Exploring SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Acceptance in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe

Simon Ssentongo, Dennis Kinyoki, Ruth Gemi, Alex Muhereza, Fifi Manuel, Rebecca Waugh, Mary Linehan, Jared Saxton, Cougar P Hall, Josh West, Benjamin Crookston
{"title":"Exploring SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Acceptance in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe","authors":"Simon Ssentongo, Dennis Kinyoki, Ruth Gemi, Alex Muhereza, Fifi Manuel, Rebecca Waugh, Mary Linehan, Jared Saxton, Cougar P Hall, Josh West, Benjamin Crookston","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths worldwide, making the uptake of effective vaccines critical to saving lives. In Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe, both supply- and demand-side challenges have made high rates of vaccination difficult to achieve. The current study seeks to describe vaccination rates and reasons for vaccine hesitancy in both Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.  \nMethods. The current study uses data that came from a cross sectional survey that was conducted face to face in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. This study uses frequency statistics, chi-square test statistics, and multivariate regression analysis to describe and explore differences between the two countries. The Health Belief Model was used as a framework for sorting and understanding findings. \nResults and Conclusions. This study reveals that vaccine uptake was much lower in Sierra Leone than in Zimbabwe. Zimbabweans were almost twice as likely as Sierra Leoneans to be vaccinated while Sierra Leoneans were significantly more likely to believe the vaccine was risky. Individuals who were older, from Zimbabwe, and were healthcare workers or community leaders were more likely to be vaccinated. Those who were from Zimbabwe, had secondary or tertiary education, and were community leaders were more likely to be concerned about catching COVID-19 than community members. Faith leaders were less likely to be concerned about catching COVID-19 in public. These findings add to our understanding of attitudes that lead to vaccine hesitancy and uptake.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused millions of deaths worldwide, making the uptake of effective vaccines critical to saving lives. In Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe, both supply- and demand-side challenges have made high rates of vaccination difficult to achieve. The current study seeks to describe vaccination rates and reasons for vaccine hesitancy in both Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.  Methods. The current study uses data that came from a cross sectional survey that was conducted face to face in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. This study uses frequency statistics, chi-square test statistics, and multivariate regression analysis to describe and explore differences between the two countries. The Health Belief Model was used as a framework for sorting and understanding findings. Results and Conclusions. This study reveals that vaccine uptake was much lower in Sierra Leone than in Zimbabwe. Zimbabweans were almost twice as likely as Sierra Leoneans to be vaccinated while Sierra Leoneans were significantly more likely to believe the vaccine was risky. Individuals who were older, from Zimbabwe, and were healthcare workers or community leaders were more likely to be vaccinated. Those who were from Zimbabwe, had secondary or tertiary education, and were community leaders were more likely to be concerned about catching COVID-19 than community members. Faith leaders were less likely to be concerned about catching COVID-19 in public. These findings add to our understanding of attitudes that lead to vaccine hesitancy and uptake.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索塞拉利昂和津巴布韦对 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的接受程度
背景与目的。2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已在全球范围内造成数百万人死亡,因此有效疫苗的接种对于挽救生命至关重要。在塞拉利昂和津巴布韦,供应方和需求方的挑战使得疫苗接种率难以达到高水平。本研究旨在描述塞拉利昂和津巴布韦的疫苗接种率以及疫苗接种犹豫不决的原因。 方法。本研究使用的数据来自在塞拉利昂和津巴布韦进行的面对面横断面调查。本研究使用频率统计、卡方检验统计和多元回归分析来描述和探讨两国之间的差异。健康信念模型被用作分类和理解研究结果的框架。结果和结论。这项研究显示,塞拉利昂的疫苗接种率远远低于津巴布韦。津巴布韦人接种疫苗的可能性几乎是塞拉利昂人的两倍,而塞拉利昂人认为接种疫苗有风险的可能性明显更高。年龄较大、来自津巴布韦、是医疗工作者或社区领袖的人更有可能接种疫苗。与社区成员相比,来自津巴布韦、受过中等或高等教育以及社区领袖更有可能担心感染 COVID-19。信仰领袖不太可能担心在公共场合感染 COVID-19。这些发现加深了我们对导致疫苗接种犹豫不决的态度的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi Faith-based Healthcare in Africa: Stylized Facts from Data Collected by the Catholic Church Effective Localization: Case Study of a Faith-based Health Partnership in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe Faith Based Healthcare in Africa Health Status Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Risk Perceptions in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1