Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Kanlayanee No-in, Adul Wuttijurepan, Saowapa Dedkhard, Saifon Insrichuen, Sripare Khemwichai
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Kanlayanee No-in, Adul Wuttijurepan, Saowapa Dedkhard, Saifon Insrichuen, Sripare Khemwichai","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a patient-family-shared care program in delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease (PFS-DCKD-P) in uncontrolled type 2 diabetic patients within Phrae province, Thailand.Material and Methods: In this quasi-experimental research, twenty-three patient-family member dyads in the intervention group completed the 16-week PFS-DCKD-P; while twenty-two patient-family member dyads of the control group received a regular program. Outcomes included: patients’ shared care, family members’ shared care and the clinical outcomes, which were chronic kidney disease clinical indexes (CKDC-Indexes). Differences were compared within the groups before and after participating in the program as well as differences between groups after participating in the program. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and independent t-test statistics were used for data analysis.Results: The patients’ shared care of a decision-making component and a reciprocity component, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and blood sugar (BS) after program participation were higher than before in the intervention group (p-value<0.05). When compared between groups, the SBP of the intervention group was lower than the control group (p-value<0.05). There were no statistical differences of patients’ and family members’ shared care mean scores between the two groups. However, family members’ shared care of the communication component was increased in the intervention group (p-value<0.05). Conclusion: The PFS-DCKD-P showed no explicit effectiveness on improving shared care for both patients and family members, nor for CKDC-Indexes. Further studies should optimize each program activity and encourage more consistent participation from family members.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":"29 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a patient-family-shared care program in delaying the progression of chronic kidney disease (PFS-DCKD-P) in uncontrolled type 2 diabetic patients within Phrae province, Thailand.Material and Methods: In this quasi-experimental research, twenty-three patient-family member dyads in the intervention group completed the 16-week PFS-DCKD-P; while twenty-two patient-family member dyads of the control group received a regular program. Outcomes included: patients’ shared care, family members’ shared care and the clinical outcomes, which were chronic kidney disease clinical indexes (CKDC-Indexes). Differences were compared within the groups before and after participating in the program as well as differences between groups after participating in the program. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and independent t-test statistics were used for data analysis.Results: The patients’ shared care of a decision-making component and a reciprocity component, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and blood sugar (BS) after program participation were higher than before in the intervention group (p-value<0.05). When compared between groups, the SBP of the intervention group was lower than the control group (p-value<0.05). There were no statistical differences of patients’ and family members’ shared care mean scores between the two groups. However, family members’ shared care of the communication component was increased in the intervention group (p-value<0.05). Conclusion: The PFS-DCKD-P showed no explicit effectiveness on improving shared care for both patients and family members, nor for CKDC-Indexes. Further studies should optimize each program activity and encourage more consistent participation from family members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者-家属共同护理计划对延缓未受控制的 2 型糖尿病患者慢性肾病进展的效果:一项准实验研究
研究目的本研究旨在探讨患者-家庭共享护理计划(PFS-DCKD-P)对泰国帕府未受控制的 2 型糖尿病患者延缓慢性肾病进展的效果:在这项准实验研究中,干预组的 23 名患者-家属二人组完成了为期 16 周的 PFS-DCKD-P 项目;对照组的 22 名患者-家属二人组接受了常规项目。研究结果包括:患者共同护理、家庭成员共同护理和临床结果,即慢性肾脏病临床指数(CKDC-Indexes)。比较了各组在参加计划前后的差异,以及参加计划后各组之间的差异。数据分析采用了描述性统计、配对 t 检验和独立 t 检验:结果:干预组患者参与计划后的共同护理(决策部分和互惠部分)、收缩压(SBP)和血糖(BS)均高于干预前(P值<0.05)。组间比较,干预组的收缩压低于对照组(P 值<0.05)。两组患者和家属的共同护理平均得分无统计学差异。然而,干预组患者家属在沟通部分的共同护理得分有所增加(P 值<0.05)。结论PFS-DCKD-P对改善患者和家属的共同护理以及CKDC-Indexes均无明显效果。进一步的研究应优化每项计划活动,鼓励家庭成员更持续地参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1