{"title":"Factors Associated with Clinical Practice Competency Among Nursing and Health Science Students in Ethiopia","authors":"K. Tegegne, Jemberu Chane Fetene, Tadele Kassahun Wudu, Yosef Aragaw Gonete, Abebe Tadesse Tibebu, Yideg Abinew Kebedes, Moges Tadesse Abebe","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical practice competence is affected by different factors in clinical setting like Skill of the educator, staff–student interaction, a clear assessment guideline; Effective mentoring and constructive feedback will also influence learning. Poor performance is caused by low competence and improving competency would improve performance. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis's is to asses’ factors affecting clinical practice competency of medical and health science students in Ethiopia. \nMethods: We conducted a related literature search (February up to March 2023 ) of PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies describing the factors associated with clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia. The quality of studies was independently assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa quality scale (NOS), which was guided by the PRISMA checklist. The Q test and I2 statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among selected studies. If the heterogeneity was obvious (I2 >50%), the random effects model (REM) was used. If the heterogeneity was low (I2≤50%), the fixed effects model (FEM) was used. \nResults: There were 1613 participants in four (4) investigations. The pooled effect size of clinical practice competency among students in the form of odds ratio (OR) with the presence of a checklist 3.40 (95% CI 2.50–4.62), p<0.00001, I2=0%), with the orientation of objective 3.84 (95% CI 2.29–6.43), p<0.00001, I2=57%) ,students having receptor in clinical practice 2.42, (95% CI 1.68–3.48), p=0.00001, I2=47%) ,having confidence during performing the procedure 2.16, (95% CI 1.17–3.99), p=0.01, I2=53%) \nThe final pooled effect size after trim and fill analysis in the random effect model was found to be 1.27 (95%CI: -0.19, -2.73) for the association between staff encourage to do practice and clinical practice competency. This indicated that absence of a significant association between staff encourage to do practice and clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia. \nConclusions: The presence of a checklist, the orientation of objective, having receptor in clinical practice and students having confidence during performing the procedure are factors associated with clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Clinical practice competence is affected by different factors in clinical setting like Skill of the educator, staff–student interaction, a clear assessment guideline; Effective mentoring and constructive feedback will also influence learning. Poor performance is caused by low competence and improving competency would improve performance. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis's is to asses’ factors affecting clinical practice competency of medical and health science students in Ethiopia.
Methods: We conducted a related literature search (February up to March 2023 ) of PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies describing the factors associated with clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia. The quality of studies was independently assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa quality scale (NOS), which was guided by the PRISMA checklist. The Q test and I2 statistics were used to evaluate the heterogeneity among selected studies. If the heterogeneity was obvious (I2 >50%), the random effects model (REM) was used. If the heterogeneity was low (I2≤50%), the fixed effects model (FEM) was used.
Results: There were 1613 participants in four (4) investigations. The pooled effect size of clinical practice competency among students in the form of odds ratio (OR) with the presence of a checklist 3.40 (95% CI 2.50–4.62), p<0.00001, I2=0%), with the orientation of objective 3.84 (95% CI 2.29–6.43), p<0.00001, I2=57%) ,students having receptor in clinical practice 2.42, (95% CI 1.68–3.48), p=0.00001, I2=47%) ,having confidence during performing the procedure 2.16, (95% CI 1.17–3.99), p=0.01, I2=53%)
The final pooled effect size after trim and fill analysis in the random effect model was found to be 1.27 (95%CI: -0.19, -2.73) for the association between staff encourage to do practice and clinical practice competency. This indicated that absence of a significant association between staff encourage to do practice and clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia.
Conclusions: The presence of a checklist, the orientation of objective, having receptor in clinical practice and students having confidence during performing the procedure are factors associated with clinical practice competency among medical and health science students in Ethiopia.
背景:临床实践能力受临床环境中不同因素的影响,如教育者的技能、师生互动、明确的评估准则;有效的指导和建设性的反馈也会影响学习。 临床表现不佳的原因是能力不足,而提高能力将改善临床表现。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估影响埃塞俄比亚医学和健康科学学生临床实践能力的因素。研究方法我们在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了相关文献检索(2 月至 2023 年 3 月),以查找描述与埃塞俄比亚医学和健康科学专业学生临床实践能力相关因素的研究。研究质量由纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量量表(NOS)独立评估,该量表以 PRISMA 核对表为指导。Q检验和I2统计量用于评估所选研究之间的异质性。如果异质性明显(I2>50%),则使用随机效应模型(REM)。如果异质性较低(I2≤50%),则采用固定效应模型(FEM)。研究结果四(4)项研究共有 1613 名参与者。学生临床实践能力的集合效应大小为:有检查表的几率比(OR)3.40(95% CI 2.50-4.62),P<0.00001,I2=0%),有目标导向的几率比(OR)3.84(95% CI 2.29-6.43),P<0.00001,I2=57%),学生在临床实践中有接受者的几率比(OR)2.42,(95% CI 1.68-3.48),P=0.00001。48),P=0.00001,I2=47%),在实施手术时有信心 2.16,(95% CI 1.17-3.99),P=0.01,I2=53%)。在随机效应模型中,经过修剪和填充分析后,发现员工鼓励实践与临床实践能力之间的最终汇集效应大小为 1.27(95%CI:-0.19,-2.73)。这表明在埃塞俄比亚的医学和健康科学专业学生中,教员鼓励实习与临床实践能力之间没有明显的关联。结论检查表的存在、目标的定位、临床实践中的受体以及学生在操作过程中的信心是与埃塞俄比亚医卫学生临床实践能力相关的因素。