Enjeux éthiques liés à la prise en charge médicamenteuse de la dysfonction érectile chez les patients détenus

T. de Bonneval , A. Lagarrigue
{"title":"Enjeux éthiques liés à la prise en charge médicamenteuse de la dysfonction érectile chez les patients détenus","authors":"T. de Bonneval ,&nbsp;A. Lagarrigue","doi":"10.1016/j.etiqe.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In France, one man out of five suffers from erectile dysfunction. Yet it is still a taboo subject, because erectile dysfunction undermines the symbol of virility in our phallocentric society. In the collective imagination, erectile dysfunction is commonly associated with impotence and weakness.This pathology seems even more taboo in prison environment. Perhaps because it's a closed environment governed by the law of the strongest.The fact remains, however, that this dysfunction can lead to profound somatic and/or psychological uneasiness, so that therapeutic treatment appears legitimate or necessary. However this legitimacy is limited by the patient's status as a prisoner.This work has neither the vocation nor the pretention to provide specialized content on any particular discipline. On the contrary, it promotes a multidisciplinary approach based on philosophy, medicine, history and law. The main aim of this article is therefore to lay the foundations for an ethical reflection on the therapeutic management of convicts suffering from erectile dysfunction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72955,"journal":{"name":"Ethique & sante","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 164-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethique & sante","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1765462923001009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In France, one man out of five suffers from erectile dysfunction. Yet it is still a taboo subject, because erectile dysfunction undermines the symbol of virility in our phallocentric society. In the collective imagination, erectile dysfunction is commonly associated with impotence and weakness.This pathology seems even more taboo in prison environment. Perhaps because it's a closed environment governed by the law of the strongest.The fact remains, however, that this dysfunction can lead to profound somatic and/or psychological uneasiness, so that therapeutic treatment appears legitimate or necessary. However this legitimacy is limited by the patient's status as a prisoner.This work has neither the vocation nor the pretention to provide specialized content on any particular discipline. On the contrary, it promotes a multidisciplinary approach based on philosophy, medicine, history and law. The main aim of this article is therefore to lay the foundations for an ethical reflection on the therapeutic management of convicts suffering from erectile dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与药物治疗监狱病人勃起功能障碍有关的伦理问题
在法国,每五个男人中就有一个患有勃起功能障碍。然而,这仍然是一个禁忌话题,因为勃起功能障碍破坏了我们这个以阴茎为中心的社会中阳刚的象征。在集体想象中,勃起功能障碍通常与阳痿和软弱无力联系在一起。然而,事实是,这种功能障碍可能会导致深刻的躯体和/或心理不适,因此治疗似乎是合法或必要的。然而,病人的囚犯身份限制了这种合理性。这部作品既没有提供任何特定学科专业内容的使命,也不自命不凡。相反,它提倡一种基于哲学、医学、历史和法律的多学科方法。因此,本文的主要目的是为对患有勃起功能障碍的罪犯的治疗管理进行伦理反思奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethique & sante
Ethique & sante Health, Public Health and Health Policy, Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial board Avant-propos « Innovation et chirurgie cardiaque : ECMO, cœurs artificiels, greffes » Sommaire Cœurs artificiels : maintenir en vie à tout prix ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1