Association Between Maternal Lipid Profile and Fetal Birth Weight in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Pregnancies

Abd ELsamie Abd ELsamie, Sahar ElBaradie, Ayman Abd El Wahab, Howaida Abd Elrasoul, Mohamed Bakry
{"title":"Association Between Maternal Lipid Profile and Fetal Birth Weight in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Pregnancies","authors":"Abd ELsamie Abd ELsamie, Sahar ElBaradie, Ayman Abd El Wahab, Howaida Abd Elrasoul, Mohamed Bakry","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2024.81715.1143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes raises the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Fetal macrosomia is one of the most common perinatal problems in diabetes pregnancy, particularly in women with poor glycemic control. Aim: Determine the association between maternal serum lipid levels, particularly TG and TC levels, and newborn BW. Also, the ability of TG and TC levels was tested to predict macrosomia. Materials and Methods: This observational cohort study was conducted on 150 pregnant women divided into two groups 75 pregnant women with type2 DM and 75 pregnant women with GDM at 3 rd trimester GA of 29-40 week. The following lipid parameters were measured. Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the type 2DM group compared to GDM group regarding age, height, weight, BMI, F.B.G, 2HPP.BG, HbA1c, parity LDL, neonatal weight and gestational age ( p > 0.05 ). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between the type 2DM and GDM groups regarding TC, TG, and HDL. By applying Spearman’s correlation test, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between neonatal weight and age, TC, TG, and parity in the type 2DM group. Regression analysis defined Neonatal weight development among the type 2DM group as the persistently significant positive predictor for TG. Conclusion: This research demonstrated the utility of measuring fasting serum TG and TC levels measured at third-trimester pregnancy correlated positively with neonatal BW and may be considered an independent predictor of fetal macrosomia at term in type 2DM and GDM.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"822 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2024.81715.1143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes raises the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Fetal macrosomia is one of the most common perinatal problems in diabetes pregnancy, particularly in women with poor glycemic control. Aim: Determine the association between maternal serum lipid levels, particularly TG and TC levels, and newborn BW. Also, the ability of TG and TC levels was tested to predict macrosomia. Materials and Methods: This observational cohort study was conducted on 150 pregnant women divided into two groups 75 pregnant women with type2 DM and 75 pregnant women with GDM at 3 rd trimester GA of 29-40 week. The following lipid parameters were measured. Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the type 2DM group compared to GDM group regarding age, height, weight, BMI, F.B.G, 2HPP.BG, HbA1c, parity LDL, neonatal weight and gestational age ( p > 0.05 ). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference between the type 2DM and GDM groups regarding TC, TG, and HDL. By applying Spearman’s correlation test, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between neonatal weight and age, TC, TG, and parity in the type 2DM group. Regression analysis defined Neonatal weight development among the type 2DM group as the persistently significant positive predictor for TG. Conclusion: This research demonstrated the utility of measuring fasting serum TG and TC levels measured at third-trimester pregnancy correlated positively with neonatal BW and may be considered an independent predictor of fetal macrosomia at term in type 2DM and GDM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 型糖尿病和妊娠糖尿病孕妇的血脂谱与胎儿出生体重的关系
.摘要 背景:糖尿病会增加孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。胎儿巨大儿是糖尿病妊娠最常见的围产期问题之一,尤其是在血糖控制不佳的妇女中。目的:确定母体血清脂质水平(尤其是 TG 和 TC 水平)与新生儿体重之间的关系。同时,测试 TG 和 TC 水平预测巨大儿的能力。材料和方法:这项观察性队列研究的对象是 150 名孕妇,分为两组:75 名 2 型糖尿病孕妇和 75 名 GDM 孕妇,她们的孕期均为 3 个月,即孕 29-40 周。测量了以下血脂参数。结果显示2型DM组与GDM组在年龄、身高、体重、BMI、F.B.G、2HPP.BG、HbA1c、奇偶校验低密度脂蛋白、新生儿体重和胎龄方面的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。另一方面,2DM 组和 GDM 组在 TC、TG 和 HDL 方面的差异有统计学意义。通过斯皮尔曼相关性检验,2DM 组新生儿体重与年龄、TC、TG 和奇偶数之间存在统计学意义上的显著正相关。回归分析表明,2 型糖尿病组的新生儿体重发育是 TG 的持续显著正向预测因素。结论这项研究证明了测量空腹血清 TG 和 TC 水平的实用性,在怀孕 3 个月时测量的血清 TG 和 TC 水平与新生儿体重呈正相关,可被视为 2DM 型和 GDM 胎儿足月巨大儿的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nuchal translucency in pregnant women beyond 35 years and its relation to congenital cardiac abnormalities: A cross-section study Histopathological evaluation of products of conception in sporadic and recurrent abortions The Effect of Adding Vaginal Progesterone to Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Birth Weight of Constitutionally Small for Gestational Age Fetuses: A Randomized Clinical Trial Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1