Adopting immersive technologies in construction training: determining educational decision-making criteria through a Delphi technique

IF 3.5 Q3 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Smart and Sustainable Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0202
Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli, Jian Tsen Goh, A. Rashidi, Duncan Maxwell, Ross Digby, Yihai Fang, Henry Pook, Mehrdad Arashpour
{"title":"Adopting immersive technologies in construction training: determining educational decision-making criteria through a Delphi technique","authors":"Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli, Jian Tsen Goh, A. Rashidi, Duncan Maxwell, Ross Digby, Yihai Fang, Henry Pook, Mehrdad Arashpour","doi":"10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn the realm of construction education, the investigation of immersive learning and extended reality (XR) technologies has experienced a surge in recent times. Nevertheless, there remains a notable lack of comprehension surrounding the most efficient ways to integrate these technologies into tailored teaching approaches for vocational construction training. This research study aims to pinpoint the key factors that construction vocational education and training (VET) providers must consider when introducing XR technologies into their training schemes.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted an in-depth literature review to develop an initial framework to summarise training, technology and institutional factors influencing the educational-technology integration of XR technologies in VET. In addition, this study utilised a Delphi technique, including semi-structured group discussions and two rounds of online follow-up questionnaires, to capture VET experts’ judgements on the importance of decision-making criteria.FindingsThis study has identified the critical factors to be considered in the VET sector when adopting XR technologies. Findings revealed institutional factors were the most important criteria for participants, followed by training and technology factors.Research limitations/implicationsThe current decision-making process focuses on selecting XR technologies rather than evaluating their performance after implementation. Therefore, more research is needed to monitor the implementation of this technology in curricula from a senior management perspective. This will help to understand the cost and value factors related to the value proposition of XR technologies in courses.Practical implicationsTo ensure the success and long-term viability of the technology-curriculum interface, it is important to consider factors such as the availability of technical and educational support, data security and cost-effectiveness. It is also crucial to focus on ease of use and content development that emphasises instruction to create engaging content for learners.Originality/valueThe potential impact of this study is underpinned by two facts: (1) it constitutes the first effort made in the field to comprehensively elicit VET expert judgements in relation to XR technologies, and (2) it offers decision-making criteria that are at play in seeking to take advantage of high-cost technologies that are rapidly evolving. While there is no simple checklist for XR implementation, this study takes a step further to identify significant factors influencing XR integration in vocational construction training.","PeriodicalId":45779,"journal":{"name":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart and Sustainable Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-08-2023-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn the realm of construction education, the investigation of immersive learning and extended reality (XR) technologies has experienced a surge in recent times. Nevertheless, there remains a notable lack of comprehension surrounding the most efficient ways to integrate these technologies into tailored teaching approaches for vocational construction training. This research study aims to pinpoint the key factors that construction vocational education and training (VET) providers must consider when introducing XR technologies into their training schemes.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted an in-depth literature review to develop an initial framework to summarise training, technology and institutional factors influencing the educational-technology integration of XR technologies in VET. In addition, this study utilised a Delphi technique, including semi-structured group discussions and two rounds of online follow-up questionnaires, to capture VET experts’ judgements on the importance of decision-making criteria.FindingsThis study has identified the critical factors to be considered in the VET sector when adopting XR technologies. Findings revealed institutional factors were the most important criteria for participants, followed by training and technology factors.Research limitations/implicationsThe current decision-making process focuses on selecting XR technologies rather than evaluating their performance after implementation. Therefore, more research is needed to monitor the implementation of this technology in curricula from a senior management perspective. This will help to understand the cost and value factors related to the value proposition of XR technologies in courses.Practical implicationsTo ensure the success and long-term viability of the technology-curriculum interface, it is important to consider factors such as the availability of technical and educational support, data security and cost-effectiveness. It is also crucial to focus on ease of use and content development that emphasises instruction to create engaging content for learners.Originality/valueThe potential impact of this study is underpinned by two facts: (1) it constitutes the first effort made in the field to comprehensively elicit VET expert judgements in relation to XR technologies, and (2) it offers decision-making criteria that are at play in seeking to take advantage of high-cost technologies that are rapidly evolving. While there is no simple checklist for XR implementation, this study takes a step further to identify significant factors influencing XR integration in vocational construction training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在建筑培训中采用沉浸式技术:通过德尔菲技术确定教育决策标准
目的 在建筑教育领域,对沉浸式学习和扩展现实(XR)技术的研究近来急剧增加。然而,对于如何最有效地将这些技术整合到建筑职业培训的定制教学方法中,人们仍明显缺乏了解。本研究旨在明确建筑职业教育与培训(VET)机构在将 XR 技术引入其培训计划时必须考虑的关键因素。本研究进行了深入的文献综述,以制定一个初步框架,总结影响职业教育与培训中 XR 技术教育与技术整合的培训、技术和机构因素。此外,本研究还采用了德尔菲技术,包括半结构化小组讨论和两轮在线跟踪问卷调查,以了解职业教育与培训专家对决策标准重要性的判断。 研究结果本研究确定了职业教育与培训部门在采用 XR 技术时需要考虑的关键因素。研究局限/影响目前的决策过程侧重于选择 XR 技术,而不是在实施后评估其性能。因此,需要开展更多的研究,从高级管理层的角度监测该技术在课程中的实施情况。实际意义为确保技术-课程接口的成功和长期可行性,必须考虑技术和教育支持的可用性、数据安全性和成本效益等因素。原创性/价值本研究的潜在影响基于两个事实:(1)这是该领域首次全面征求职业教育与培训专家对 XR 技术的判断;(2)它提供了在寻求利用快速发展的高成本技术时的决策标准。虽然 XR 实施没有简单的清单,但本研究进一步确定了影响 XR 融入职业建筑培训的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Towards promoting circular building adaptability in adaptive reuse projects: a co-developed framework Sources of occupational stress in UK construction projects: an empirical investigation and agenda for future research Nudge or mandate: an exploration into the constraints of volumetric modular construction in Australia Structural determinants of the uptake of cyber-physical systems for facilities management – a confirmatory factor analysis approach Public toilets for accessible and inclusive cities: disability, design and maintenance from the perspective of wheelchair users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1