PREVALENCE, PATTERNS, AND DIFFERENT EXTRACTION MODALITIES OF FOREIGN BODY INGESTION IN PATIENTS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN KASHMIR

Younus Majeed Dar, Seerat Bashir, Ihsan Ali, Rauf Ahmad
{"title":"PREVALENCE, PATTERNS, AND DIFFERENT EXTRACTION MODALITIES OF FOREIGN BODY INGESTION IN PATIENTS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN KASHMIR","authors":"Younus Majeed Dar, Seerat Bashir, Ihsan Ali, Rauf Ahmad","doi":"10.36106/paripex/0205017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is commonly encountered in medical emergencies. Unlike adults, FB\ningestion is more prevalent in children.The type of FB ingestion and associated complications vary significantly.Unlike\nadults where FB ingestion can be accidental, FB ingestion in children is because of their tendencies to explore and put\neverything in their mouth with weak reflexes. In the current crossectional study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence,\nrisk factors, impaction site, clinical presentations, treatment modalities used to extract FBs in patients presenting FB\ningested emergency. Methods: We conducted a crossectional prospective study in the department of ENT, Head and\nNeck Surgery,Government Medical College,and Associated Hospitals (Sri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital),Srinagar J&K.\nThe patients admitted for FB ingestion emergency were enrolled for the current study. All the relevant demographic,\nclinical,and therapeutic modalities of each patient were recorded during the study.Results:The medical history of 284\nsubjects who presented with FB ingestion in emergency admitted between July 2019 to July 2021 was evaluated. More\nnumber of the subjects were in the age group of ≤ 5years. Unlike coin impaction in the paediatric subjects (84%), the\nbone chip ingestion was the most frequent impacted FB (57.7%) followed by the coin (31%) in the adult patients. The\nimpacted meat bolus and the button battery ingestion were reported in 67% and 1.4% of the subjects respectively.The\nlone mortality reported in our cohort was by the ingestion of a button battery. Conclusion: The prevalent type of\ningested FB in the pediatric subjects was the coin, and bone chip ingestion was more frequent FB in the adult subjects.\nThe therapeutic intervention for FB removal primarily depends upon the type of FB ingested, and site of impaction.\nBattery ingestion at an early age can be fatal for the subject.","PeriodicalId":19910,"journal":{"name":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","volume":"583 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/0205017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is commonly encountered in medical emergencies. Unlike adults, FB ingestion is more prevalent in children.The type of FB ingestion and associated complications vary significantly.Unlike adults where FB ingestion can be accidental, FB ingestion in children is because of their tendencies to explore and put everything in their mouth with weak reflexes. In the current crossectional study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, impaction site, clinical presentations, treatment modalities used to extract FBs in patients presenting FB ingested emergency. Methods: We conducted a crossectional prospective study in the department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery,Government Medical College,and Associated Hospitals (Sri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital),Srinagar J&K. The patients admitted for FB ingestion emergency were enrolled for the current study. All the relevant demographic, clinical,and therapeutic modalities of each patient were recorded during the study.Results:The medical history of 284 subjects who presented with FB ingestion in emergency admitted between July 2019 to July 2021 was evaluated. More number of the subjects were in the age group of ≤ 5years. Unlike coin impaction in the paediatric subjects (84%), the bone chip ingestion was the most frequent impacted FB (57.7%) followed by the coin (31%) in the adult patients. The impacted meat bolus and the button battery ingestion were reported in 67% and 1.4% of the subjects respectively.The lone mortality reported in our cohort was by the ingestion of a button battery. Conclusion: The prevalent type of ingested FB in the pediatric subjects was the coin, and bone chip ingestion was more frequent FB in the adult subjects. The therapeutic intervention for FB removal primarily depends upon the type of FB ingested, and site of impaction. Battery ingestion at an early age can be fatal for the subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克什米尔一家三级医院就诊病人异物误食的发生率、模式和不同的取出方式
背景:异物(FB)摄入是医疗急诊中经常遇到的情况。与成人不同,异物(FB)摄入在儿童中更为常见。异物(FB)摄入的类型和相关并发症有很大差异。与成人不同,异物(FB)摄入可能是意外造成的,而儿童异物(FB)摄入则是由于他们喜欢探索并将所有东西放入口中,且反射较弱。在本次交叉研究中,我们旨在评估FB嵌塞急诊患者的发病率、风险因素、嵌塞部位、临床表现、取出FB的治疗方式。研究方法我们在查谟和克什米尔斯利那加政府医学院及附属医院(斯里马哈拉贾-哈里-辛格医院)耳鼻咽喉头颈外科进行了一项交叉前瞻性研究。研究期间记录了每位患者的所有相关人口学、临床和治疗方式。结果:对 2019 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间急诊收治的 284 例摄入 FB 的受试者的病史进行了评估。年龄在5岁以下的受试者较多。与儿科受试者(84%)的硬币嵌塞不同,在成人患者中,骨片嵌塞是最常见的嵌塞食物(57.7%),其次是硬币(31%)。据报告,分别有 67% 和 1.4% 的受试者因误食肉丸和纽扣电池而死亡。结论在儿童受试者中,硬币是最常见的食物中毒类型,而在成人受试者中,骨屑是更常见的食物中毒类型。食物中毒清除的治疗干预主要取决于食物中毒的类型和植入部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ADVANCEMENTS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-EXPLORING THE APPLICATIONS OF PIEZOSURGERY A CASE REPORT ON STAGE IV HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA SEX DETERMINATION FROM FORAMEN MAGNUM MEASUREMENTS – AN AUTOPSY BASED STUDY IN NORTH KERALA POPULATION A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE GLOBAL IMPACT OF INDO-CHINA RELATIONS IN THE 21ST CENTURY ROLE OF ELEVATION OF C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) AS AN INDEPENDENT MARKER FOR SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1