Effectiveness of Double Cervical Cerclage in Women with at Least One Previous Pregnancy Loss in the Second Trimester

Ahmed K.Abbas, Wael Naeem, omar k.Naser, labiba Elsayed, Heba Khattab, Ali A.Bendary
{"title":"Effectiveness of Double Cervical Cerclage in Women with at Least One Previous Pregnancy Loss in the Second Trimester","authors":"Ahmed K.Abbas, Wael Naeem, omar k.Naser, labiba Elsayed, Heba Khattab, Ali A.Bendary","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259001.1284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recurrent pregnancy failure in second trimester is defined as three or more losses although most authors consider clinical treatment with 2 consecutive miscarriages at 14-18 weeks of gestation. Preterm births are more likely to occur in future pregnancies for women who have previously experienced cervical incompetence. Objective: The study's objective was to determine whether double cervical cerclage had any impact on perinatal outcomes and preterm delivery prevention in women who had experienced second-trimester foetal loss. Materials and Methods: This interventional prospective randomized controlled study included patients who attended the Outpatient Clinic with suspected cervical incompetence either by previous obstetric history or by ultrasound examination with gestational age between 14 and 18 weeks. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups; group 1 included 20 patients who had traditional modified MacDonald operation using a 5 mm mersilene tape in the middle third of the cervix and group 2 included 20 matched patients who had double cervical cerclage with two purse-string sutures using two 5 mm mersilene tapes; in the upper and lower third of the cervix. Results: There was no significant difference between the double cervical and single cervical group regarding weight of the baby at birth, GA at delivery, abortion, mode of delivery and admission of baby to NICU. There was no significnat difference between both groups regarding hematuria, hospital stay (hours) and neonatal death after operation ( p > 0.05 ). Conclusion : Women with cervical incompetence who undergo double cervical cerclage do not experience better perinatal or maternal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"310 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259001.1284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent pregnancy failure in second trimester is defined as three or more losses although most authors consider clinical treatment with 2 consecutive miscarriages at 14-18 weeks of gestation. Preterm births are more likely to occur in future pregnancies for women who have previously experienced cervical incompetence. Objective: The study's objective was to determine whether double cervical cerclage had any impact on perinatal outcomes and preterm delivery prevention in women who had experienced second-trimester foetal loss. Materials and Methods: This interventional prospective randomized controlled study included patients who attended the Outpatient Clinic with suspected cervical incompetence either by previous obstetric history or by ultrasound examination with gestational age between 14 and 18 weeks. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups; group 1 included 20 patients who had traditional modified MacDonald operation using a 5 mm mersilene tape in the middle third of the cervix and group 2 included 20 matched patients who had double cervical cerclage with two purse-string sutures using two 5 mm mersilene tapes; in the upper and lower third of the cervix. Results: There was no significant difference between the double cervical and single cervical group regarding weight of the baby at birth, GA at delivery, abortion, mode of delivery and admission of baby to NICU. There was no significnat difference between both groups regarding hematuria, hospital stay (hours) and neonatal death after operation ( p > 0.05 ). Conclusion : Women with cervical incompetence who undergo double cervical cerclage do not experience better perinatal or maternal outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双宫颈环扎术对至少有一次妊娠失败经历的妇女在第二孕期的有效性
背景:尽管大多数学者认为在妊娠 14-18 周连续流产 2 次即可进行临床治疗,但妊娠后三个月的复发性妊娠失败是指流产 3 次或 3 次以上。曾有过宫颈机能不全经历的妇女在今后的妊娠中更有可能出现早产。研究目的本研究的目的是确定双宫颈环扎术是否会对经历过二胎流产的妇女的围产期结局和早产预防产生影响。材料与方法:这项干预性前瞻性随机对照研究的对象包括门诊中根据既往产科病史或超声波检查怀疑宫颈机能不全、孕龄在 14 到 18 周之间的患者。这些患者被随机分为两组:第一组包括 20 名患者,他们在宫颈的中三分之一处使用 5 毫米的美丝带进行传统的改良麦克唐纳手术;第二组包括 20 名匹配的患者,他们在宫颈的上三分之一处和下三分之一处使用两条 5 毫米的美丝带进行双层宫颈环扎术。结果双宫颈组和单宫颈组在婴儿出生时的体重、分娩时的体重、流产、分娩方式和新生儿重症监护室入院率方面没有明显差异。两组在术后血尿、住院时间(小时)和新生儿死亡方面没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论:宫颈机能不全的妇女接受双宫颈环扎术后,围产期或孕产妇的预后都不会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nuchal translucency in pregnant women beyond 35 years and its relation to congenital cardiac abnormalities: A cross-section study Histopathological evaluation of products of conception in sporadic and recurrent abortions The Effect of Adding Vaginal Progesterone to Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Birth Weight of Constitutionally Small for Gestational Age Fetuses: A Randomized Clinical Trial Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1