Cocoa Farmers' Participation in Public and Private Agricultural Extension Delivery in Amenfi Central District, Ghana

E. K. Tham-Agyekum, F. Ankuyi, Goddea Asiedu, Abourden, J. Bakang, Akua Yeboah, Oduro-Owusu
{"title":"Cocoa Farmers' Participation in Public and Private Agricultural Extension Delivery in Amenfi Central District, Ghana","authors":"E. K. Tham-Agyekum, F. Ankuyi, Goddea Asiedu, Abourden, J. Bakang, Akua Yeboah, Oduro-Owusu","doi":"10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural extension and knowledge management have become key blocks in driving sustainable food systems and rural development, especially in periods of dealing with the complexities surrounding climate change and sustainable food systems in localised systems. This study assessed cocoa farmers' participation in public and private agricultural extension services in Ghana. Using descriptive and inferential statistics and collecting data from 385 farmers, the study reveals that private extension services stand out in various indices: access to information (3.72), communication (3.96), and support and follow-up (3.45), while public extension services excel in social and environmental impact (3.54), and knowledge transfer (3.86). Intricate extension programme dynamics also reveal a clear preference for private extension in citizen power (23.6% vs. 7.3%), delegated power (33.2% vs. 8.6%), and partnership (39.2% vs. 13.5%). Using the binary probit regression model, this study examines how various socio-economic factors influence farmers' participation in extension programmes. Results indicate that key determinants for participation in public extension include gender, level of education, land size, availability of labour, and access to credit. Conversely, factors influencing participation in private extension programmes include membership in farmer groups, land ownership, land size, the availability of labour, and access to credit. Policymakers and extension workers can make extension services more useful and open to everyone by focusing on these socioeconomic factors and creating programmes that meet the unique needs and limitations of various farmer groups. This will ultimately lead to higher agricultural productivity, better livelihoods, and better rural development.","PeriodicalId":356487,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)","volume":"362 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural extension and knowledge management have become key blocks in driving sustainable food systems and rural development, especially in periods of dealing with the complexities surrounding climate change and sustainable food systems in localised systems. This study assessed cocoa farmers' participation in public and private agricultural extension services in Ghana. Using descriptive and inferential statistics and collecting data from 385 farmers, the study reveals that private extension services stand out in various indices: access to information (3.72), communication (3.96), and support and follow-up (3.45), while public extension services excel in social and environmental impact (3.54), and knowledge transfer (3.86). Intricate extension programme dynamics also reveal a clear preference for private extension in citizen power (23.6% vs. 7.3%), delegated power (33.2% vs. 8.6%), and partnership (39.2% vs. 13.5%). Using the binary probit regression model, this study examines how various socio-economic factors influence farmers' participation in extension programmes. Results indicate that key determinants for participation in public extension include gender, level of education, land size, availability of labour, and access to credit. Conversely, factors influencing participation in private extension programmes include membership in farmer groups, land ownership, land size, the availability of labour, and access to credit. Policymakers and extension workers can make extension services more useful and open to everyone by focusing on these socioeconomic factors and creating programmes that meet the unique needs and limitations of various farmer groups. This will ultimately lead to higher agricultural productivity, better livelihoods, and better rural development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳阿门菲中央区可可种植农户参与公共和私营农业推广活动的情况
农业推广和知识管理已成为推动可持续粮食系统和农村发展的关键因素,尤其是在应对气候变化和地方可持续粮食系统的复杂性时期。本研究对加纳可可种植农参与公共和私营农业推广服务的情况进行了评估。研究使用了描述性和推论性统计方法,并收集了 385 名农民的数据,结果显示,私营推广服务在以下各项指数中表现突出:获取信息(3.72)、沟通(3.96)以及支持和跟踪(3.45),而公共推广服务则在社会和环境影响(3.54)以及知识转让(3.86)方面表现出色。错综复杂的推广计划动态还显示,在公民权力(23.6% 对 7.3%)、委托权力(33.2% 对 8.6%)和伙伴关系(39.2% 对 13.5%)方面,私营推广服务明显占优。本研究使用二元概率回归模型,探讨了各种社会经济因素如何影响农民对推广计划的参与。结果表明,参与公共推广项目的主要决定因素包括性别、教育水平、土地面积、劳动力的可用性以及获得信贷的机会。相反,影响参与私人推广计划的因素包括农民团体成员资格、土地所有权、土地面积、劳动力的可用性以及获得信贷的机会。政策制定者和推广人员可以通过关注这些社会经济因素,制定满足不同农民群体独特需求和局限性的计划,使推广服务更加有用,并向所有人开放。这最终将提高农业生产率,改善生计,促进农村发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of State Defense Education in Facing the Threat of Terrorism Deterrence Strategy Through Deploying KRI in the North Natuna Sea to Support the National Defense System Structure Market Of Crude Palm Oil Industry In Indonesia Projection Of Climate Suitability For Mangosteen Based On Climate Change Scenarios In West Sumatra To Support National Resilience The Efforts of Lombok Regency Government to Recovery After the 2018 Lombok Earthquake Disaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1