Assessment of meat preservation methods used by retailers and the estimation of direct economic losses associated with meat spoilage in Kenya

Nadia James Killa, Ombui Jackson Nyarongi, Gathura Peter Baaro
{"title":"Assessment of meat preservation methods used by retailers and the estimation of direct economic losses associated with meat spoilage in Kenya","authors":"Nadia James Killa, Ombui Jackson Nyarongi, Gathura Peter Baaro","doi":"10.18502/jfsh.v9i4.14999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meat spoilage reduces the meat quality and the revenue from the meat industry. This study assessed the direct impact of ineffective meat preservation methods on economic loss among meat retailers in the Dagoretti region of Nairobi, Kenya. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 87 butcheries and 9 supermarkets from low, middle, and high-income areas using a systematic sampling technique. The meat losses were measured by kilograms of spoilt meat and associated financial cost was estimated. Descriptive and Inferential statistics were used to establish the significance of the association between preservation and demographic factors. A correlation analysis was used to estimate the strength of the relationship between the factors. The study revealed that most of meat handlers heavily relied on refrigeration methods (73%) for storing meat, and 27% hung meat at room temperature due to the high cost of electricity and deep freezers. Furthermore, it revealed that each meat retail business lost 2.3 kg (1.0-3.0 kg) on average per week, which indicates financial losses of USD 11.5 (Range 5.0-15.0 USD) per week or USD 598 (Range USD 260-790) per year. These losses were mainly associated with moisture loss (49%) and microbial spoilage (22%). Poor storage and meat handling practices were blamed for spoilt meat. Meat retailers reported fly menace disturbing their business. It’s recommended that the government implement policies to reduce electricity bills and enhance the adoption of refrigeration methods, while industry stakeholders should facilitate initiatives for public awareness on appropriate methods of meat preservation. Additionally, retail cut meat products on display should be wrapped with permeable film to reduce moisture loss. Further study is needed for a comprehensive analysis of direct economic losses segregated by meat types and preservation forms.","PeriodicalId":91000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i4.14999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meat spoilage reduces the meat quality and the revenue from the meat industry. This study assessed the direct impact of ineffective meat preservation methods on economic loss among meat retailers in the Dagoretti region of Nairobi, Kenya. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 87 butcheries and 9 supermarkets from low, middle, and high-income areas using a systematic sampling technique. The meat losses were measured by kilograms of spoilt meat and associated financial cost was estimated. Descriptive and Inferential statistics were used to establish the significance of the association between preservation and demographic factors. A correlation analysis was used to estimate the strength of the relationship between the factors. The study revealed that most of meat handlers heavily relied on refrigeration methods (73%) for storing meat, and 27% hung meat at room temperature due to the high cost of electricity and deep freezers. Furthermore, it revealed that each meat retail business lost 2.3 kg (1.0-3.0 kg) on average per week, which indicates financial losses of USD 11.5 (Range 5.0-15.0 USD) per week or USD 598 (Range USD 260-790) per year. These losses were mainly associated with moisture loss (49%) and microbial spoilage (22%). Poor storage and meat handling practices were blamed for spoilt meat. Meat retailers reported fly menace disturbing their business. It’s recommended that the government implement policies to reduce electricity bills and enhance the adoption of refrigeration methods, while industry stakeholders should facilitate initiatives for public awareness on appropriate methods of meat preservation. Additionally, retail cut meat products on display should be wrapped with permeable film to reduce moisture loss. Further study is needed for a comprehensive analysis of direct economic losses segregated by meat types and preservation forms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚零售商使用的肉类保存方法评估以及与肉类腐败相关的直接经济损失估算
肉类腐败会降低肉类质量,减少肉类行业的收入。本研究评估了肯尼亚内罗毕达戈雷蒂地区肉类保存方法无效对肉类零售商经济损失的直接影响。采用系统抽样技术,对来自低收入、中等收入和高收入地区的 87 家肉店和 9 家超市进行了横向调查。肉类损失按变质肉的公斤数计算,并估算了相关的经济成本。使用描述性和推论性统计来确定保存与人口统计因素之间的相关性。相关分析用于估算各因素之间的关系强度。研究结果显示,大多数肉类经营者(73%)严重依赖冷藏方法储存肉类,27%的肉类经营者由于电费和深冷冻箱费用高昂而在室温下晾晒肉类。此外,调查还显示,每家肉类零售企业平均每周损失 2.3 公斤(1.0-3.0 公斤),这表明每周的经济损失为 11.5 美元(5.0-15.0 美元不等),或每年 598 美元(260-790 美元不等)。这些损失主要与水分流失(49%)和微生物腐败(22%)有关。储藏和肉类处理不当是造成肉类变质的原因。肉类零售商报告说,苍蝇的威胁干扰了他们的生意。建议政府实施降低电费的政策,并加强冷藏方法的采用,而行业利益相关者则应促进提高公众对适当肉类保存方法的认识。此外,零售店陈列的切肉产品应使用透气薄膜包裹,以减少水分流失。要全面分析按肉类种类和保存方式分类的直接经济损失,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the antioxidant activity and the level of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey Assessment of aflatoxin levels in whole and peeled ginger marketed in Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania Bacteriological quality of street-vended beverages sold in two popular markets in Georgetown, Guyana Assessment of meat preservation methods used by retailers and the estimation of direct economic losses associated with meat spoilage in Kenya Nitrosamine in meat and meat products: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1