Engagement of new entrants in mountain farming through the lens of generativity: Lack of family farming background and its implications in Alpine Austria and Italy

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Sociologia Ruralis Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1111/soru.12476
Bernhard Grüner, Savina Konzett
{"title":"Engagement of new entrants in mountain farming through the lens of generativity: Lack of family farming background and its implications in Alpine Austria and Italy","authors":"Bernhard Grüner, Savina Konzett","doi":"10.1111/soru.12476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While mountain family farmers rely on cultural, financial and material resources passed on from previous generations, new entrants typically lack such intergenerational amenities. Applying the concept of ‘generativity’ to agriculture prove valuable in examining start‐up motives, obstacles, opportunities and impacts regarding generational renewal via newcomers without a family farming background. Following a multilevel approach, we interviewed new entrants, long‐established family farmers and members of agricultural organisations in three Alpine regions of Austria and Italy. We illustrate that family farmers primarily care for their farm's continued existence, while new entrants seek autonomy from the agricultural industry, thus transmitting the relevance of agriculture beyond their offspring. At first sight, land access is a major hurdle for new entrants, as agricultural land is reserved for family farmers. By taking over abandoned farms, new entrants escape constraints imposed by previous farming generations, thus facilitating the introduction of novel operating concepts and the regeneration of traditional practices. Consequently, newcomer farms are transforming from previously exclusive production sites into open spaces of exchange that include non‐agricultural communities, reconnecting land, production and consumption. We conclude that a lack of family farming ties may foster extra‐familial renewal and sustainability in mountain agriculture.","PeriodicalId":47985,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia Ruralis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia Ruralis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While mountain family farmers rely on cultural, financial and material resources passed on from previous generations, new entrants typically lack such intergenerational amenities. Applying the concept of ‘generativity’ to agriculture prove valuable in examining start‐up motives, obstacles, opportunities and impacts regarding generational renewal via newcomers without a family farming background. Following a multilevel approach, we interviewed new entrants, long‐established family farmers and members of agricultural organisations in three Alpine regions of Austria and Italy. We illustrate that family farmers primarily care for their farm's continued existence, while new entrants seek autonomy from the agricultural industry, thus transmitting the relevance of agriculture beyond their offspring. At first sight, land access is a major hurdle for new entrants, as agricultural land is reserved for family farmers. By taking over abandoned farms, new entrants escape constraints imposed by previous farming generations, thus facilitating the introduction of novel operating concepts and the regeneration of traditional practices. Consequently, newcomer farms are transforming from previously exclusive production sites into open spaces of exchange that include non‐agricultural communities, reconnecting land, production and consumption. We conclude that a lack of family farming ties may foster extra‐familial renewal and sustainability in mountain agriculture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 "世代相传 "的角度看山区农业新参与者的参与:奥地利和意大利阿尔卑斯山区缺乏家庭农业背景及其影响
山区家庭农场主依赖于上一代传承下来的文化、财政和物质资源,而新加入者通常缺乏这种代际便利。将 "世代相传 "的概念应用于农业,对研究没有家庭农业背景的新来者的创业动机、障碍、机遇和世代更新的影响很有价值。我们采用多层次方法,在奥地利和意大利的三个阿尔卑斯地区采访了新加入者、历史悠久的家庭农场主和农业组织成员。我们发现,家庭农场主主要关心其农场的持续生存,而新加入者则寻求从农业产业中获得自主权,从而将农业的相关性传递给后代。乍一看,土地使用权是新进入者的一大障碍,因为农业用地是留给家庭农场主的。通过接管废弃的农场,新加入者摆脱了前几代农民的束缚,从而促进了新经营理念的引入和传统做法的再生。因此,新加入的农场正在从以前的排他性生产场所转变为包括非农业社区在内的开放式交流空间,将土地、生产和消费重新联系在一起。我们的结论是,缺乏家庭农业联系可能会促进山区农业的家庭外更新和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia Ruralis
Sociologia Ruralis Multiple-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Sociologia Ruralis reflects the diversity of European social-science research on rural areas and related issues. The complexity and diversity of rural problems require multi and interdisciplinary approaches. Over the past 40 years Sociologia Ruralis has been an international forum for social scientists engaged in a wide variety of disciplines focusing on social, political and cultural aspects of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis covers a wide range of subjects, ranging from farming, natural resources and food systems to rural communities, rural identities and the restructuring of rurality.
期刊最新文献
The cofradías’ role within the Fisheries Local Action Groups system: Implications for small‐scale fisheries in Galicia (Spain) Incentivising public goods delivery in the UK through the lens of Theories of Practice and Theory of Capital ‘We are here our hearts are there’: Rurality, belonging and walking together Relational work in an alternative food network: The fundamental role of shared meaning for organising markets differently Input legitimacy of bottom‐up fishery governance: Lessons from community‐led local development in two Nordic EU countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1