Early de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized cellular therapy adult patients with febrile neutropenia

M. Lucena, Kelly J. Gaffney, Theresa A. Urban, Catherine Forbes, Pavithra Srinivas, N. Majhail, E. Cober, S. Mossad, Lisa Rybicki, B. Hamilton
{"title":"Early de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized cellular therapy adult patients with febrile neutropenia","authors":"M. Lucena, Kelly J. Gaffney, Theresa A. Urban, Catherine Forbes, Pavithra Srinivas, N. Majhail, E. Cober, S. Mossad, Lisa Rybicki, B. Hamilton","doi":"10.46989/001c.94105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an oncologic emergency frequently encountered in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy patients, which requires immediate initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Data regarding antibiotic de-escalation (DE) in neutropenic patients are limited, and guideline recommendations vary. A clinical protocol for antibiotic DE of broad-spectrum agents was implemented if patients were afebrile after 72 hours and had no clinical evidence of infection. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of antibiotic therapy days between the pre-and post-DE protocol implementation group. Secondary endpoints included rates of subsequent bacteremia during index hospitalization, 30-day mortality, and hospital length of stay. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to assess outcomes for patients who received allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, or CAR T-cell therapy under the antibiotic de-escalation protocol (post-DE) compared to those who did not (pre-DE). The pre-DE group underwent HCT/CAR T-cell from February 2018 through September 2018 (n=64), and the post-DE group from February 2019 through September 2019 (n=67). The median duration of antibiotics was significantly lower in the post-DE group (6 days; range 3-60 days) compared to the pre-DE group (8 days; range 3-31 days) (p=0.034). There were no differences in any secondary endpoints. We conclude that antibiotic DE in neutropenic HCT or CAR T-cell therapy patients treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics for at least three days who are afebrile and without documented infection appears to be a safe and effective practice. Adopting it significantly reduces the number of days of antibiotics without compromising patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":503947,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hematology International","volume":"57 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hematology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.94105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an oncologic emergency frequently encountered in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy patients, which requires immediate initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Data regarding antibiotic de-escalation (DE) in neutropenic patients are limited, and guideline recommendations vary. A clinical protocol for antibiotic DE of broad-spectrum agents was implemented if patients were afebrile after 72 hours and had no clinical evidence of infection. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of antibiotic therapy days between the pre-and post-DE protocol implementation group. Secondary endpoints included rates of subsequent bacteremia during index hospitalization, 30-day mortality, and hospital length of stay. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to assess outcomes for patients who received allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, or CAR T-cell therapy under the antibiotic de-escalation protocol (post-DE) compared to those who did not (pre-DE). The pre-DE group underwent HCT/CAR T-cell from February 2018 through September 2018 (n=64), and the post-DE group from February 2019 through September 2019 (n=67). The median duration of antibiotics was significantly lower in the post-DE group (6 days; range 3-60 days) compared to the pre-DE group (8 days; range 3-31 days) (p=0.034). There were no differences in any secondary endpoints. We conclude that antibiotic DE in neutropenic HCT or CAR T-cell therapy patients treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics for at least three days who are afebrile and without documented infection appears to be a safe and effective practice. Adopting it significantly reduces the number of days of antibiotics without compromising patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发热性中性粒细胞减少症住院细胞疗法成人患者抗生素治疗的早期降级
发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是造血细胞移植(HCT)和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞治疗患者经常遇到的一种肿瘤急症,需要立即使用广谱抗生素。有关中性粒细胞减少患者抗生素降级(DE)的数据有限,指南建议也各不相同。如果患者在 72 小时后无发热且无临床感染证据,则采用广谱抗生素降级的临床方案。主要终点是抗生素治疗天数在实施前和实施后两组之间的差异。次要终点包括指数住院期间的后续菌血症发生率、30 天死亡率和住院时间。我们对病历进行了回顾性分析,以评估根据抗生素降级方案接受异基因造血干细胞移植、自体造血干细胞移植或CAR T细胞治疗的患者(DE后)与未接受治疗的患者(DE前)的治疗效果。DE前组从2018年2月至2018年9月接受了HCT/CAR T细胞治疗(n=64),DE后组从2019年2月至2019年9月接受了HCT/CAR T细胞治疗(n=67)。与DE前组(8天;范围3-31天)相比,DE后组的抗生素中位持续时间显著缩短(6天;范围3-60天)(P=0.034)。任何次要终点均无差异。我们得出的结论是,对于接受广谱抗生素治疗至少三天且无发热和感染记录的中性粒细胞移植或 CAR T 细胞治疗患者,抗生素 DE 似乎是一种安全有效的做法。在不影响患者预后的情况下,采用这种方法可大大减少抗生素的使用天数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transfusion Support in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Contemporary Narrative Review Sinus bradycardia as a rare adverse event in patients receiving cyclosporine A after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Walking ability in adults with severe hemophilia: A cross-sectional study Epidemiology, Treatment Trends, and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in the Middle East and Africa: A Systematic Review Early de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized cellular therapy adult patients with febrile neutropenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1