Returning to work after lockdown: A multi-study investigation into the temporal effects of directive leadership

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1111/joop.12499
Zhonghua Gao, Yonghong Liu, Aichia Chuang, Jinlai Zhou, Chen Zhao, Jun Yang
{"title":"Returning to work after lockdown: A multi-study investigation into the temporal effects of directive leadership","authors":"Zhonghua Gao,&nbsp;Yonghong Liu,&nbsp;Aichia Chuang,&nbsp;Jinlai Zhou,&nbsp;Chen Zhao,&nbsp;Jun Yang","doi":"10.1111/joop.12499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaders' use of directive leadership has been found to increase when they face an unprecedented crisis. However, extant literature has failed to answer how directive leadership functions in this specific situation. Using the return-to-work after COVID-19 lockdown as an example, we drew upon regulatory focus theory and conducted three studies to investigate the temporal effects of directive leadership on followers' regulatory foci and work role performance. In Study 1, we conducted an experience sampling method (ESM) study tracking a sample of 250 employees over 1 week when the COVID-19 was originally reported in China. In Study 2, we conducted another ESM study on 125 employees over 2 weeks when the Omicron variant was surging in China. Both studies showed that the positive effect of daily directive leadership on followers' work promotion focus was strongest on the first day upon returning to work after lockdowns but decreased over time. In contrast, the positive effect of daily directive leadership on followers' work prevention focus increased throughout our sampling periods and became strongest on the last day. Moreover, our results indicate that daily directive leadership interacts with the elapsed time to influence two forms of work role performance – task proactivity and task proficiency – through the mediating roles of promotion focus and prevention focus, respectively. In Study 3, we conducted a vignette experiment employing a within- and between-subject design on a sample of 171 U.S. participants. The results further supported the moderating role of elapsed time after returning to work in the differential effects of directive leadership on followers' two regulatory foci.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12499","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaders' use of directive leadership has been found to increase when they face an unprecedented crisis. However, extant literature has failed to answer how directive leadership functions in this specific situation. Using the return-to-work after COVID-19 lockdown as an example, we drew upon regulatory focus theory and conducted three studies to investigate the temporal effects of directive leadership on followers' regulatory foci and work role performance. In Study 1, we conducted an experience sampling method (ESM) study tracking a sample of 250 employees over 1 week when the COVID-19 was originally reported in China. In Study 2, we conducted another ESM study on 125 employees over 2 weeks when the Omicron variant was surging in China. Both studies showed that the positive effect of daily directive leadership on followers' work promotion focus was strongest on the first day upon returning to work after lockdowns but decreased over time. In contrast, the positive effect of daily directive leadership on followers' work prevention focus increased throughout our sampling periods and became strongest on the last day. Moreover, our results indicate that daily directive leadership interacts with the elapsed time to influence two forms of work role performance – task proactivity and task proficiency – through the mediating roles of promotion focus and prevention focus, respectively. In Study 3, we conducted a vignette experiment employing a within- and between-subject design on a sample of 171 U.S. participants. The results further supported the moderating role of elapsed time after returning to work in the differential effects of directive leadership on followers' two regulatory foci.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封锁后重返工作岗位:关于指令性领导的时间效应的多项研究调查
研究发现,当领导者面临前所未有的危机时,他们会更多地使用指令型领导。然而,现有文献未能回答指令型领导在这种特定情况下是如何发挥作用的。我们以 COVID-19 封锁后的重返工作岗位为例,借鉴调控焦点理论,开展了三项研究,探讨指令型领导对追随者调控焦点和工作角色表现的时间影响。在研究一中,我们采用经验取样法(ESM)对 250 名员工进行了为期一周的跟踪研究,当时 COVID-19 最初在中国被报道。在研究 2 中,我们对 125 名员工进行了为期 2 周的另一项经验取样法研究,当时欧米茄变体正在中国悄然兴起。这两项研究都表明,日常指令性领导对追随者工作促进专注度的积极影响在停工后重返工作岗位的第一天最强,但随着时间的推移会逐渐减弱。与此相反,日常指令性领导对追随者工作预防关注度的积极影响在整个取样期间都在增加,并在最后一天变得最强。此外,我们的研究结果表明,日常指令性领导与时间间隔相互作用,分别通过促进关注和预防关注的中介作用,影响两种形式的工作角色表现--任务主动性和任务熟练性。在研究 3 中,我们对 171 名美国参与者进行了小故事实验,采用了被试内和被试间设计。研究结果进一步证实,在指令型领导对追随者的两个调节焦点产生不同影响的过程中,重返工作岗位后的时间起到了调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1