Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Sara Hamed, Ayman Shedid, Ghada Abdel-Halim, Ahmed Zainel-Din
{"title":"Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss","authors":"Sara Hamed, Ayman Shedid, Ghada Abdel-Halim, Ahmed Zainel-Din","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2023.245173.1269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a distressing condition affecting women of childbearing age, often with unexplained causes. Pulsatility Index (PI) in uterine arteries has been proposed as a potential diagnostic marker. Objectives: To assess disparities in uterine artery PI between women experiencing recurrent unexplained first-trimester miscarriages and those with no prior history of miscarriage. Study Design: A case-control study. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 non-pregnant women was the focus of this research. They were categorized into two distinct groups: the RPL group, denoted as Group A, and the control group, identified as Group B. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical evaluations, including an exhaustive medical history, general health, abdominal and pelvic examinations, in addition to two-dimensional ultrasound assessments and Doppler studies aimed at quantifying the PI of the uterine arteries. Results: A statistically significant variance was observed in PI of the right uterine artery between the RPL group and the control group. The mean PI values were 2.000 (±0.451) and 2.248 (±0.322), respectively. A notable distinction in the PI of the left uterine artery between the RPL group and the control group was also detected ( P-value < 0.05 ). Furthermore, PI values of both the right and left uterine arteries exhibited a statistically significant difference between the RPL and control groups ( P-value < 0.05 ). Conclusion : The mean uterine artery PI value was greater in RPL group in contrast to control group. This suggests an elevated resistance to blood flow within uterine arteries among women who have experienced RPL.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"153 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2023.245173.1269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a distressing condition affecting women of childbearing age, often with unexplained causes. Pulsatility Index (PI) in uterine arteries has been proposed as a potential diagnostic marker. Objectives: To assess disparities in uterine artery PI between women experiencing recurrent unexplained first-trimester miscarriages and those with no prior history of miscarriage. Study Design: A case-control study. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 non-pregnant women was the focus of this research. They were categorized into two distinct groups: the RPL group, denoted as Group A, and the control group, identified as Group B. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical evaluations, including an exhaustive medical history, general health, abdominal and pelvic examinations, in addition to two-dimensional ultrasound assessments and Doppler studies aimed at quantifying the PI of the uterine arteries. Results: A statistically significant variance was observed in PI of the right uterine artery between the RPL group and the control group. The mean PI values were 2.000 (±0.451) and 2.248 (±0.322), respectively. A notable distinction in the PI of the left uterine artery between the RPL group and the control group was also detected ( P-value < 0.05 ). Furthermore, PI values of both the right and left uterine arteries exhibited a statistically significant difference between the RPL and control groups ( P-value < 0.05 ). Conclusion : The mean uterine artery PI value was greater in RPL group in contrast to control group. This suggests an elevated resistance to blood flow within uterine arteries among women who have experienced RPL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性妊娠失败患者子宫动脉脉动指数(PI)变化研究
背景:复发性妊娠失败(RPL)是一种影响育龄妇女的令人痛苦的情况,通常原因不明。子宫动脉脉动指数(PI)被认为是一种潜在的诊断指标。研究目的评估复发性不明原因头胎流产妇女与无流产史妇女之间子宫动脉脉动指数的差异。研究设计:病例对照研究。材料与方法:本研究以 100 名非怀孕妇女为研究对象。所有参与者都接受了全面的临床评估,包括详尽的病史、一般健康状况、腹部和盆腔检查,以及旨在量化子宫动脉 PI 的二维超声评估和多普勒研究。结果在统计学上,RPL 组和对照组的右侧子宫动脉 PI 存在明显差异。平均 PI 值分别为 2.000(±0.451)和 2.248(±0.322)。RPL 组与对照组之间子宫左动脉的 PI 值也有显著差异(P 值 < 0.05)。此外,右侧和左侧子宫动脉的 PI 值在 RPL 组和对照组之间也有显著差异(P 值 < 0.05)。结论:与对照组相比,RPL 组的平均子宫动脉 PI 值更高。这表明经历过 RPL 的妇女的子宫动脉血流阻力增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nuchal translucency in pregnant women beyond 35 years and its relation to congenital cardiac abnormalities: A cross-section study Histopathological evaluation of products of conception in sporadic and recurrent abortions The Effect of Adding Vaginal Progesterone to Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Birth Weight of Constitutionally Small for Gestational Age Fetuses: A Randomized Clinical Trial Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1