On the validity of descriptors in ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines

Qijie Li, Hao Feng, Yiping Cui
{"title":"On the validity of descriptors in ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines","authors":"Qijie Li, Hao Feng, Yiping Cui","doi":"10.1075/csl.00032.qij","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines (hereinafter called Guidelines) are a\n multi-lingual framework mainly based on the language proficiency development of several European languages. Little consideration\n is given to the peculiarity of Chinese. Efforts are made to assess the validity of the descriptors in Guidelines\n in comparison with Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education\n (hereinafter called Standards). A total of five parameters from Guidelines that are not\n compatible with Standards have been selected and two questionnaires compiled by the authors are answered by local\n American Chinese language teachers to evaluate the validity of these descriptors. The study shows that the descriptors in\n Standards are more valid in differentiating language proficiency levels of Chinese. In accordance with this\n study, some revisions and amendments should be made to Guidelines.","PeriodicalId":517052,"journal":{"name":"Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA","volume":"227 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報). The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.00032.qij","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines (hereinafter called Guidelines) are a multi-lingual framework mainly based on the language proficiency development of several European languages. Little consideration is given to the peculiarity of Chinese. Efforts are made to assess the validity of the descriptors in Guidelines in comparison with Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education (hereinafter called Standards). A total of five parameters from Guidelines that are not compatible with Standards have been selected and two questionnaires compiled by the authors are answered by local American Chinese language teachers to evaluate the validity of these descriptors. The study shows that the descriptors in Standards are more valid in differentiating language proficiency levels of Chinese. In accordance with this study, some revisions and amendments should be made to Guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论 ACTFL 语言能力指南中描述词的有效性
ACTFL 语言能力指南》(以下简称《指南》)是一个多语言框架,主要基于欧洲几种语言的语言能力发展。对汉语的特殊性考虑甚少。我们将《指南》中的描述性指标与《汉语国际教育能力分级标准》(以下简称《标准》)进行对比,以评估其有效性。研究选取了《指南》中与《标准》不一致的五个参数,由作者编制了两份问卷,由美国当地汉语教师回答,以评估这些描述词的有效性。研究结果表明,《标准》中的描述语在区分汉语水平等级方面更为有效。根据这项研究,应对《指南》进行一些修订和修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is animation always better for learning Chinese characters? On the validity of descriptors in ACTFL Language Proficiency Guidelines Effective character teaching methods for L1 English Chinese-as-a-foreign-language learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1