Readability and credibility evaluation of most-visited health websites based on eBizMBA and Alexa global ranking

S. Rahmatizadeh, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, Hamed Nasibi-Sis, Hossein Motahari-Nezhad
{"title":"Readability and credibility evaluation of most-visited health websites based on eBizMBA and Alexa global ranking","authors":"S. Rahmatizadeh, Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi, Hamed Nasibi-Sis, Hossein Motahari-Nezhad","doi":"10.30699/fhi.v13i0.567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Online health information is one of the most important and widely used sources of information. Currently, a significant number of individuals use the internet for health-related information to learn about health, disease, health promotion, and threats to their health.Material and Methods: This research examined the top 15 health websites based on their popularity in eBizMBA and Alexa rank from January to February 2022. A total of 30 health websites (15 from each category) were evaluated in terms of credibility by the use of Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and health on the net foundation (HON) code. Also, the readability of the mentioned websites was evaluated by the use of four readability tools.Results: Most of the websites ranked by both Alexa and eBizMBA met the “Authority” and” Complementarity\" criteria. When it comes to the readability of the 30 most visited health websites according to eBizMBA and Alexa analytics in the world, the analysis demonstrated that the readability of highly-ranked health websites was higher than the recommended level.Conclusion: Some of the websites had deficiencies according to the HONcode and JAMA criteria, and the average readability of the websites did not meet the gold standard. Despite the increasing use of the internet for medical information, these resources' poor quality and readability remain a barrier to informed decision-making of patients.","PeriodicalId":477354,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health informatics","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v13i0.567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Online health information is one of the most important and widely used sources of information. Currently, a significant number of individuals use the internet for health-related information to learn about health, disease, health promotion, and threats to their health.Material and Methods: This research examined the top 15 health websites based on their popularity in eBizMBA and Alexa rank from January to February 2022. A total of 30 health websites (15 from each category) were evaluated in terms of credibility by the use of Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and health on the net foundation (HON) code. Also, the readability of the mentioned websites was evaluated by the use of four readability tools.Results: Most of the websites ranked by both Alexa and eBizMBA met the “Authority” and” Complementarity" criteria. When it comes to the readability of the 30 most visited health websites according to eBizMBA and Alexa analytics in the world, the analysis demonstrated that the readability of highly-ranked health websites was higher than the recommended level.Conclusion: Some of the websites had deficiencies according to the HONcode and JAMA criteria, and the average readability of the websites did not meet the gold standard. Despite the increasing use of the internet for medical information, these resources' poor quality and readability remain a barrier to informed decision-making of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 eBizMBA 和 Alexa 全球排名对访问量最大的健康网站进行可读性和可信度评估
简介在线健康信息是最重要、使用最广泛的信息来源之一。目前,很多人通过互联网获取与健康相关的信息,了解健康、疾病、健康促进以及对健康的威胁:本研究根据 2022 年 1 月至 2 月在 eBizMBA 和 Alexa 排名中的受欢迎程度,对排名前 15 位的健康网站进行了调查。通过使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)和健康网络基金会(HON)代码,共对 30 个健康网站(每个类别 15 个)的可信度进行了评估。此外,还使用四种可读性工具对上述网站的可读性进行了评估:结果:Alexa 和 eBizMBA 排名的大多数网站都符合 "权威性 "和 "互补性 "标准。互补性 "标准。根据 eBizMBA 和 Alexa 分析,全球访问量最大的 30 个健康网站的可读性分析表明,排名靠前的健康网站的可读性高于推荐水平:结论:根据 HONcode 和 JAMA 标准,部分网站存在不足之处,网站的平均可读性未达到黄金标准。尽管人们越来越多地使用互联网获取医疗信息,但这些资源的低质量和可读性仍然是患者做出知情决策的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview and Classification of Evaluation Metrics of Appointment Scheduling Systems Readability and credibility evaluation of most-visited health websites based on eBizMBA and Alexa global ranking The Prevalence of Smartphone Addiction and Its Relationship with the Level of e-Health Literacy in Medical Sciences Students Smart Solutions for Veterans: Enhancing Amputee Self-Care through Mobile Technology Survival Analysis of Patients with COVID-19 using Deep Neural Network and Random Forrest Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1