Nurazlina Abdul Raof, Norazlina Abdul Aziz, Nadia Omar, Wan Liza Md Amin @ Fahmy
{"title":"Unmasking company liability for corruption by associated persons","authors":"Nurazlina Abdul Raof, Norazlina Abdul Aziz, Nadia Omar, Wan Liza Md Amin @ Fahmy","doi":"10.1108/jfc-05-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (MACC Act) has introduced Section 17 A, which holds companies and their management accountable for bribery committed by their Associated Persons in the interest of the company. This study aims to explore the evolving concept of Associated Persons and corporate liability within this legal framework. It delves into three primary legal models of Associated Persons, particularly focusing on corrupt cases falling under Sections 17 A (1), 17 A (6) and 17 A (7) of the MACC Act. The study also investigates the extent of Associated Persons’ involvement in these cases that eventually led to company liability.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study deployed thematic and comparative analyses to assess the legal framework and highlight the significance of Section 17 A of the MACC Act.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study disclosed that, despite having corruption policies, there is still a possibility for Associated Persons to engage in corrupt activities. To ensure long-term business sustainability, it is crucial to implement effective mechanisms and a strong compliance culture.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study suggests implementing a due diligence checklist and conducting risk assessments for companies as measures against corruption caused by Associated Persons. Corporate entities and legal professionals may benefit from the reported findings to better comprehend the corruption offences outlined in Section 17 A of the MACC Act.\n","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"32 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-05-2023-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (MACC Act) has introduced Section 17 A, which holds companies and their management accountable for bribery committed by their Associated Persons in the interest of the company. This study aims to explore the evolving concept of Associated Persons and corporate liability within this legal framework. It delves into three primary legal models of Associated Persons, particularly focusing on corrupt cases falling under Sections 17 A (1), 17 A (6) and 17 A (7) of the MACC Act. The study also investigates the extent of Associated Persons’ involvement in these cases that eventually led to company liability.
Design/methodology/approach
The study deployed thematic and comparative analyses to assess the legal framework and highlight the significance of Section 17 A of the MACC Act.
Findings
The study disclosed that, despite having corruption policies, there is still a possibility for Associated Persons to engage in corrupt activities. To ensure long-term business sustainability, it is crucial to implement effective mechanisms and a strong compliance culture.
Originality/value
This study suggests implementing a due diligence checklist and conducting risk assessments for companies as measures against corruption caused by Associated Persons. Corporate entities and legal professionals may benefit from the reported findings to better comprehend the corruption offences outlined in Section 17 A of the MACC Act.
目的《2009 年马来西亚反腐败委员会法》(MACC Act)引入了第 17 A 条,规定公司及其管理层须对其相关人员为公司利益而实施的贿赂行为负责。本研究旨在探讨在此法律框架内相关人员和公司责任概念的演变。本研究深入探讨了相关人员的三种主要法律模式,尤其侧重于《澳门商业公司法》第 17 A (1)、17 A (6) 和 17 A (7) 条下的腐败案件。研究还调查了相关人员在这些案件中的参与程度,这些案件最终导致了公司的责任。研究采用了专题分析和比较分析的方法来评估法律框架,并强调了《澳门商会法》第 17 A 条的重要性。研究结果研究显示,尽管制定了腐败政策,但相关人员仍有可能参与腐败活动。为确保企业的长期可持续发展,实施有效的机制和强大的合规文化至关重要。原创性/价值本研究建议实施尽职调查清单并对公司进行风险评估,以此作为打击相关人员腐败行为的措施。公司实体和法律专业人士可从报告的研究结果中受益,从而更好地理解《澳门商业法典》第 17 A 条中概述的腐败罪行。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers