Effect of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy on the Pregnancy Outcomes of Women with Repeated Implantation Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tingting Ma, Yan Pu
{"title":"Effect of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy on the Pregnancy Outcomes of Women with Repeated Implantation Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Tingting Ma, Yan Pu","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5102048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : A major challenge in reproductive medicine is repeated implantation failure (RIF). Possible benefits of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for pregnancy outcomes are still uncertain, and more evidence is required to properly evaluate this. The current meta-analysis was therefore carried out to assess the impact of intrauterine PRP infusion on pregnancy outcomes in women with RIF. Methods : Various databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase) were screened for English-language papers that investigated the effect of PRP treatment on pregnancy outcomes in RIF women who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). This effect was analyzed in both frozen-thawed and fresh cycles. These studies involved randomized controlled trial (RCT) and quasi-experimental (non-randomized experimental) studies, but excluded case-control, case series, self-control, cross-sectional studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to determine study quality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcome variables, and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for continuous outcome variables. These were performed under fixed-or random-effect models. Results : This meta-analysis evaluated 15 articles from the literature. Improved pregnancy outcomes were observed in RIF women who received PRP, including higher rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth compared to control patients. Conclusions : The results of this study indicate that PRP could be a useful treatment strategy for RIF patients and those with a thin endometrium. Additional large RCTs are required to identify the subpopulation of women who could derive the maximum benefit from PRP.","PeriodicalId":505527,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5102048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : A major challenge in reproductive medicine is repeated implantation failure (RIF). Possible benefits of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for pregnancy outcomes are still uncertain, and more evidence is required to properly evaluate this. The current meta-analysis was therefore carried out to assess the impact of intrauterine PRP infusion on pregnancy outcomes in women with RIF. Methods : Various databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase) were screened for English-language papers that investigated the effect of PRP treatment on pregnancy outcomes in RIF women who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). This effect was analyzed in both frozen-thawed and fresh cycles. These studies involved randomized controlled trial (RCT) and quasi-experimental (non-randomized experimental) studies, but excluded case-control, case series, self-control, cross-sectional studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to determine study quality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous outcome variables, and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for continuous outcome variables. These were performed under fixed-or random-effect models. Results : This meta-analysis evaluated 15 articles from the literature. Improved pregnancy outcomes were observed in RIF women who received PRP, including higher rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth compared to control patients. Conclusions : The results of this study indicate that PRP could be a useful treatment strategy for RIF patients and those with a thin endometrium. Additional large RCTs are required to identify the subpopulation of women who could derive the maximum benefit from PRP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体富血小板血浆疗法对反复种植失败妇女妊娠结局的影响:系统回顾与元分析
背景:反复植入失败(RIF)是生殖医学面临的一大挑战。富血小板血浆(PRP)对妊娠结局可能带来的益处仍不确定,需要更多证据来正确评估。因此,本荟萃分析旨在评估宫腔内注射 PRP 对 RIF 女性妊娠结局的影响。方法:筛选了各种数据库(Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase)中研究PRP治疗对接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(IVF/ICSI)的RIF女性妊娠结局影响的英文论文。这种影响在冷冻解冻周期和新鲜周期中都进行了分析。这些研究包括随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验(非随机对照试验)研究,但不包括病例对照、病例系列、自我对照和横断面研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表确定研究质量。对二分结果变量计算风险比(RR),对连续结果变量计算加权平均差(WMD)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。这些都是在固定或随机效应模型下进行的。结果:该荟萃分析评估了 15 篇文献。与对照组患者相比,接受 PRP 的 RIF 妇女的妊娠结局有所改善,包括更高的植入率、临床妊娠率和活产率。结论 :本研究结果表明,PRP 对 RIF 患者和子宫内膜薄的患者来说是一种有用的治疗策略。需要进行更多的大型 RCT 研究,以确定能从 PRP 中获得最大益处的妇女亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer in the World: A Narrative Review of the Recent Literature Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Menstruation in Vaccinated Women: A Monocentric Retrospective Study Comparative Study of the Effects of Sublingual Trinitroglycerin and Sublingual Misoprostol on Cervical Preparation before Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Effect of Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation Combined with Abdominal Acupoint Massage on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Function Recovery after Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1