Neurosonograms in very preterm neonates: Findings, risk factors, and association with neurodevelopmental outcome: A retrospective study

Shyam Kumar Sasidhara Kurup, Femitha Pournami, A. Prithvi, A. Kolisambeevi, A. Panackal, Jyothi Prabhakar, Naveen Jain
{"title":"Neurosonograms in very preterm neonates: Findings, risk factors, and association with neurodevelopmental outcome: A retrospective study","authors":"Shyam Kumar Sasidhara Kurup, Femitha Pournami, A. Prithvi, A. Kolisambeevi, A. Panackal, Jyothi Prabhakar, Naveen Jain","doi":"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_98_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Neurosonogram (NSG) is a widely used, noninvasive bedside investigation in neonatal intensive care. Yet, actual data on the proportions of abnormal findings, specific conclusions, and its ability to predict outcomes are sparse. We aimed to study these aspects in very preterm infants who are a high-risk group.\n \n \n \n This retrospective descriptive study aimed at analyzing reports of postnatal age-specific NSG reports done in very preterm neonates, and their associations with risk factors. Follow-up information prospectively recorded by the child development services was analyzed for the association of NSG abnormalities with neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI).\n \n \n \n Clinical and radiological details of 323 very preterm neonates were analyzed. Abnormal NSG (defined as ≥Grade 3 intraventricular hemorrhage/≥Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia/ventriculomegaly) was reported in 42 infants (13%) at or less than term postmenstrual age; 8% of babies at ≤2 weeks postnatal age; and 12% at 36–40 weeks. Choroid plexus cyst was the most common “other” findings. Gestational age <28 weeks, chorioamnionitis, extensive resuscitation, ventilation >24 h, and culture-proven sepsis were independent risk factors for abnormal NSG in the first 2 weeks of life. Of the babies followed up, 19.25% babies had NDI. The sensitivity of any abnormal NSG was only 16% and the specificity was 91% to predict NDI. The negative predictive value of abnormal NSG for NDI was 79.5%.\n \n \n \n In very preterm, any abnormal NSG (till term postmenstrual age) was reported in 13% of very preterm. The ability to predict NDI using abnormal NSG reports has a test accuracy of 73.8%.\n","PeriodicalId":32638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_98_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurosonogram (NSG) is a widely used, noninvasive bedside investigation in neonatal intensive care. Yet, actual data on the proportions of abnormal findings, specific conclusions, and its ability to predict outcomes are sparse. We aimed to study these aspects in very preterm infants who are a high-risk group. This retrospective descriptive study aimed at analyzing reports of postnatal age-specific NSG reports done in very preterm neonates, and their associations with risk factors. Follow-up information prospectively recorded by the child development services was analyzed for the association of NSG abnormalities with neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Clinical and radiological details of 323 very preterm neonates were analyzed. Abnormal NSG (defined as ≥Grade 3 intraventricular hemorrhage/≥Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia/ventriculomegaly) was reported in 42 infants (13%) at or less than term postmenstrual age; 8% of babies at ≤2 weeks postnatal age; and 12% at 36–40 weeks. Choroid plexus cyst was the most common “other” findings. Gestational age <28 weeks, chorioamnionitis, extensive resuscitation, ventilation >24 h, and culture-proven sepsis were independent risk factors for abnormal NSG in the first 2 weeks of life. Of the babies followed up, 19.25% babies had NDI. The sensitivity of any abnormal NSG was only 16% and the specificity was 91% to predict NDI. The negative predictive value of abnormal NSG for NDI was 79.5%. In very preterm, any abnormal NSG (till term postmenstrual age) was reported in 13% of very preterm. The ability to predict NDI using abnormal NSG reports has a test accuracy of 73.8%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产新生儿的神经电图:结果、风险因素以及与神经发育结果的关联:回顾性研究
神经电图(NSG)是新生儿重症监护中广泛使用的一种无创床边检查方法。然而,有关异常发现的比例、具体结论及其预测预后能力的实际数据却很少。我们的目的是对作为高风险群体的早产儿进行这些方面的研究。 这项回顾性描述性研究旨在分析针对极早产新生儿的产后年龄特异性 NSG 报告及其与风险因素的关联。研究还分析了儿童发展服务机构记录的随访信息,以了解 NSG 异常与神经发育障碍(NDI)之间的关联。 研究分析了 323 名早产儿的临床和放射学详情。据报告,42 例(13%)月龄或小于足月的婴儿出现 NSG 异常(定义为≥3 级脑室内出血/≥2 级脑室周围白质异常/脑室肿大);8% 的婴儿在出生后≤2 周时出现 NSG 异常;12% 的婴儿在出生后 36-40 周时出现 NSG 异常。脉络丛囊肿是最常见的 "其他 "检查结果。胎龄24小时和经培养证实的败血症是导致出生后两周内NSG异常的独立风险因素。在接受随访的婴儿中,19.25% 的婴儿患有 NDI。在预测 NDI 方面,任何异常 NSG 的灵敏度仅为 16%,特异度为 91%。NSG 异常对 NDI 的阴性预测值为 79.5%。 在极早产儿中,有 13% 的极早产儿报告了任何异常的 NSG(直到足月后年龄)。使用异常 NSG 报告预测 NDI 的测试准确率为 73.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infection and reactive donor response rate in a tertiary care hospital in South India: A retrospective observational study Corynebacterium jeikeium from exudative pharyngitis: A close mimicker of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Impact of evidence-based pedagogical approach on clinical reasoning among undergraduate physical therapy students Capnography troubleshooting: Lessons learned from laparoscopic hernia surgery A review on the crisis of antibiotic resistance and the strategies to combat resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1