Reformoptionen – die keine sind

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Wirtschaftsdienst Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.2478/wd-2024-0031
F. Ruland
{"title":"Reformoptionen – die keine sind","authors":"F. Ruland","doi":"10.2478/wd-2024-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the German pension debate, reform options are repeatedly proposed that are doomed to failure right from the start as they cannot be legally implemented to begin with. One of these is the inclusion of civil servants in the German state pension scheme. This option, however, is prohibited by the German Constitution. Another example is the inclusion of self-employed persons. This demand cannot be met as many freelancers are unable to pay their full contributions. Inflation adjustment of pensions would mean too much of a burden for women as well as for the sick and the disabled. Redistributing money from pensioners with high benefits to pensioners with a low pension would not be conducive, either. Not only would this mean an infringement of the principle of equality, but also there are too few high pensions to redistribute.","PeriodicalId":35890,"journal":{"name":"Wirtschaftsdienst","volume":"35 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wirtschaftsdienst","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2024-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the German pension debate, reform options are repeatedly proposed that are doomed to failure right from the start as they cannot be legally implemented to begin with. One of these is the inclusion of civil servants in the German state pension scheme. This option, however, is prohibited by the German Constitution. Another example is the inclusion of self-employed persons. This demand cannot be met as many freelancers are unable to pay their full contributions. Inflation adjustment of pensions would mean too much of a burden for women as well as for the sick and the disabled. Redistributing money from pensioners with high benefits to pensioners with a low pension would not be conducive, either. Not only would this mean an infringement of the principle of equality, but also there are too few high pensions to redistribute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革方案--哪些不是改革方案
在德国的养老金辩论中,一再提出的改革方案从一开始就注定要失败,因为这些方案从一开始就无法合法实施。其中之一就是将公务员纳入德国国家养老金计划。然而,德国宪法禁止这一方案。另一个例子是将自营职业者纳入其中。这一要求无法满足,因为许多自由职业者无法全额缴费。养老金的通货膨胀调整将给妇女、病人和残疾人带来沉重负担。将高福利领取者的养老金重新分配给低养老金领取者也是不利的。这不仅意味着违反平等原则,而且可重新分配的高额养老金太少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wirtschaftsdienst
Wirtschaftsdienst Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift, herausgegeben von der ZBW, publiziert Beiträge von namhaften Autor:innen aus Wissenschaft und Politik zu aktuellen Themen der Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik in Deutschland und in der Europäischen Union. Der Wirtschaftsdienst schlägt eine Brücke zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis, die Leser:innen werden sachkundig und allgemeinverständlich über aktuelle wirtschaftspolitische Themen informiert. Die Zeitschrift erscheint seit 1916 und gehört damit zu den traditionsreichsten wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften. Offiziell zitiert als: Wirtschaftsdienst
期刊最新文献
Die Schuldenbremse – ein Garant für nachhaltige Haushaltspolitik? Eine Replik auf Feld et al. (2024) Frankreich-Wahl: Substanzielle Folgen für die EU Zur aktuellen Krisenstimmung im Wohnungsbau Geburtenraten: Vom Baby-Boom zum Baby-Bust Abscheidung und Speicherung von CO2 und „schwer oder nicht vermeidbare Emissionen“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1