the general perception of all stakeholders across Ghana to unravel how the GTLE is perceived among stakeholders. This paper is culled out of a broader study that employed a mixed-methods research approach in a nationwide study involving over 2800 respondents. For this paper, we report on the qualitative data generated from 145 participants. We describe the concerns of stakeholders who are in favour, against, or ambivalent about the GTLE. Drawing on an adaptation of CBAM model, we discuss stakeholders’ perceptions of GTLE as stages of concern. We conclude that stakeholders opposed to the licensing of teachers do so because of their concerns about its form, content, and other logistical challenges. To sustain the policy, it is recommended for the National Teaching Council and the Ministry of Education to take steps to address these concerns. Regardless, what stakeholders agree to be the biggest strength of the GTLE is that it is a positive step towards professionalizing teaching. It is a useful yardstick to determine who is qualified to perform the function of teaching, and prevents all others who do not qualify from accessing classrooms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"它让我们感觉更专业!"利益相关者对加纳教师资格考试的看法
教学的专业性一直是一个争论不休的问题。教师们恳求他人承认他们是专业人士,而当他们得不到承认时,他们就会变得好战。自 2018 年起,加纳开始实施加纳教师资格考试(GTLE),以规范教师职业的准入。对于这项政策,民众反响不一,意见分歧很大。鉴于存在知识差距,有必要调查加纳所有利益相关者的普遍看法,以了解利益相关者对 GTLE 的看法。本文摘自一项更广泛的研究,该研究采用了混合研究方法,在全国范围内进行调查,涉及 2800 多名受访者。在本文中,我们报告了从 145 名参与者那里获得的定性数据。我们描述了赞成、反对或对 GTLE 持矛盾态度的利益相关者所关注的问题。借鉴 CBAM 模型的改编,我们将利益相关者对 GTLE 的看法划分为不同的关注阶段。我们得出结论,反对教师资格证制度的利益相关者之所以反对,是因为他们对其形式、内容和其他后勤方面的挑战感到担忧。为了维持这项政策,建议国家教学委员会和教育部采取措施解决这些问题。无论如何,利益相关者都认为 GTLE 的最大优势在于它是实现教学专业化的积极步骤。它是确定谁有资格履行教学职能的有用尺度,并防止所有其他不合格的人进入课堂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geometric Thinking of Prospective Mathematics Teachers: Assessing the Foundation Built by University Undergraduate Education in Ghana Obstacles Facing Sport Education Teacher During Service in the Gaza Strip Governorates Relevancy of Modern Agriculture Education on Students’ Farming Practical Skills in Secondary Schools of Kabujogera Town Council, Kitagwenda District “It Makes Us Feel More Professional!” Stakeholders’ Perception of the Ghana Teacher Licensure Examination Teaching-Learning Grammar via Cooperative Language Learning: Kombolcha Secondary School in Focus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1