Incidence of Extravasation during Norepinephrine Administration via Peripheral Venous Catheter in Emergency Patients

Diana Karimee, Montira Buakhong, Ploylarp Lertvipapath, Chok Limsuwat
{"title":"Incidence of Extravasation during Norepinephrine Administration via Peripheral Venous Catheter in Emergency Patients","authors":"Diana Karimee, Montira Buakhong, Ploylarp Lertvipapath, Chok Limsuwat","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the incidence of extravasation resulting from the administration of norepinephrine through a peripheral venous catheter in emergency patients.Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 150 adult patients in the emergency department at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Physicians closely monitored patients who received norepinephrine via a peripheral venous catheter examining the intravenous access sites during the period of treatment and for up to 48 hours after discontinuation of treatment. We collected demographic data, norepinephrine administration details, potential risk factors for extravasation, the incidence of extravasation, and mortality rate.Results: The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 60.7% were male. Most patients (93.3%) received peripheral intravenous norepinephrine for septic shock, administered below the wrist joint (47.3%) through a 22-gauge catheter (82.7%). The median duration of total peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration was 19.92 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 9.48-38.09). The median maximum dose was 0.07 mcg/kg/min (IQR 0.04-0.10). Extravasation occurred in three patients (2.0%) (95% CI: 0.6 - 6.1), none of which resulted in significant morbidity. The timing from shock diagnosis to peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration did not statistically differ between survivors and non-survivors at both 7 and 30 days. However, the median time from shock diagnosis to achieve mean arterial pressure (MAP)≥65 mmHg, and time from norepinephrine administration to achieve MAP ≥65 mmHg, was shorter in the survivors compared to the non-survivors.Conclusion: Given that the incidence of extravasation events was low and did not result in significant morbidity, we suggest that peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration is safe under close observation and for a limited duration.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the incidence of extravasation resulting from the administration of norepinephrine through a peripheral venous catheter in emergency patients.Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 150 adult patients in the emergency department at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Physicians closely monitored patients who received norepinephrine via a peripheral venous catheter examining the intravenous access sites during the period of treatment and for up to 48 hours after discontinuation of treatment. We collected demographic data, norepinephrine administration details, potential risk factors for extravasation, the incidence of extravasation, and mortality rate.Results: The median age of the patients was 67 years, and 60.7% were male. Most patients (93.3%) received peripheral intravenous norepinephrine for septic shock, administered below the wrist joint (47.3%) through a 22-gauge catheter (82.7%). The median duration of total peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration was 19.92 hours (interquartile range (IQR) 9.48-38.09). The median maximum dose was 0.07 mcg/kg/min (IQR 0.04-0.10). Extravasation occurred in three patients (2.0%) (95% CI: 0.6 - 6.1), none of which resulted in significant morbidity. The timing from shock diagnosis to peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration did not statistically differ between survivors and non-survivors at both 7 and 30 days. However, the median time from shock diagnosis to achieve mean arterial pressure (MAP)≥65 mmHg, and time from norepinephrine administration to achieve MAP ≥65 mmHg, was shorter in the survivors compared to the non-survivors.Conclusion: Given that the incidence of extravasation events was low and did not result in significant morbidity, we suggest that peripheral intravenous norepinephrine administration is safe under close observation and for a limited duration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊病人经外周静脉导管注射去甲肾上腺素时的外渗发生率
目的:描述急诊病人通过外周静脉导管注射去甲肾上腺素导致外渗的发生率:描述急诊病人通过外周静脉导管注射去甲肾上腺素导致外渗的发生率:这项前瞻性观察研究的对象是泰国 Siriraj 医院急诊科的 150 名成年患者。医生对通过外周静脉导管接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的患者进行了密切监测,在治疗期间和治疗停止后的 48 小时内检查了静脉通路部位。我们收集了人口统计学数据、去甲肾上腺素给药详情、外渗的潜在风险因素、外渗发生率和死亡率:患者的中位年龄为 67 岁,60.7% 为男性。大多数患者(93.3%)接受脓毒性休克外周静脉注射去甲肾上腺素,通过 22 号导管在腕关节下方给药(47.3%)(82.7%)。外周静脉注射去甲肾上腺素的总时间中位数为 19.92 小时(四分位距(IQR)为 9.48-38.09)。中位最大剂量为 0.07 微克/千克/分钟(IQR 0.04-0.10)。三名患者(2.0%)(95% CI:0.6 - 6.1)发生了外渗,但均未导致重大发病。在 7 天和 30 天内,从休克诊断到外周静脉注射去甲肾上腺素的时间在幸存者和非幸存者之间没有统计学差异。然而,与非幸存者相比,幸存者从诊断休克到达到平均动脉压(MAP)≥65 mmHg 的中位时间以及从注射去甲肾上腺素到达到平均动脉压≥65 mmHg 的时间较短:鉴于外渗事件的发生率较低且未导致严重的发病率,我们认为在密切观察和有限的持续时间内,外周静脉注射去甲肾上腺素是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1