POSSIBLE SCENARIOS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN TERMS OF THE EDUCATION QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Andrey E. Bakhmutsky, Galina P. Savinykh
{"title":"POSSIBLE SCENARIOS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMMES IN TERMS OF THE EDUCATION QUALITY ASSESSMENT","authors":"Andrey E. Bakhmutsky, Galina P. Savinykh","doi":"10.25807/22224378_2024_1-2_118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specialists capable of complex multidimensional assessment are in demand in the education system. The authors of the paper explore the potential of Master’s degree programmes in terms of the education quality assessment. The research methods are: deduction and comparative logical analysis. The paper presents the empirical data on the current state of the designated profile of Master’s programmes in the context of their content specifics and goal-setting. The sample consisted of 12 Master’s degree programmes from 10 universities of the Russian Federation. The costs of the target components of Master’s degree programmes in the field of quality assessment are identified; the ways of updating the target components are indicated taking into account professional standards. The intersections in the disciplines of “pedagogical” and “non-pedagogical” Master’s programmes in terms of quality assessment are identified and interpreted. Arguments are put forward for adjusting the content of programmes taking into account the labour functions established by professional standards in the field of education. Three scenarios for the development of Master’s degree programmes in terms of quality assessment are proposed in the interests of general education: the scenario of the applied Master’s degree, the scenario of the academic Master’s degree, and the scenario of convergence.","PeriodicalId":516113,"journal":{"name":"Научное мнение","volume":"607 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Научное мнение","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2024_1-2_118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specialists capable of complex multidimensional assessment are in demand in the education system. The authors of the paper explore the potential of Master’s degree programmes in terms of the education quality assessment. The research methods are: deduction and comparative logical analysis. The paper presents the empirical data on the current state of the designated profile of Master’s programmes in the context of their content specifics and goal-setting. The sample consisted of 12 Master’s degree programmes from 10 universities of the Russian Federation. The costs of the target components of Master’s degree programmes in the field of quality assessment are identified; the ways of updating the target components are indicated taking into account professional standards. The intersections in the disciplines of “pedagogical” and “non-pedagogical” Master’s programmes in terms of quality assessment are identified and interpreted. Arguments are put forward for adjusting the content of programmes taking into account the labour functions established by professional standards in the field of education. Three scenarios for the development of Master’s degree programmes in terms of quality assessment are proposed in the interests of general education: the scenario of the applied Master’s degree, the scenario of the academic Master’s degree, and the scenario of convergence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从教育质量评估的角度看硕士学位课程发展的可能方案
教育系统需要能够进行复杂的多维评估的专家。本文作者探讨了硕士学位课程在教育质量评估方面的潜力。研究方法是:演绎法和比较逻辑分析法。论文根据硕士课程的内容特点和目标设定,提供了有关硕士课程指定概况现状的实证数据。样本包括俄罗斯联邦 10 所大学的 12 个硕士学位课程。确定了硕士学位课程目标内容在质量评估方面的成本;根据专业标准指出了更新目标内容的方法。确定并解释了 "师范 "和 "非师范 "硕士学位课程在质量评估方面的交叉点。根据教育领域专业标准规定的劳动职能,提出了调整课程内容的论据。从普通教育的利益出发,提出了在质量评估方面发展硕士学位课程的三种方案:应 用硕士学位方案、学术硕士学位方案和趋同方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GOD, CREATION AND NOTHING: THE TYPOLOGY AND PROBLEMS OF THE MAIN CONCEPTS OF THE ORIGIN OF THE WORLD IN THE HISTORY OF EUROPEAN PHILOSOPHY THE MUTUAL INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY AND COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT PEDAGOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE AESTHETIC FOUNDATIONS OF MUSICAL WORKS OF THE BAROQUE ERA THE PEDAGOGICAL ROLE OF THE CYCLE OF CHILDREN’S PIANO PIECES “RAINBOW” BY G. G. OKUNEV IN TRAINING PIANISTS OF CHINA ТРАДИЦИИ И НОВАЦИИ В ЦЕННОСТНОЙ СИСТЕМЕ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1