Choosing home: discharge to assess and the Health and Care Act 2022

Jean McHale
{"title":"Choosing home: discharge to assess and the Health and Care Act 2022","authors":"Jean McHale","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic National Health Service hospitals were instructed to rapidly discharge patients from wards with consequences which, in the case of some care homes, has been claimed to be catastrophic due to lack of effective testing and isolation. These tragic events also highlight a longer-term issue, namely hospital discharge policies and their relationship with obligations placed on local authorities to assess needs of individuals under the Care Act 2014. Concerns have been expressed for some time regarding the delays in getting patients discharged from hospitals – with them being labelled inappropriately as ‘bed blockers’. The Health and Care Act 2022 includes new statutory measures concerning discharge to facilitate rapid discharge of patients from hospitals. This can be seen as a solution to a major resource problem, but could this ultimately undermine choice and respect for individual wellbeing?The article explores the background to the recent controversies concerning hospital discharge decisions and their relationship with the Care Act 2014. It demonstrates that, while the current debates and controversies regarding hospital discharge decisions are nothing new and pre-date the pandemic by decades, hospital discharge processes accelerated during the pandemic and have left a problematic legacy. It interrogates the Health and Care Act 2022 discharge provisions and whether these will be an effective integration of health and social care provision going forward or whether there is a real risk of undermining individual autonomy, the Care Act 2014 obligations concerning promotion of well-being and a person’s choice of their ‘home’.","PeriodicalId":509896,"journal":{"name":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","volume":"121 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v74i4.1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic National Health Service hospitals were instructed to rapidly discharge patients from wards with consequences which, in the case of some care homes, has been claimed to be catastrophic due to lack of effective testing and isolation. These tragic events also highlight a longer-term issue, namely hospital discharge policies and their relationship with obligations placed on local authorities to assess needs of individuals under the Care Act 2014. Concerns have been expressed for some time regarding the delays in getting patients discharged from hospitals – with them being labelled inappropriately as ‘bed blockers’. The Health and Care Act 2022 includes new statutory measures concerning discharge to facilitate rapid discharge of patients from hospitals. This can be seen as a solution to a major resource problem, but could this ultimately undermine choice and respect for individual wellbeing?The article explores the background to the recent controversies concerning hospital discharge decisions and their relationship with the Care Act 2014. It demonstrates that, while the current debates and controversies regarding hospital discharge decisions are nothing new and pre-date the pandemic by decades, hospital discharge processes accelerated during the pandemic and have left a problematic legacy. It interrogates the Health and Care Act 2022 discharge provisions and whether these will be an effective integration of health and social care provision going forward or whether there is a real risk of undermining individual autonomy, the Care Act 2014 obligations concerning promotion of well-being and a person’s choice of their ‘home’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择家庭:出院评估与《2022 年健康与护理法
在冠状病毒大流行的早期阶段,国民健康服务医院接到指示,让病人迅速从病房出院,由于缺乏有效的检测和隔离,一些护理院据称造成了灾难性后果。这些悲剧事件也凸显了一个长期问题,即出院政策及其与地方当局根据《2014 年护理法案》评估个人需求的义务之间的关系。一段时间以来,人们一直对患者出院延迟表示担忧,他们被不恰当地称为 "床位阻碍者"。2022 年健康与护理法》包含了有关出院的新法定措施,以促进患者快速出院。本文探讨了近期有关出院决定的争议背景及其与《2014 年护理法案》的关系。文章表明,尽管目前有关出院决定的辩论和争议并不新鲜,而且早于大流行病数十年,但出院程序在大流行病期间加快,并留下了问题。报告对《2022 年健康与护理法案》中的出院规定进行了探讨,探讨了这些规定是否能有效整合未来的医疗和社会护理服务,或者是否存在损害个人自主权、《2014 年护理法案》中有关促进福祉的义务以及个人对 "家 "的选择的实际风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Northern Ireland Executive: politics, law and a rethink of judicial intervention Fettering scrutiny on executive discretionary powers? Developments in the judicial reviewability of ministerial non-statutory guidance Inheriting the royals: royal chartered bodies in Ireland after 1922 The Union in court, Part 3: In Re Allister and Peeples’ Applications for Judicial Review [2023] UKSC 5 A continuing nuisance: Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd [2023] UKSC 16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1