{"title":"Relationship between pesticide research output and GDP: a socio-economic analysis","authors":"Sivagami Murugappan, Jeyshankar Ramalingam","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-10-2023-0374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe focus of this study was to evaluate the relationship between research publications in the pesticide field, a country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita. The study aims to analyze pesticide use in association with a country’s population and research publications. The purpose of this study is to uncover the country’s contribution to pesticide research and assess the financial resources allocated to it as a percentage of their GDP by exploring these factors.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe Web of Science database was used to retrieve data for the period of 2001–2020. The use of scientometric indicators allowed for the analysis of the collaborative patterns and active performance of countries in pesticide research. Socio-economic analysis was used to determine the contribution of countries toward pesticide research.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study demonstrated a strong association (0.952%) between a country’s GDP and its research publications in the field of pesticide research. Countries, such as Denmark, Belgium and Australia, have benefited from global collaboration, which has enhanced their research efforts. Despite ranking lower in pesticide utilization, India focused on pesticide research, as indicated by its high publication/GDP per capita ratio (0.26).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch on pesticides directly impacts agricultural practices, which, in turn, influence the economic production of the agricultural sector. Changes in pesticide usage can have inference for crop yields, food price and, eventually, the GDP. Comparative analysis can assist in evaluating the efficiency of regulatory policies in balancing ecological concerns with economic interests. Changes in regulations may impact both pesticide usage and economic outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":507843,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-10-2023-0374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The focus of this study was to evaluate the relationship between research publications in the pesticide field, a country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita. The study aims to analyze pesticide use in association with a country’s population and research publications. The purpose of this study is to uncover the country’s contribution to pesticide research and assess the financial resources allocated to it as a percentage of their GDP by exploring these factors.
Design/methodology/approach
The Web of Science database was used to retrieve data for the period of 2001–2020. The use of scientometric indicators allowed for the analysis of the collaborative patterns and active performance of countries in pesticide research. Socio-economic analysis was used to determine the contribution of countries toward pesticide research.
Findings
This study demonstrated a strong association (0.952%) between a country’s GDP and its research publications in the field of pesticide research. Countries, such as Denmark, Belgium and Australia, have benefited from global collaboration, which has enhanced their research efforts. Despite ranking lower in pesticide utilization, India focused on pesticide research, as indicated by its high publication/GDP per capita ratio (0.26).
Originality/value
Research on pesticides directly impacts agricultural practices, which, in turn, influence the economic production of the agricultural sector. Changes in pesticide usage can have inference for crop yields, food price and, eventually, the GDP. Comparative analysis can assist in evaluating the efficiency of regulatory policies in balancing ecological concerns with economic interests. Changes in regulations may impact both pesticide usage and economic outcomes.
目的 本研究的重点是评估农药领域的研究出版物、一国的国内生产总值(GDP)和人均 GDP 之间的关系。本研究旨在分析农药使用与一个国家的人口和研究出版物之间的关系。本研究的目的是通过探讨这些因素,揭示国家对农药研究的贡献,并评估分配给农药研究的财政资源占其国内生产总值的百分比。利用科学计量指标分析了各国在农药研究方面的合作模式和积极表现。研究结果这项研究表明,一个国家的国内生产总值与该国在农药研究领域发表的研究论文之间存在密切联系(0.952%)。丹麦、比利时和澳大利亚等国从全球合作中获益匪浅,从而加强了其研究工作。尽管印度在杀虫剂使用方面排名靠后,但其出版物/人均国内生产总值的比率(0.26)很高,这表明印度专注于杀虫剂研究。农药使用量的变化会对作物产量、粮食价格以及最终的国内生产总值产生影响。比较分析有助于评估监管政策在平衡生态关切和经济利益方面的效率。法规的变化可能会影响农药的使用和经济成果。