Transformation of the perception of the Civil War in Karelia by participants and eyewitnesses of events (according to the memoirs and autobiographical materials of the 1930s–1960s)

Elena Ju. Dubrovskaya
{"title":"Transformation of the perception of the Civil War in Karelia by participants and eyewitnesses of events (according to the memoirs and autobiographical materials of the 1930s–1960s)","authors":"Elena Ju. Dubrovskaya","doi":"10.37614/2949-1185.2023.2.4.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author shows the special significance of the collected in the 1930s–1960s, both published and stored in the Scientific Archive of the Karelian Science Сentre (SA KarRC RAS), autobiographical materials and memoirs about the Civil War and allied intervention in Russian Karelia. The process of transforming the collective memory of participants and eyewitnesses of these dramatic events under the influence of the officially constructed Soviet discourse was covered. The relevance of studying historical experience and mechanisms of refraction and change in images of the past, the \"image of the enemy\" that took place over the years in the memory of witnesses of the era was noted. The origin of the used texts was established, their specifics were considered. At the same time, it was noted that the analyzed memories and materials cannot be considered a historical source of exclusively personal origin, since they inevitably bear the seal of the time when they were written or recorded by the collectors of \"Stories about the Civil War in Karelia.\" Identified using the case study method, the \"living evidence\" of the past allows you to turn to the \"human dimension\" of time, seeing it from a historical and anthropological perspective.","PeriodicalId":198792,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Kоla Science Centre. Series: Natural Sciences and Humanities","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Kоla Science Centre. Series: Natural Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37614/2949-1185.2023.2.4.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author shows the special significance of the collected in the 1930s–1960s, both published and stored in the Scientific Archive of the Karelian Science Сentre (SA KarRC RAS), autobiographical materials and memoirs about the Civil War and allied intervention in Russian Karelia. The process of transforming the collective memory of participants and eyewitnesses of these dramatic events under the influence of the officially constructed Soviet discourse was covered. The relevance of studying historical experience and mechanisms of refraction and change in images of the past, the "image of the enemy" that took place over the years in the memory of witnesses of the era was noted. The origin of the used texts was established, their specifics were considered. At the same time, it was noted that the analyzed memories and materials cannot be considered a historical source of exclusively personal origin, since they inevitably bear the seal of the time when they were written or recorded by the collectors of "Stories about the Civil War in Karelia." Identified using the case study method, the "living evidence" of the past allows you to turn to the "human dimension" of time, seeing it from a historical and anthropological perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事件参与者和目击者对卡累利阿内战看法的转变(根据 1930 年代至 1960 年代的回忆录和自传材料)
作者展示了 20 世纪 30 年代至 60 年代收集的有关内战和盟军干涉俄罗斯卡累利阿的自传材料和回忆录的特殊意义,这些材料既有已出版的,也有存放在卡累利阿科学中心科学档案馆(SA KarRC RAS)的。在官方构建的苏联话语的影响下,这些戏剧性事件的参与者和目击者的集体记忆发生了转变。研究历史经验和过去形象的折射和变化机制,以及多年来在时代见证者记忆中发生的 "敌人形象",具有重要意义。确定了所使用文本的来源,并考虑了其具体内容。同时还指出,所分析的记忆和材料不能被视为完全源自个人的历史资料,因为它们不可避免地带有 "卡累利阿内战故事 "收集者撰写或记录时的时代印记。使用案例研究法对过去的 "活证据 "进行鉴定,可以让您转向时间的 "人的维度",从历史学和人类学的角度来看待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographics of Russian expeditions of the 18th–20th centuries: exhibition from the collections of the Museum-Archive of the Barents Centre of the Humanities of the Federal Research Center “Kola Science Center” Dedications of the holy tables of the parish churches of the Kola deanery in the first half of the XIX century Grateful and productive tandem (in blessed memory of E. Ya. Patsia and B. I. Koshechkin) Ethnic village as a regional tourism brand Family history reflected in the archives of families with german roots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1