Assessment of knowledge, attitude, perception towards pharmacy practice regulations 2015 among community pharmacists in Mangalore

Christy T Chacko, Nandana Krishnan, Sahala Nafeesath Missriya, Mukhthar Ali T, Jishnu OK, Shabaraya AR
{"title":"Assessment of knowledge, attitude, perception towards pharmacy practice regulations 2015 among community pharmacists in Mangalore","authors":"Christy T Chacko, Nandana Krishnan, Sahala Nafeesath Missriya, Mukhthar Ali T, Jishnu OK, Shabaraya AR","doi":"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pharmacy Practice Regulations of 2015 were formulated to standardize and enhance pharmacy practices in India. Community pharmacy professionals globally are taking on expanded roles in patient care and health promotion. However, some lack awareness of recommended pharmaceutical care services in new regulations. This knowledge gap poses risks of medication errors and serious consequences, even patient fatalities. To address this, it's crucial to provide ongoing education, enhance communication, integrate technology, ensure regulatory compliance, and establish effective feedback mechanisms within pharmacies. These measures aim to improve knowledge, compliance, and, ultimately, patient safety. This study, conducted in Mangalore over a period of approximately 2.5 months, is a community-based cross-sectional study with a sample size of 100 participants. It included community pharmacists working in Mangalore. Knowledge of community pharmacists were analysed and it was found that out of 100 participants only 18% were aware, 60% were not aware and 22% were not sure about the PPR,2015. In this study, 42% of participants were not aware of the duties outlined in PPR,2015. Among the surveyed pharmacists, 55% believed that adhering to Pharmacy Practice Regulations was essential for improving patient healthcare. In contrast, 20% held the opinion that following these regulations was unnecessary, while 28% expressed uncertainty on the matter. Mandating minimum education level for working in community pharmacies should be implemented. Practicing pharmacists should be encouraged to update their knowledge by attending continuous education programmes. The morals and responsibilities of community pharmacists should be continuously reminded to the pharmacists.","PeriodicalId":23738,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Pharmacy Practice Regulations of 2015 were formulated to standardize and enhance pharmacy practices in India. Community pharmacy professionals globally are taking on expanded roles in patient care and health promotion. However, some lack awareness of recommended pharmaceutical care services in new regulations. This knowledge gap poses risks of medication errors and serious consequences, even patient fatalities. To address this, it's crucial to provide ongoing education, enhance communication, integrate technology, ensure regulatory compliance, and establish effective feedback mechanisms within pharmacies. These measures aim to improve knowledge, compliance, and, ultimately, patient safety. This study, conducted in Mangalore over a period of approximately 2.5 months, is a community-based cross-sectional study with a sample size of 100 participants. It included community pharmacists working in Mangalore. Knowledge of community pharmacists were analysed and it was found that out of 100 participants only 18% were aware, 60% were not aware and 22% were not sure about the PPR,2015. In this study, 42% of participants were not aware of the duties outlined in PPR,2015. Among the surveyed pharmacists, 55% believed that adhering to Pharmacy Practice Regulations was essential for improving patient healthcare. In contrast, 20% held the opinion that following these regulations was unnecessary, while 28% expressed uncertainty on the matter. Mandating minimum education level for working in community pharmacies should be implemented. Practicing pharmacists should be encouraged to update their knowledge by attending continuous education programmes. The morals and responsibilities of community pharmacists should be continuously reminded to the pharmacists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芒格洛尔社区药剂师对《2015 年药学实践条例》的知识、态度和看法评估
2015 年药学实践条例》的制定旨在规范和加强印度的药学实践。全球社区药学专业人员在患者护理和健康促进方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,一些人对新法规中推荐的药物护理服务缺乏认识。这种知识差距带来了用药错误的风险和严重后果,甚至造成患者死亡。要解决这一问题,关键在于提供持续教育、加强沟通、整合技术、确保法规合规,并在药房内建立有效的反馈机制。这些措施旨在提高知识水平和合规性,最终确保患者安全。这项研究在芒格洛尔进行,历时约 2.5 个月,是一项基于社区的横断面研究,样本量为 100 人。研究对象包括在芒格洛尔工作的社区药剂师。对社区药剂师的知识进行分析后发现,在 100 名参与者中,只有 18% 的人了解《2015 年公共采购政策》,60% 的人不了解,22% 的人不确定。在这项研究中,42% 的参与者不了解《2015 年药剂师公共政策》中概述的职责。在接受调查的药剂师中,55% 认为遵守《药房工作规范》对改善患者医疗保健至关重要。相比之下,20% 的人认为没有必要遵守这些法规,28% 的人对此表示不确定。应规定社区药房从业人员的最低教育水平。應鼓勵執業藥劑師參加持續進修課程,以更新知識。應不斷提醒藥劑師有關社區藥劑師的道德和責任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational strategies for drug discovery: Harnessing Indian medicinal plants A narrative review of pharmacological and phytochemical properties of decorative flowering plants at Hyde Park Zoo Sanctuary and Tropical Gardens Inc., Guyana Recent updates on the safety of neurosurgery during the COVID-19 pandemic Development and characterization of Decitabine Niosomes Attachment style and relationship satisfaction among early adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1