“Like we would help brothers or sisters”? Practising Solidarity with Greek Civil War Refugees in Socialist Czechoslovakia and the GDR in the Shadow of World War II

Nikola Tohma, Julia Reinke
{"title":"“Like we would help brothers or sisters”? Practising Solidarity with Greek Civil War Refugees in Socialist Czechoslovakia and the GDR in the Shadow of World War II","authors":"Nikola Tohma, Julia Reinke","doi":"10.1017/s0020859024000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article investigates the solidarity campaigns supporting refugees from the Greek Civil War (1946–1949) in post-war Czechoslovakia and the emerging German Democratic Republic. Framed as an important bridge between the interwar and later Cold War forms of socialist internationalism, this case sheds light on its transitory character, revealing the narrative shift from anti-fascist to anti-imperialist contexts and the increasingly institutionalized and ritualized solidarity. Thus, not only was practising solidarity already an integral part of post-war socialist regimes, but it also served a variety of functions, contributing to the legitimization and identity of the Eastern bloc. Based on archival documents and press, the article uncovers the deployment of analogical institutional structures employed by both states, thus opening up the sphere of interaction with their citizens, mobilized to become involved in various ways. The two countries, however, departed from different positions, dealing with opposing legacies of the wartime experience, which influenced the motivations employed in their campaigns. Entangled in discourses of guilt, heroism, and victimhood, yet aligned under the proclaimed values of socialist brotherhood and anti-fascism, building internationalist solidarity in both countries worked alongside and even boosted attempts to overcome the obstacle of the Nazi past, both internally and in their mutual relationship. This article thus contributes to a better understanding of how internationalist solidarity functioned as a platform to build bridges – not only towards the “South”, but also within the Eastern bloc.","PeriodicalId":508119,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social History","volume":"19 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020859024000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the solidarity campaigns supporting refugees from the Greek Civil War (1946–1949) in post-war Czechoslovakia and the emerging German Democratic Republic. Framed as an important bridge between the interwar and later Cold War forms of socialist internationalism, this case sheds light on its transitory character, revealing the narrative shift from anti-fascist to anti-imperialist contexts and the increasingly institutionalized and ritualized solidarity. Thus, not only was practising solidarity already an integral part of post-war socialist regimes, but it also served a variety of functions, contributing to the legitimization and identity of the Eastern bloc. Based on archival documents and press, the article uncovers the deployment of analogical institutional structures employed by both states, thus opening up the sphere of interaction with their citizens, mobilized to become involved in various ways. The two countries, however, departed from different positions, dealing with opposing legacies of the wartime experience, which influenced the motivations employed in their campaigns. Entangled in discourses of guilt, heroism, and victimhood, yet aligned under the proclaimed values of socialist brotherhood and anti-fascism, building internationalist solidarity in both countries worked alongside and even boosted attempts to overcome the obstacle of the Nazi past, both internally and in their mutual relationship. This article thus contributes to a better understanding of how internationalist solidarity functioned as a platform to build bridges – not only towards the “South”, but also within the Eastern bloc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"就像我们帮助兄弟姐妹一样"?第二次世界大战阴影下社会主义捷克斯洛伐克和民主德国声援希腊内战难民的实践
本文研究了战后捷克斯洛伐克和新兴德意志民主共和国支持希腊内战(1946-1949 年)难民的声援运动。作为战时与冷战后期社会主义国际主义形式之间的重要桥梁,该案例揭示了社会主义国际主义的过渡性特征,揭示了从反法西斯到反帝国主义背景下的叙事转变,以及日益制度化和仪式化的团结。因此,团结不仅已成为战后社会主义政权不可分割的一部分,而且还发挥着多种功能,促进了东方集团的合法化和身份认同。文章以档案文件和新闻为基础,揭示了这两个国家所采用的类比体制结构的部署情况,从而打开了与本国公民的互动领域,动员他们以各种方式参与其中。然而,两国的立场不同,在处理战争遗留问题时截然相反,这影响了两国开展运动的动机。两国在内疚、英雄主义和受害者身份的论调中纠缠不清,但又在社会主义兄弟情谊和反法西斯主义的宣扬价值观下保持一致,在两国内部和相互关系中,建立国际主义团结与克服纳粹历史障碍的努力并行不悖,甚至起到了推波助澜的作用。因此,这篇文章有助于更好地理解国际主义团结如何作为一个平台,不仅在 "南方",而且在东方集团内部搭建桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eliza Ablovatski. Revolution and Political Violence in Central Europe. The Deluge of 1919. [Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare.] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [etc.] 2021. xii, 302 pp. Ill. £75.00. (Paper: £29.99; E-book: $44.99.) Introduction to Everyday Internationalism: Socialist–South Connections and Mass Culture during the Cold War Frontline Citizens: Liberation Movements, Transnational Solidarity, and the Making of Anti-Imperialist Citizenship in Tanzania “Without Solidarity, No People”: International Solidarity in the East German People's Solidarity “Like we would help brothers or sisters”? Practising Solidarity with Greek Civil War Refugees in Socialist Czechoslovakia and the GDR in the Shadow of World War II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1