A revisit of three hypotheses about second language development of English relative clauses

Chi Wui Ng
{"title":"A revisit of three hypotheses about second language development of English relative clauses","authors":"Chi Wui Ng","doi":"10.1075/pl.23008.ng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cantonese-English learners in Hong Kong confront with substantial difficulty in development of English relative\n clauses. This study aims at verifying predictions of hypotheses about second language learners’ development of English relative\n clauses with data of written Hong Kong English. wh relatives and that relatives in the Hong Kong\n component of the International Corpus of English were identified. Frequencies of occurrence of distinct types of relative clauses\n in the Hong Kong component were compared to evaluate whether predictions of Keenan and\n Comrie’s (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy, Kuno’s (1974)\n Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis, and Hamilton’s (1994) Subject-Object Hierarchy\n Hypothesis are supported by the corpus data respectively. Results indicate that the Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis is supported\n by data of written Hong Kong English whilst the other two hypotheses are partially supported only. Hypotheses supported by corpus\n data of written Hong Kong English are suggested to inform English language education in Hong Kong by illuminating the\n instructional order of different types of English relative clauses.","PeriodicalId":497578,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogical linguistics","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogical linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.23008.ng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cantonese-English learners in Hong Kong confront with substantial difficulty in development of English relative clauses. This study aims at verifying predictions of hypotheses about second language learners’ development of English relative clauses with data of written Hong Kong English. wh relatives and that relatives in the Hong Kong component of the International Corpus of English were identified. Frequencies of occurrence of distinct types of relative clauses in the Hong Kong component were compared to evaluate whether predictions of Keenan and Comrie’s (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy, Kuno’s (1974) Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis, and Hamilton’s (1994) Subject-Object Hierarchy Hypothesis are supported by the corpus data respectively. Results indicate that the Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis is supported by data of written Hong Kong English whilst the other two hypotheses are partially supported only. Hypotheses supported by corpus data of written Hong Kong English are suggested to inform English language education in Hong Kong by illuminating the instructional order of different types of English relative clauses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视关于英语相对从句第二语言发展的三个假设
香港的粤语英语学习者在英语相对从句的发展方面面临很大困难。本研究旨在通过香港英语书面语的数据来验证关于第二语言学习者英语亲属关系从句发展的假设预测。通过比较香港语料库中不同类型相对从句的出现频率,评估 Keenan 和 Comrie(1977 年)的名词短语可及性层次理论、Kuno(1974 年)的感知困难假说和 Hamilton(1994 年)的主客体层次假说是否分别得到语料库数据的支持。结果表明,感知难度假说得到了书面香港英语数据的支持,而其他两个假说只得到了部分支持。香港书面英语的语料库数据支持的假设,通过阐明不同类型英语相对从句的教学顺序,为香港的英语教育提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A revisit of three hypotheses about second language development of English relative clauses The types of cues that help you learn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1